That place where a man has his true, fixed, and permanent home and principal establishment, and to which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning. 10 Mass. 188; 11 La. 175; 5 Metc. 187: 4 Barb. 505: Wall. Jr. 217;9 Ired. 99; 1 Tex. 673; 13 Me. 255; 27 Miss. 704; 1 Bosw. 673; 74 III. 312. The domicil of a person is that place or country in which his habitation is fixed, without any present intention of removing therefrom; [1892] 3 Ch. 180. Dicey defines domicil as, in general, the place or country which is in fact his perma- nent home, but is in some cases the place or country which, whether it be in fact his home or not, is determined to be his home by a rule of law; Dicey, Dom. 42; and again as "that place or country either (1) in which he in fact resides with the intention of resi- dence (animus manendi); or (2) in which, having so resided, be continues actually to reside, though no longer retaining the in- tention of residence (animus manendi); or (3) with regard to which, having so resided there, he retains the intention of residence (animus manendi), though he, in fact, no longer resides there:" id. 44. The same definition substantially is given in Dicey, Confi. Laws (Moore's ed.) 727. It is there said not to include cases of domicil created by operation of law. Other definitions are quoted in the same words with modification: Domicil is "a habitation fixed in some place with the intention of remaining there alway." Vattel, Droit des Gens, liv. i, c. xix, 8. 218, Du Domicile. "The place where a person has established the principal seat of his residence and of his business." Pothier, Introd. Gen. Cout. d'Orleans, ch. 1, 8. 1, art. 8. "That place is to be regarded as a man's domicil which he has freely chosen for his permanent abode [and thus for the centre at once of his legal relations and his busi- ness]." Savigny, s. 353. "That place is properly the domicil of a person in which his habitation is fixed, without any present intention of removing therefrom." "Story, Confl. Laws § 43. "A residence at a particular place, ac- companied with [positive or presumptive proof of] an intention to remain there for an unlimited time." Phillimore, Int. Law 49. "That place is properly the domicil of a person in which he has voluntarily fixed the habitation of himself and his family, not for a mere special and temporary pur- pose, but with a present intention of mak- ing it his permanent home, unless and un- til something (which is unexpected or un- certain) shall occur to induce him to adopt some other permanent home." 28 L. J. Ch. 361. 366, Der Kinderslev. V. C. One's domicil is the technically preeminent headquarters that every person is compelled to have in order that his rights and duties that have attached to it by the law may be determined. 232 U. S. 619. If the intention of permanently residing in a place exists, a residence in pursuance of that intention however short, will establish a domicil. L. R. 1 Sc. App. 307, 319, cited by Taylor, Int. Pub. Law 249. It has been said that there is no precise definition of the word; 25 L. J. Ch. 730; but Dicey (Domicil, App. and in his Confl. Laws 731) dissents from this statement. In the latter work the learned writer says that "the attempts which have been made to define domicil, and of the criticisms upon such attempts, lead to results which may be summed up as follows:- "First. Domicil, being a complex term, must. from the nature of things, be capable of definition. In other words, it is a term which has a meaning, and that meaning can be explained by analyzing it into its elements. "Secondly. All the best definitions agree in making the elements of domicil 'resi- dence' and 'animus manendi.' "Thirdly. Several of these definitions- such, for example, as Story's, Phillimore's, or Vice-Chancellor Kindersley's-have suc- ceeded in giving an explanation of the meaning of domicil, which, even if not ex- pressed in the most precise language, is substantially accurate. "Fourthly. The reason why English courts have been inclined to hold that no definition of domicil is satisfactory is, that they have found it impossible to reconcile any definition with three sets of judicial decisions or dicta (an officer in the service of the East India Company; an Englishman acquiring a domicil in another country; and a person residing in another country for his health). When, however, these sets are examined, it is found that two of them consist of cases embodying views of domicil now admitted to be erroneous, whilst the third set can be reconciled with all the best definitions of domicil." Dicey, Confl. Laws 735. A person must have a domicil for pur- poses of taxation; 1 Metc. 242; 132 Mass. 89; 42 Wis. 476; 49 Me. 367; for jurisdiction; 65 N. H. 248; for succession; 52 Me. 165; 76 Ala. 433; 53 N. Y. 556; for administration; 85 Pa. 466; for pauper settlement; 23 Pick. 177; for loyal character: 93 U. S. 605; for home- stead exemption; 20 Tex. 243; for attach- ment; 54 Miss.