Definition
Having at least two distinct legal senses, the term ELECTIVE functions as an adjective describing either (1) something that arises from, depends upon, or is conferred by an act of choice or election, or (2) something that pertains to the process of voting or to elections generally.
1. Dependent upon choice or election. A right, office, benefit, or legal status is elective when it comes into existence or passes to a person through an act of selection rather than by automatic operation of law, inheritance, or appointment. A corporate board seat filled by shareholder vote, a public office filled at a general election, and a surviving spouse's statutory right to take against a will (the "elective share") are all elective in this sense.
2. Pertaining to elections or the electoral process. Statutes, constitutional provisions, and administrative rules governing the conduct of elections, the qualifications of voters, or the mechanics of voting are described as "elective" in the sense of being election-related. The elective franchise—the right to vote at lawfully authorized elections—is the canonical compound using the term in this sense.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Of or pertaining to voting or elections; involving a choice between options; open to freely chosen selection; in medical contexts, scheduled and nonemergent.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Exerting or involving the power of choice; dependent on choice; pertaining to elections and the right of choosing.
The gap between common and legal usage is modest but worth noting. In everyday modern English, "elective" most often appears in two non-legal contexts: academic course selection ("an elective class") and medicine ("elective surgery"). Neither usage maps cleanly onto the legal senses. A researcher encountering the term in a legal text should not assume that "elective" simply means "optional" or "unnecessary"—in law it typically signals that something originates in or depends upon an affirmative act of choice by a specific party or the electorate, carrying formal legal consequences.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
Elective franchise. The right of a qualified voter to cast a ballot at a lawfully authorized election. Treated historically as a civil right of considerable weight; legislative or administrative interference with it has generated significant litigation.
Elective office. A public office filled by vote of the electorate, as distinguished from an appointive office. The distinction matters for constitutional eligibility requirements, removal procedures, and civil service protections.
Elective share (also statutory share or forced share). The portion of a decedent's estate that a surviving spouse may claim by election under state statute, overriding the terms of a will. Though not named in the historical sources reproduced here, this is among the most frequently litigated uses of "elective" in modern estate law.
Elective remedies. A party who chooses between two inconsistent legal remedies—treating a contract as rescinded versus suing for damages on it, for example—is said to make an election of remedies. Once made, the election may bind the party going forward.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The term is a functional adjective that gains its meaning almost entirely from context. Researchers should identify which domain they are working in before reading any source.
Probate and estates. The elective share is probably the most litigated modern use of the word "elective" in private law. State statutes vary substantially in how they define the elective share, whether it applies to nonprobate transfers, and what procedural steps the surviving spouse must take. A source using "elective" in an estates context almost certainly refers to this election, not to voting.
Election law and administrative law. Sources dealing with the franchise, voter qualifications, election administration, and ballot access use "elective" in its governmental sense. The historical sources here—including the citation to Parks v. State and People v. Barber in Black's 2nd edition—are rooted in this domain. Nineteenth and early twentieth century materials in this area will reflect a much narrower conception of who held the elective franchise, making historical sources unreliable as statements of current law.
Contracts and remedies. "Elective" in the remedies context is often replaced in modern usage by "election of remedies" as a compound noun. Researchers should check both the adjectival and noun forms.
Constitutional research. The elective franchise receives protection under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, the Voting Rights Act, and state constitutional provisions. Materials discussing the "elective franchise" as a constitutional right require attention to which source of law is being invoked, since state constitutional protections may be broader or narrower than federal floors.
Jurisdictional traps. Because "elective share" is entirely a creature of state statute, descriptions of the elective share in general legal dictionaries or older treatises may not reflect the law of any particular jurisdiction. The Uniform Probate Code framework has been adopted in some states but not others, creating significant variation.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's define "elective" consistently as "dependent upon choice; bestowed or passing by election," with the secondary meaning of pertaining to elections or conferring the right to vote. The two editions are in close agreement and reflect the late nineteenth and early twentieth century legal vocabulary without substantial change.
Notably, neither edition of Black's addresses the elective share in the estates sense—an omission that reflects both the period of the dictionaries and the subsequent statutory development of forced share protections for surviving spouses. Researchers using these historical sources for probate research should supplement them with modern statutory analysis and treatises.
The citation in Black's 2nd edition to Parks v. State, 100 Ala. 634, 13 So. 756, and People v. Barber, 48 Hun (N.Y.), supports the elective franchise definition and situates the term firmly in the election law context for that edition. These cases are period-specific and should not be used to state current constitutional or statutory standards for voter rights.
Webster's 1913 and the two Black's editions share a common core meaning, suggesting the term was stable across legal and lay usage in this period. The modern divergence into medical and academic usage (elective surgery, elective coursework) is a post-1913 development with no legal significance.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The elective share—a surviving spouse's right to claim a statutory portion of the estate against the will—varies significantly across U.S. states in percentage, the asset base against which it is calculated, and the procedural requirements for exercising it. Some states follow an augmented estate model; others use simpler formulas. Research into any specific elective share claim must begin with the controlling state statute, not general dictionary or treatise definitions.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
For the electoral and franchise sense: Election Administration, Voting Technology, and Post-Election Disputes (The Law Mind Administrative Law & Government Encyclopedia) [admin_157]
For the remedies sense: Defenses — Waiver and Election of Remedies (The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia) [contracts_35]; Remedies — Overview and Election of Remedies (The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia) [contracts_77]
---