Definition
Latin: "and another." Et alius is a Latin phrase used in legal documents, pleadings, case captions, and instruments to indicate that additional parties exist beyond the one or more named. The abbreviation et al. (plural: et als. or et alii/et aliae) appears after the first-named party where listing all parties individually would be impractical or redundant.
In practice, et al. functions as a shorthand placeholder in case captions (e.g., Smith et al. v. Jones), deeds, grants, notices, and correspondence when multiple plaintiffs, defendants, grantors, grantees, or addressees are involved. The full names of all parties remain legally operative in the underlying pleading or instrument; et al. is a citation and caption convenience, not a substantive legal designation.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Et al." is used in general English, particularly in academic and bibliographic contexts, to abbreviate a list of authors or contributors after the first name.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not separately defined; treated as a learned Latin abbreviation with the same general abbreviated-list function.
Editorial note: The common and academic uses of et al. are largely consistent with the legal use, but the legal context adds procedural significance. In a case caption or deed, et al. is not merely a typographic convenience — it signals that all named parties in the underlying document hold legal rights or obligations, and omission of any party's name from the full instrument (not just the caption) can affect standing, service of process, and enforceability.
---
Common Confusion
Et alius (masculine singular) is the grammatically precise Latin form when one additional male person is referenced. The plural et alii (masculine) or et aliae (feminine) applies to multiple additional persons. Et alia covers additional things or mixed groups in some classical usage. Legal practice collapses all these forms into the single abbreviation et al. without distinction, and the historical dictionaries treat et al. as the operative unit regardless of number or gender. Researchers should not read grammatical significance into the abbreviated form as it appears in American legal documents.
Et al. is also sometimes confused with et ux. (et uxor, "and wife") and et vir ("and husband"), which are party-specific abbreviations rather than general placeholders. See RELATED TERMS.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The primary research significance of et alius is procedural and documentary rather than substantive. Several traps arise in corpus work:
First, caption versus record divergence. A case styled "Johnson et al. v. City of X" tells you multiple plaintiffs exist but does not identify them in the caption. Early court records, especially pre-20th century state court files, may index only the lead plaintiff's name. Researchers relying on caption searches alone may miss co-plaintiffs who are central to the dispute.
Second, deed and instrument research. In property records, a grantor line reading "William Hartwell et al." signals co-grantors whose interests affect title. Abstractors and title researchers must locate the full instrument, not rely on index entries, to identify all parties. Historical deed indices frequently indexed only the first-named grantor, making et al. entries a flag for incomplete information.
Third, service of process issues in historical records. Courts historically differed on whether service on the lead plaintiff or notice addressed to "X et al." satisfied notice requirements for all parties. Researchers analyzing procedural histories in older case files should not assume et al. in a notice document confirms proper service on all named parties.
Fourth, the abbreviation et als. (with the added English plural "s") appears in some American legal documents and reporters. This hybrid form is noted in both Black's editions and reflects common American practice; it carries no different legal meaning but can appear inconsistent across sources from the same period.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's Law Dictionary provide identical, compact definitions: "and another," with the note that et al. is affixed to the first-named party where several plaintiffs, grantors, or persons addressed exist, and that et als. appears as the plural variant in some usage. The two editions are in complete agreement and neither adds doctrinal elaboration — the term is treated as a purely functional Latin abbreviation requiring only translation and usage description.
Neither Black's edition addresses the grammatical variants (et alii, et aliae, et alia) or the procedural implications of et al. in case captions versus underlying pleadings. For those dimensions, researchers must turn to procedural treatises and rules governing caption requirements rather than the historical dictionaries.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Caption and abbreviation conventions are governed by court rules, which vary by jurisdiction and have changed over time. Some federal and state rules now require that all party names appear in the caption of the initial pleading even if et al. is used in subsequent filings. Researchers working with historical pleadings should not assume modern caption rules apply to older documents.
---