Definition
An easement is a nonpossessory right to use another person's real property for a specific, limited purpose. The holder of an easement does not own the land subject to it — they hold only the right of use. The land burdened by the easement is called the servient estate (or servient tenement); the land benefited, if any, is called the dominant estate (or dominant tenement).
Easements are interests in land, not merely personal permissions. They are legally distinct from licenses (which are revocable) and from profits à prendre (which include a right to take something from the land, such as timber or minerals).
The defining characteristics of an easement:
- It is a right to use, not a right to possess or exclude others generally.
- It must be for a definite, limited purpose (a right of way, drainage, utilities access, light and air, etc.).
- It is enforceable against successors in title to the servient estate, provided it runs with the land or is properly recorded.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "An interest in land which grants the legal right to use another person's real property, generally in order to cross a part of the property or to gain access to something on the property (right of way)." Also: "Easing; relief; assistance; support."
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "That which gives ease, relief, or assistance; convenience; accommodation... A liberty, privilege, or advantage, which one proprietor has in the estate of another proprietor, distinct from the ownership of the soil, as a way, water course, etc."
The ordinary English senses — comfort, relief, convenience — survive as faint echoes of the legal term's origins. A researcher reading older legal texts should note that when courts or treatises use "easement" in an apparently general sense (ease of passage, accommodation), they are almost certainly invoking the technical property concept. The Webster's 1913 definition reflects the legal meaning more accurately than the modern common usage, which has narrowed to right-of-way scenarios and misses the full range of easement types.
---
Common Confusion
EASEMENT vs. LICENSE: A license is a personal, revocable permission to use land. It creates no property interest and does not bind successors. An easement is a property interest that does. The distinction matters enormously in research: courts frequently litigated whether an arrangement was an easement or a license, particularly in railroad corridor cases and neighbor disputes of the 19th century.
EASEMENT vs. COVENANT/SERVITUDE: Restrictive covenants and equitable servitudes govern what a landowner may not do with their property; easements govern an affirmative right of use by another. Both run with the land under certain conditions, but their creation, enforcement, and extinguishment follow different rules. Historical sources sometimes blur this line, particularly in civil-law-influenced jurisdictions.
EASEMENT APPURTENANT vs. EASEMENT IN GROSS: An easement appurtenant benefits a neighboring parcel (dominant estate) and transfers automatically with that parcel. An easement in gross benefits a person or entity, not adjacent land — utility line easements and pipeline rights-of-way are the clearest modern examples. Historical sources, including Rapalje & Lawrence, note that English common law once disfavored or refused to recognize easements in gross at all, while American courts and statutes have broadly accepted them.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
Easement Appurtenant: Benefits an identified dominant tenement; runs with the land on both sides of the relationship.
Easement in Gross: Benefits a person or entity rather than adjacent land. Commercial easements in gross (utility, pipeline, railroad) are generally assignable; personal easements in gross may not be.
Prescriptive Easement: Acquired by open, notorious, adverse, and continuous use over a statutory period — the easement equivalent of adverse possession. See The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: Creation by Prescription.
Easement by Implication: Arises from the circumstances of a conveyance when a use was apparent and continuous at the time of severance of common ownership, even without express grant.
Easement by Necessity: Created by law when a parcel would otherwise be landlocked following division of common ownership. Courts impose it as a matter of public policy.
Express Easement: Created by deed, will, or written instrument. The most straightforward form for title research.
Conservation Easement: A modern statutory form in which a landowner voluntarily restricts development or use of property, typically in favor of a land trust or government entity. Functions very differently from traditional easements. See The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: Utility Easements and Conservation Easements.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Terminology shifts significantly across periods. Nineteenth-century sources, including Burrill and Bouvier, regularly use "servitude" interchangeably with "easement," drawing on civil law vocabulary. Researchers working in Louisiana, California, or other civil-law-influenced jurisdictions will find "servitude" as the operative term in both statutes and cases where a common law jurisdiction would use "easement."
Easements in gross are a trap in historical research. The classical English rule, reflected in Bracton and echoed by Rapalje & Lawrence, was that easements could not be created in gross — they required a dominant tenement. American courts departed from this early and broadly, but the rule created genuine uncertainty in 19th-century cases. If a historical court appears to refuse to recognize an easement, this doctrine may explain why.
Extinguishment is underreported in titles. Easements can be extinguished by merger (when dominant and servient estates come under common ownership), abandonment, release, prescription, or estoppel. Historical deeds often omit extinguishment events. Researchers examining chain of title should look not only for the grant of an easement but for any subsequent instruments that might have ended it.
Recording acts interact with easements in complex ways. Whether an unrecorded easement binds a subsequent purchaser depends on the applicable recording statute (race, notice, or race-notice) and whether the purchaser had constructive or inquiry notice from visible use. This is a frequent litigation issue in 19th- and early 20th-century cases in the corpus.
The corpus contains substantial litigation over railroad and utility corridor easements, where the distinction between fee simple title and easement in gross was heavily disputed and the consequences for reversion upon abandonment were significant.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries converge on the core definition with unusual consistency. Black's (both editions), Bouvier's, and Burrill all adopt substantially the same formulation from Washburn's Real Property: a right in the owner of one parcel to use the land of another for a special purpose not inconsistent with general ownership. This cross-source uniformity reflects Washburn's dominance as the standard American real property treatise of the period.
Burrill's definition is the most precise of the group: "a liberty, privilege or advantage in land, without profit, existing distinct from an ownership of the soil." The phrase "without profit" is doing important work — it distinguishes easements from profits à prendre, where the holder may take something from the land itself. This distinction is frequently relevant in cases involving timber rights, mineral access, and grazing.
Rapalje & Lawrence provide the only historical dictionary entry that addresses the in-gross limitation directly, noting Bracton's statement that an easement might not at one time be created in gross — a useful flag for researchers encountering English authorities on this point.
What the historical dictionaries largely omit: prescriptive easements receive scant attention relative to their litigation frequency; conservation easements are entirely absent (a 20th-century development); and the interaction of easements with recording statutes is not addressed, which reflects the treatise-era assumption that real property law operated independently of recording regimes.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Louisiana treats easements as "predial servitudes" or "personal servitudes" under the Civil Code, and the terminology, creation rules, and classification schemes differ materially from common law states. Researchers working in Louisiana sources should approach the civil law framework on its own terms rather than mapping common law easement doctrine onto it. Several other states with Spanish or French colonial histories show hybrid influences in early case law.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia:
- Easements — Utility Easements and Conservation Easements (property_76)
- Easements — Transfer and Assignment of Easements (property_74)
- Easements — Creation by Prescription (Prescriptive Easement) (property_72)
---