Definition
In copyright law, engraving refers to the art or process of producing incised or raised patterns, lines, characters, or designs on a hard material — typically a metal plate or wood block — from which printed impressions may be taken. The term describes both the process and the resulting work product. As a copyright subject matter category, engraving historically covered pictorial illustrations and works connected with the fine arts, and was generally distinguished from purely textual reproduction. Photographic reproduction of pictures, even where the output resembles an engraved print, was not treated as engraving under early copyright doctrine.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): The present participle and gerund of "engrave" — the act of cutting or carving designs into a surface.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): The act or art of producing incised or raised patterns on hard material, especially metal plates or wood blocks, for surface decoration or for printing; also, the engraved plate or the print made from it.
The ordinary meaning and the legal meaning are closely aligned, but the legal definition carries a specific limiting function: it defines the outer boundary of a copyright category. Knowing that engraving, in legal usage, excludes photography and is restricted to fine arts contexts is essential for interpreting early copyright statutes and cases — a distinction the common definition does not carry.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in 19th-century U.S. copyright law will encounter "engraving" as a formal statutory category, not merely a descriptive label. Early federal copyright acts enumerated protected works by type — maps, charts, books, prints, engravings — and the scope of each category was actively litigated. Whether a particular work qualified as an "engraving" determined whether it received any protection at all.
The key trap in historical sources is the boundary dispute between engraving and photography. Courts in the mid-to-late 19th century wrestled with whether photographic processes could produce a "print" or "engraving" within the meaning of copyright statutes, ultimately concluding they could not under the older categorical framework. This means that a researcher reading a case about image reproduction and copyright must carefully identify which category is at issue and whether the analysis turns on the engraving definition or on a later, broader statutory category.
Anderson's entry cross-references COPYRIGHT and PRINT, signaling that engraving does not stand alone — its legal meaning is fully intelligible only in relation to the surrounding statutory scheme and the adjacent categories those terms describe. Following those cross-references is not optional context; it is necessary to reconstruct the full doctrinal picture.
Researchers should also note that the scope of "engraving" as a copyright category effectively collapsed as statutory language modernized. By the time the Copyright Act of 1909 and, later, the Copyright Act of 1976 were enacted, the categorical enumeration approach gave way to broader subject matter classifications. Historical cases construing "engraving" are therefore authoritative only for their era and should not be imported into analysis of modern copyright categories without care.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) provides the most substantive treatment, defining engraving as the art of producing incised or raised patterns from which an impression is taken, expressly restricting the term to pictorial illustrations or works in the fine arts, and excluding photographic reproduction. The citation to Wood v. Abbott grounds this exclusion in actual judicial reasoning, which is useful: it confirms the definition was not merely theoretical but was applied by federal courts to limit coverage.
Anderson's Dictionary of Law offers no independent definition, routing the reader instead to COPYRIGHT and PRINT. This cross-referencing approach, while unhelpful in isolation, reflects the practical reality that "engraving" in legal usage derived its meaning from the statutory scheme rather than from any inherent content of the word itself.
Neither source addresses the evolution of engraving as a copyright category over time, nor do they flag the eventual obsolescence of the term as a discrete statutory classification. Modern researchers should treat both entries as reflecting late-19th-century doctrine only.
Webster's 1913 definition aligns closely with Black's technical description of the process, confirming that the legal definition borrowed from craft and trade usage rather than inventing a specialized legal meaning from scratch.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Engraving as a formal copyright category was a creature of federal law under the early U.S. copyright statutes. Its interpretation was therefore developed primarily in federal courts. State law is not a meaningful variable for this term in its primary legal context.
---