Definition
Enda in scaccario (also rendered "ne placita teneantur in scaccario" in related writs) was an ancient English writ directed to the treasurer and barons of the Exchequer, commanding them not to hold pleas between common persons in that court where neither party belonged to it. "Common persons" here means private individuals who were not debtors to the Crown — the Exchequer's original and proper jurisdiction extended only to matters touching the king's revenue, and to suits by or against those who owed debts to the king. The writ served as a jurisdictional check, preventing the Exchequer from drawing in ordinary civil litigation that properly belonged to the common law courts.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term appears almost exclusively in historical sources dealing with the jurisdiction of the English Exchequer of Pleas and the procedural mechanisms used to police that jurisdiction. Researchers encountering it in medieval or early modern legal records should understand its narrow context: the writ was a remedy for parties — or for the common law courts themselves — when the Exchequer overreached by entertaining suits between private litigants who had no connection to the king's revenue.
The key research trap is conflating the Exchequer's dual character. The Exchequer functioned as both a revenue court and, increasingly from the thirteenth century onward, a court of common pleas for private parties who invoked the "debtor to the king" fiction to gain access to its process. Enda in scaccario was one mechanism designed to resist that jurisdictional expansion. By the time Blackstone and later commentators were writing, the Exchequer of Pleas had effectively established itself as a general common law court alongside King's Bench and Common Pleas, making the writ largely obsolete. Sources written after the mid-seventeenth century may reference it only as a historical curiosity.
Researchers using Registrum Omnium Brevium (Reg. Orig.) — the primary source cited in both Black's editions — should note that the Register of Writs documents forms that were theoretically available, not necessarily writs in regular use. The appearance of enda in scaccario in the Register does not indicate frequent deployment in practice.
The term will surface in corpus searches relating to: Exchequer jurisdiction, writs of prohibition, prerogative courts, and the history of the English revenue courts. It connects directly to the broader contest between the Exchequer and the courts of Common Pleas and King's Bench over jurisdictional territory.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both Black's first and second editions provide nearly identical entries, each citing Registrum Omnium Brevium 187 and Blackstone's Commentaries (specifically "Comm. 168," which the first edition references but the second edition drops from the text). The definitions agree on every material point: the writ's target (treasurer and barons of the Exchequer), its command (forbid pleas between common persons), and its rationale (the Exchequer's original jurisdiction was limited to the king's debtors).
Neither edition expands on the writ's procedural mechanics, its relationship to the writ of prohibition more generally, or the historical circumstances that gave rise to it. Both treatments are compressed to the point of being reference-only entries, useful for identification but not for substantive analysis. Researchers needing fuller treatment should consult Blackstone's Commentaries on the jurisdiction of the Exchequer directly, and Holdsworth's History of English Law for the Exchequer's jurisdictional evolution.
The slight textual corruption in the first edition ("ancient Comm. 168" appearing mid-sentence, suggesting a typesetting artifact) is worth flagging for researchers relying on that edition's text: the citation to Blackstone's Commentaries is real, but the printed entry appears to have run text from adjacent entries together.
---
Jurisdictional Note
This writ is specific to the English legal system and has no American counterpart. It predates the founding and was rendered obsolete in England by the Courts (Exchequer Division) Act 1873, which merged the Exchequer of Pleas into the new High Court of Justice. It is purely a historical research term.
---