EDIFICIUM - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

EDIFICIUMAuthored

The Law Mind • 811 words

Definition

In Roman and civil law, a building or structure. The term denotes a constructed edifice considered as a legal unit of property, with particular significance for determining what objects constitute component parts of the building and what objects remain legally separate.

The operative distinction turns on a building's integrity: things removed from a building with the intention of returning them are treated as still belonging to the building and thus share its legal character. Things merely prepared or made ready to be incorporated into a building — but not yet attached — do not yet acquire that character. The building, as a legal object, is defined not purely by physical attachment at any given moment but by the relationship between the object and the structure's ongoing identity.

Common Confusion

EDIFICIUM should not be confused with ÆDIFICATIO (the act of building) or with ÆDIFICIUM used in a purely architectural sense. In legal contexts, the significance of the term is not descriptive — it is classificatory. The question is not whether something looks like a building but whether a given object falls within the legal ambit of the edificium for purposes of ownership, transfer, or obligation. Researchers conflating the descriptive and legal senses may misread passages in the Digest and related civil law sources.

Why It Matters in Research

This term operates at the intersection of Roman property law and the civil law of fixtures — a genealogy that runs forward into continental legal systems and, more indirectly, into common law fixture doctrine. Researchers working in historical property law, mixed civil-common law jurisdictions (Louisiana, Quebec, South Africa, Scotland), or comparative law will encounter EDIFICIUM as the doctrinal ancestor of modern fixture analysis.

The key research trap: sources discussing detachment and reattachment of building components may appear to be about physical condition when they are actually resolving a legal question about ownership and classification. The Digest formulation preserved in Burrill — that things removed for the purpose of return remain part of the building — encodes an intent-and-purpose test that prefigures later fixture doctrine's emphasis on intention of annexation. Researchers should read EDIFICIUM passages with that functional frame in mind, not a purely spatial one.

A second trap involves completeness of source coverage. Burrill's entry is truncated — the entry cuts off mid-sentence, omitting the conclusion of the maxim. Researchers relying solely on Burrill for this term should consult the Digest directly (particularly D.19.1 and related titles on sale and delivery of buildings and their components) to recover the full text.

Historical Dictionary Support

Burrill is the primary source in the Law Mind corpus for this term. His entry correctly identifies EDIFICIUM as a civil law term and introduces the operative distinction between components detached for return and materials merely prepared for incorporation. The Latin maxim he quotes — ea quæ ex ædificio detracta sunt, ut reponantur, ædificii sunt — captures the functional, intent-based logic of the Roman approach.

However, Burrill's entry is incomplete as it appears in the corpus; the sentence and the entry break off before the full legal consequence is stated. This is a meaningful gap: the truncated text establishes half of the distinction (things detached for return remain part of the building) but the surviving text only begins to articulate the counterpart rule (things merely prepared for incorporation are not yet part of the building). A researcher working only from Burrill has the analytical framework but not its full articulation.

No other Law Mind shelf source provides a competing or supplementary definition for this term. The term does not appear in common law dictionaries of the Bouvier or Black tradition with the same doctrinal weight, reflecting that EDIFICIUM is a civil law concept that never received direct transplantation into English common law vocabulary.

Jurisdictional Note

EDIFICIUM as a technical legal term operates primarily within civil law systems and mixed jurisdictions. In Louisiana, Quebec, and Scots law, the conceptual framework it represents — the legal unity of a building and the rules for classifying components — remains active doctrine, though expressed in modern statutory or codal language. Common law researchers encountering the term in historical texts should treat it as a civil law borrowing rather than a common law native term.

Encyclopedia Cross-Reference

Law Mind Encyclopedia — Fixtures (doctrine of what constitutes part of realty)
Law Mind Encyclopedia — Roman Property Law (civil law classification of things)

EDIFICIUMmain

Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1867

Lat. [see ædificare.] In the civil law. A building, (edifice.) Ea quæ ex ædificio detracta sunt, ut reponantur, ædificii sunt, at quæ parata sunt ut imponantur, non sunt ædificii; those things which are taken away from a building in order to be [with a view to their being] returned to their place, are a part of the building; but things which are made ready for putting into the building, are not a part of it. Dig. 19. 1. 17. 10. See Cod. 8. 10. Edificia solo cedunt. Buildings belong to [go with] the soil. Fleta, lib. 3, c. 2, § 12. ÆDILE. [Lat. ædilis, from ædes, a house or building.] In the Roman law. A magistrate who had the supervision of buildings, (qui ædibus præessent, Dig. 1. 2. 2. 21;) streets, markets, sewers, &c. ÆDILITIUM EDICTUM. Lat. In the Roman law. The Edilitian Edict; an edict providing remedies for frauds in sales, the execution of which belonged to the curule ædiles. Dig. 21. 1. See Cod. 4. 58. EDITUS, Editus. Lat. In old English law. Born. Bract. fol. 70 a, 278 a. Passed, as a statute; put forth, or promulgated. See Editus. ÆGROTO. Lat. [abl. of ægrotus, sick.] Being sick or indisposed. A term used in some of the older reports. "Holt ægroto." 11 Mod. 179. AEL, Ail. L. Fr. A grandfather. Britt. c. 89, fol. 221. See Aieul, Ayle. Aele; a grandmother. Britt. ub. sup. EQUITAS, Equitas. Lat. [from æquus, equal, even; Gr. intétкcia.] In the civil law. Equity, as opposed to strictum or summum jus, (q. v.) Otherwise called æquum, æquum bonum, æquum et bonum, æquum et justum. Calv. Lex. Equitas is not enumerated among the several species of law, either in the Digests or Institutes; but the term frequently occurs in the Roman law. Tayl. Civ. Law, 90. Brissonius. Cod. 1. 14. Grotius defines it virtus voluntatis, correctrix ejus in quo lex propter universalitatem deficit; a virtue of the will, the corrector of that wherein the law, by reason of its universality, is deficient. De Equitate, § 3. See 1 Bl. Com. 61. In old English law. Equity. Bract. fol. 3 a. Dicitur æquitas quasi æqualitas; it is called equity, being as it were equality. Id. ibid. See Equity. Equitas est rerum convenientia, quæ in paribus causis, paria desiderat jura, et omnia bene coæquiparat; equity is the fitting together, or adjustment of things, which, under equal [the same] circumstances, requires equal [the same] rules, and properly equalizes all things. Id. ibid. This definition is quoted by Lord Coke, though with considerable verbal alteration. Co. Litt. 24 b. Equitas est correctio legis generaliter latæ, quâ parte deficit; equity is the correction of a law passed in general terms, in the part where it is defective.* Plowd. 375. Branch's Princ. Equitas est correctio quædam legi adhibita, quia ab eá abest aliquid propter generalem sine exceptione comprehensionem; equity is a certain correction applied to a law where something is wanting to it, on account of its general comprehensiveness making no exception. Id. Equitas est perfecta quadam ratio quæ jus scriptum interpretatur et emendat; nulla scriptura comprehensa, sed solum in verâ ratione consistens; equity is a certain perfect reason, which interprets and amends the written law; comprehended in no writing, but consisting in right reason alone. Co. Litt. 24 b. Equitas est verborum legis sufficiens [efficacius] directio, qua una res solummodo cavetur verbis, ut omnis alia in æquali genere, iisdem caveatur verbis; equity is the proper application of the words of the law, where one thing only is provided for in terms, in order that every other thing of the same kind may be provided for by those same words. Branch's Princ.* Plowd. 467.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In