Definition
An archaic and largely obsolete legal term denoting people who dwell on hilly places or mountains. The term appears in early English legal usage as a descriptive classification of persons by their place of habitation—specifically, those residing in upland or mountainous terrain. It carries no modern doctrinal meaning and survives only as a historical curiosity in older legal dictionaries, where it was preserved from Jacob's Law Dictionary.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering DUNSETS in historical sources should treat it as a descriptive geographical classification rather than a term of legal art with procedural or substantive consequences. It is not a term of tenure, status, or liability in any recognized common law doctrine.
The primary research trap is misreading surrounding dictionary text. Both editions of Black's Law Dictionary embed DUNSETS in close proximity to two unrelated Latin maxims: *Duo non possunt in solido unam rem possidere* ("Two cannot possess one thing in entirety," Co. Litt. 368) and *Duo sunt instrumenta ad omnes res aut confirmandas aut impugnandas, ratio et authoritas* ("There are two instruments for confirming or impugning all things—reason and authority," 8 Coke 16). These maxims are entirely independent entries and share no conceptual connection to DUNSETS. The alphabetical compression of early dictionary formats placed them on the same page or in the same block of text, which can mislead researchers scanning for context. Do not read the Latin maxims as elaborations of DUNSETS.
The term is attributed in both Black's editions to Jacob—a reference to Giles Jacob's *New Law Dictionary* (various editions, 18th century), one of the foundational English legal dictionaries from which later compilers, including Black, drew extensively. Researchers tracing the term's lineage should consult Jacob directly rather than treating Black's as the primary source.
DUNSETS has no meaningful presence in case law, statutory history, or modern legal usage. Its value is almost exclusively as a window into the breadth of early English legal vocabulary and the habit of older legal dictionaries to catalog social and demographic classifications that never crystallized into doctrine.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's Law Dictionary reproduce the definition identically in substance: "People that dwell on hilly places or mountains," with attribution to Jacob. The first and second editions differ only in a typographical discrepancy in the citation to Co. Litt.—the first edition gives "368" while the second gives "868," the latter almost certainly a printing error given that the Co. Litt. citation in context relates to the neighboring maxim on joint possession, not to DUNSETS itself.
Neither edition provides any elaboration, cross-reference, or doctrinal application. The brevity is telling: Black's preserved the term as part of a comprehensive vocabulary project rather than because it served any active legal function. Historical dictionaries of this era routinely incorporated terms from feudal, ecclesiastical, and customary sources that had long since passed out of active use, and DUNSETS appears to be one such relic.
What the historical sources do not provide: any explanation of how the classification functioned in practice, whether it conferred privileges, disabilities, or customs, or how it related to parallel classifications such as bordars, cottars, or villeins in feudal land tenure. Jacob's original entry, which lies behind the Black's definition, would be the natural next step for a researcher seeking additional context, though a full account of the term's legal significance—if it ever had one—likely requires consultation of pre-modern English local history and customary law sources rather than legal dictionaries alone.
---