Definition
Double value is a statutory penalty imposed on a tenant who wrongfully holds over after receiving proper notice to quit from the landlord. Upon receiving notice to quit and failing to vacate by the required date, the tenant becomes liable to the landlord for double the annual value of the premises for every year the wrongful holdover continues. The remedy is punitive in character, designed to deter tenants from ignoring valid notices and to compensate landlords for the disruption caused by an unlawful retention of possession.
The penalty is distinct from ordinary rent or mesne profits. It does not merely require the tenant to pay the rental value of the property — it imposes a multiplied liability as punishment for the specific wrong of ignoring a notice to quit.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): No standard entry. "Double value" in ordinary speech would suggest twice the monetary worth of something.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not defined as a legal term of art; "value" carries its ordinary sense of monetary worth or utility.
Editorial note: The common-language reading — that "double value" means simply twice what something is worth — captures the arithmetic but misses the legal trigger. The penalty attaches not upon any holding over, but specifically upon a holding over after notice to quit has been properly given. Without that notice, no double value liability arises. The notice requirement is the operative legal condition that ordinary usage obscures.
---
Common Confusion
DOUBLE VALUE / DOUBLE RENT: These terms are frequently conflated in historical sources and even in some older American cases. Double rent was a separate English statutory penalty, arising under different circumstances, sometimes applicable where a tenant gave notice of intention to quit but then held over without having given proper notice to the landlord. The two penalties have different statutory origins, different triggering conditions, and different histories of American reception. The conflation in secondary sources is common enough that researchers should verify which penalty is actually being discussed before relying on a given source's treatment of either term.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Double value is an archaic English statutory remedy with a specific legislative origin. Researchers working with pre-twentieth-century landlord-tenant materials, property law treatises, or English common law sources will encounter this term most frequently. Several navigational points matter:
**The statutory anchor is English.** The penalty derives from 4 Geo. II, c. 28, § 1 (1731), a specific English parliamentary enactment. When historical sources cite "double value" without elaboration, they are almost always invoking this statute or its direct American legislative descendants. Researchers should not assume the rule exists as pure common law — it is statute-based, and its availability in any American jurisdiction depends on whether that jurisdiction adopted equivalent legislation.
**Distinguish double value from double rent.** These two penalties are related but not identical. Double rent (also sometimes called "double rent" under different English statutes) can arise in slightly different holdover contexts and rests on distinct statutory authority. Some historical sources use the terms loosely or interchangeably; careful researchers must check the underlying statute being invoked. See DOUBLE RENT in this dictionary.
**Notice to quit is the essential trigger.** Historical case law and treatise discussion of double value almost always turns on whether notice to quit was validly given — its form, timing, and service. A researcher following a double value issue will quickly find themselves deep in the law of notice to quit.
**Modern relevance is limited but not zero.** American jurisdictions have largely replaced this type of statutory penalty with holdover tenant doctrines, month-to-month conversion rules, or landlord-tenant act remedies that provide their own damages formulas. Double value as a live cause of action is rare in modern American practice, but it appears throughout nineteenth-century American property law cases and remains relevant to historical legal research, property law history, and understanding the origins of holdover liability.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary identifies double value as a penalty on a tenant holding over after the landlord's notice to quit, grounding it explicitly in 4 Geo. II, c. 28, § 1. This entry is accurate as far as it goes but brief. It correctly locates the statutory source and identifies the essential structure of the remedy. What Black's does not elaborate is the procedural machinery — the notice requirements, the period of calculation, or the interaction with other holdover remedies — all of which occupied considerable space in nineteenth-century English and American treatise literature on landlord and tenant law. Researchers who find the Black's entry should treat it as a starting point and consult period property law treatises for the full operational picture.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Double value as a named statutory remedy is largely a creature of English law and its direct American colonial and early republic descendants. American jurisdictions vary significantly in whether they ever adopted equivalent legislation, and modern landlord-tenant statutes have generally displaced or superseded any such provisions. Researchers working in a specific American jurisdiction should look to that state's early landlord-tenant statutes and property law history rather than assuming the English rule applied.
---