or residence of a party, as distinguished from his temporary and transient though actual place of residence. One is his legal residence as distinguished from his temporary place of abode; in other words, one is his home, as distinguished from the place or places to which business or pleasure may temporarily call him.1 Primarily a person's domicil is his legal home; but domicil implies more than mere residence in a country.2 The domicil of a person may be in one place and his residence in another.3 sable: residence in the new locality, and the intention to remain there, facto et animo. Mere absence from a fixed home, however long continued, cannot work the change. Among the circumstances usually relied upon to establish the animus manendi are: declarations, exercise of political rights, payment of personal taxes, a house of residence, a place of business.1 A change does not depend so much upon the intention to remain in the new place for a definite or an indefinite period, as upon its being without an intention to return to the former place of actual residence. An intention to return, however, at a remote or indefinite Residence, with no present intention of removal, period, will not control, if the other facts which conconstitutes domicil. "Domicil" has a fixed and definite signification. For the ordinary purposes of citizenship there are rules of general, if not of universal, acceptation applicable to it. "Citizenship," "habitancy" and "residence" are severally words which may in the particular case mean precisely the same as "domicil," but frequently they may have other and inconsistent meanings, and while in one use of language the expressions a change of domicil, of citizenship, of habitancy, of residence, are necessarily identical or synonymous, in a different use of language they import different ideas. In international law, domicil means a residence at a particular place, accompanied with positive or presumptive proof of intending to continue there for an unlimited time.. To ascertain this domicil, it is proper to take into consideration the situation, the employment, and the character of the individual; the trade in which he is engaged, the family he possesses, and the transitory or fixed character of his business are ingredients which may properly be weighed." Domicil is spoken of: as national, or that of a person's country, and opposed to domestic, or that of a subdivision of a country; as foreign, established in another state; as commercial, the place of one's trade or business; of birth, that of one's parents; acquired, vested by the law; by choice, selected of free will; by law, by operation of law. Once existing, a domicil continues until another is acquired; when a change is alleged the burden of proof rests upon the party making the allegation. To constitute a new domicil, two things are indispen1 Town of Salem v. Town of Lyme, 29 Conn. 79 (1860), Hinman, J. 2 McDonald v. Salem Capital Flour-Mills Co., 31 F. R. 577 (1887). Lyon v. Lyon, 30 Hun, 456 (1883); Foss v. Foss, 58 Ν. Η. 284 (1878), cases. 4 Lindsay v. Murphy, 76 Va. 430 (1882). Borland v. City of Boston, 132 Mass. 93 (1882), Lord, J. • Guier v. O'Daniel, 1 Binn. *350 (1806), Rush, P. J.; State v. Collector, 32 N. J. L. 194 (1867); Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 352 (1874). 'Livingstone v. Maryland Ins. Co., 7 Cranch, 542 (1813), Story, J.; The Venus, 8 Cranch, 278 (1814). stitute domicil all give the new residence the character of a permanent home and place of abode. The intention and actual fact of residence must concur, when such residence is not in its nature temporary. There is a right of election by expressed intention, only when the facts are to some extent ambiguous.2 A domicil of origin is presumed to be retained until residence elsewhere has been shown. A domicil of origin, or an acquired domicil, remains until a new one is acquired. A native domicil is not so easily changed as an acquired domicil, and is more easily lost. A man can have but one domicil at the same time for the same purpose.2 Domicil is acquired by residence and the animus manendi, the intent to remain. A wife's domicil is that of the husband; but she may acquire a separate one, whenever necessary or proper, as, for a suit in divorce,5 q. v. See also CITIZEN; LEX, Domicilii; RESIDE. Complete ownership; absolute property.6 The right in a corporeal thing, from which arises the power of disposition and of claiming it from others.7 Proximate dominion. Obtaining possession by delivery of a thing sold, which, 1 Mitchell v. United States, 21 Wall. 353, 352 (1874), cases, Swayne, J.; Desmare v. United States, 93 U. S. 609 (1876); Doyle v. Clark, 1 Flip. 537-38 (1876), cases; Lindsay v. Murphy, 76 Va. 430 (1882); 21 Cent. Law J. 430-32 (1885), cases - Solicitors Journal (London). 2 Hallet v. Bassett, 100 Mass. 170-71 (1868), cases, Colt, J.; Guier v. O'Daniel, 1 Am. Lead. Cas. 747-50, cases. • Ennis v. Smith (Kosciusko's Case), 14 How. 423 (1852). 4 Newton v. Commissioners, 100 U. S. 562 (1879), Swayne, J. • Cheever v. Wilson, 9 Wall. 124 (1869); Cheely v. Clayton, 110 U. S. 705 (1884), cases; 2 Bishop, Mar. & D. 475; 23 Alb. Law J. 86 (1881), cases. See generally 13 Am. Law Rev. 261-79 (1879), cases; 11 Cent. Law J. 421-25 (1880), cases; 1 Wall. Jr. 262; 7 Fla. 81, 152; 46 Ga. 277; 74 III. 314; 89 Ind. 177; 51 Iowa, 79; 20 La. 314; 26 id. 338; 52 Me. 165; 27 Miss. 718; 54 id. 310; 77 Mo. 678; 37 N. J. L. 495; 8 Wend. 142; 8 Paige, 524; 31 Barb. 476; 67 N. Y. 379; 71 Pa. 309; 42 Vt. 352. See 2 Bl. Com. Ch. I. Coles v. Perry, 7 Tex. 186 (1851), Hughes, S. J.