Definition
An archaic term for the true meaning, signification, or legal construction of a word or sentence. ENTENDMENT denotes the understanding of a text as the law reads it — that is, the authorized or proper interpretation that courts or legal authorities assign to language in a document, statute, or instrument. The term is now entirely obsolete in active legal usage and survives only in historical legal texts. Its functional successor is INTENDMENT, which carried the same meaning forward into modern legal discourse.
---
Common Confusion
ENTENDMENT and INTENDMENT are not two distinct concepts — they are the same concept at different stages of linguistic history. ENTENDMENT is the older, French-derived spelling; INTENDMENT is the Latinized form that displaced it. Researchers encountering ENTENDMENT in early legal texts should not treat it as a separate doctrine or a term of art distinguishable from intendment. The two words are interchangeable in meaning, differing only in age and orthographic origin. Confusion arises most often when a researcher indexes or searches for one form without anticipating the other.
---
Why It Matters in Research
ENTENDMENT is a navigational trap precisely because it looks like a misspelling or scribal variant rather than a meaningful legal term. Researchers working in early English legal sources — year books, early treatises, Coke, Cowell's Interpreter, or any pre-eighteenth-century legal text — will encounter ENTENDMENT where a modern source would say intendment, construction, or meaning. Failing to recognize the equivalence can cause a researcher to miss substantive interpretive arguments embedded in historical materials.
The more practically important research path runs in the opposite direction: researchers investigating the doctrine of INTENDMENT (the law's presumption of the most reasonable or favorable interpretation of language) must be alert to the fact that older sources will use ENTENDMENT to describe the same doctrine. Any corpus search on interpretive methodology in early legal texts should include both spellings as search terms.
The Rapalje & Lawrence entry is a useful reminder of how legal dictionaries handle obsolete terms: it redirects to INTENDMENT without elaborating, which is the appropriate editorial move but can strand a researcher who does not follow the cross-reference. Burrill's is more instructive, tracing the French lineage and pointing back to Cowell, who is the primary authority on the term's use.
There is no recorded jurisdictional variation because the term had already become obsolete before American law developed its own distinct legal vocabulary. It is exclusively a term of English legal history.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries are in complete agreement on this term, which is unusual enough to be worth noting. Black's (both first and second editions) and Burrill's Law Dictionary reproduce substantially identical definitions, each attributing the usage to Cowell and each characterizing ENTENDMENT as the old form of INTENDMENT derived directly from the French. Rapalje & Lawrence declines to define the term independently and redirects immediately to INTENDMENT, which is editorially consistent with the other sources even if less informative.
Burrill adds slight value by explicitly citing the French source word, *entendement*, which places the term in the broader context of Norman French's influence on English legal vocabulary — the same channel through which dozens of archaic legal terms entered the common law tradition.
None of the historical sources treat ENTENDMENT as having any scope of meaning beyond its French-derived signification of legal understanding or construction. There is no evidence in any of these dictionaries that the term was ever used to denote a procedural concept, a substantive right, or anything beyond interpretive methodology. The scholarly consensus is narrow and stable.
What the historical dictionaries do not address — and what a researcher should keep in mind — is the practical doctrine that traveled under this name. The concept of legal intendment (every reasonable presumption being made in favor of validity, or words being read according to their most natural legal sense) was a live and important interpretive principle in early common law. The term ENTENDMENT may be the historical container, but the doctrine it carried was substantive. Researchers should consult the INTENDMENT entry for that doctrinal content.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Intendment; Rules of Construction and Interpretation.
---