Definition
"Evi" does not appear in modern legal usage as a standalone term. In Burrill's Law Dictionary, the entry context surrounding "evi" points to a fragment of a Latin or Saxon legal phrase rather than an independent legal term with settled meaning. Based on the source material, the fragment appears in connection with the privileges of parties to suits, witnesses, and related persons — specifically in the context of safe conduct or immunity from arrest while traveling to and from court proceedings.
The fuller context suggests this is a remnant of the Saxon legal tradition, preserved in phrases such as "eundo ad gemotum, et rediens de gemoto" — meaning "going to the meeting [court] and returning from the meeting." In that tradition, persons attending a gemot (an early Anglo-Saxon assembly or court) were entitled to protection during their travel. "Evi" may represent either an archival fragment, a scanning or transcription artifact, or a foreshortened reference within the dictionary's broader treatment of privilege from arrest.
---
Common Confusion
Do not confuse this fragment with "evi-" as a prefix in common English words (evidence, evident, eviction), nor with any standalone Latin legal term of the same spelling. The appearance of "evi" in historical legal dictionaries almost certainly reflects either a truncated headword or a printing artifact rather than an independent term of art. Researchers encountering "evi" in historical legal texts should examine surrounding context carefully before treating it as a discrete legal concept.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working with digitized historical legal dictionaries — particularly those produced from OCR scans of 19th-century texts — will frequently encounter partial words, truncated entries, or artifacts of page breaks and column formatting. Burrill's Law Dictionary, like other multi-volume reference works of its era, sometimes carries headwords or sub-entries across pages in ways that digitization does not cleanly preserve. "Evi" is a strong candidate for such an artifact.
If you are tracing the historical privilege of witnesses and litigants from arrest during court attendance, the relevant research path runs through the phrase "eundo et redeundo" (going and returning) and the broader doctrine of privilege from arrest. Burrill's entry, properly read, connects this to the Saxon gemot — an early English popular assembly that served judicial functions — and to the Laws of Edward the Confessor (LL. Edw. Conf.), a key source for Anglo-Saxon legal custom as transmitted into early English common law.
The citation to Spelman's glossary ("Spelman, voc. Gemotum") refers to Sir Henry Spelman's Glossarium Archaeologicum, a foundational source for Anglo-Saxon legal terminology. Researchers working on the deep history of court privilege, legislative immunity, or witness protection will find this lineage useful, but should treat "evi" as a gateway to that literature rather than a term with independent doctrinal content.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary is the sole source available for this entry, and the relevant passage is fragmentary. The text reads: "the parties to suits, witnesses, &c. See Privilege from arrest. A similar phrase was used in the Saxon law. Eundo ad gemotum, et rediens de gemoto. Spelman, voc. Gemotum. LL. Edw. Conf. c. 25, cited ibid."
This passage is best understood as a cross-reference within a larger entry — almost certainly the tail end of an entry on privilege from arrest or a related concept — rather than a self-contained definition of "evi." The Latin phrase "eundo ad gemotum, et rediens de gemoto" is the substantive content: it establishes that persons traveling to and from a Saxon assembly court (gemot) enjoyed legal protection, a principle that survived into common law as the privilege of witnesses and parties from civil arrest during court attendance.
No other historical dictionaries in the current corpus treat "evi" as an independent term. The absence of corroborating entries across sources like Black's, Bouvier's, or Tomlin's reinforces the interpretation that this is a fragment rather than a recognized legal term.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The underlying doctrine — privilege of witnesses and parties from arrest during attendance at judicial proceedings — was recognized in both English common law and early American courts, though its scope varied. Modern statutory and court rule frameworks have largely displaced the common-law privilege in most U.S. jurisdictions.
---