An instrument in the form of a promissory note for the payment of "25.00 as per deed, 10 per cent. till paid," is a note for twenty-five dollars.1 Where a jury found "for the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and ninety-nine and 48-100," it was held that the omission of the word "dollars" was not such a defect as prevented rendering judgment according to the intent of the jury, although it would have been more regular to have amended the verdict before judgment.2 Any mark commonly employed in business transactions to denote the division of figures, obviously representing money, into dollars and cents, is sufficient for that purpose.3 "One dollar" - see CONSIDERATION, 2, Nominal. See generally CURRENCY; MONEY; TENDER, Legal; 1. Dominion, ownership, property; absolute proprietorship or right of control.6 Domain, eminent. The power to take private property for public uses is termed "the right of eminent domain." 7 1 State v. Schwartz, 64 Wis. 432 (1885). * Hopkins v. Orr, 124 U. S. 513 (1888), cases, Gray, J. 3 Delashmutt v. Sellwood, 10 Oreg. 325 (1882). 44 Bl. Com. 23. "Eminent" imports having preference, being para mount, prerogative, sovereign. All separate interests of individuals in property are held of the government under the implied reservation that the property may be taken for the public use, upon paying a fair compensation, whenever the public interest requires it. The possession is to be resumed in the manner directed by the constitution and laws.¹ The ultimate right of the sovereign power to appropriate, not only the public property, but the private property of all citizens within the territorial sovereignty, to public purposes. Vattel says that the right in society or the sovereign to dispose, in case of necessity, and for the public safety, of all the wealth (property) in the state, is "eminent domain," and a prerogative of majesty.2 In every political sovereign community there inheres, necessarily, the right and the duty of guarding its own existence, and of protecting and promoting the interests and welfare of the community at large. This power, denominated the "eminent domain" of the state, is, as its name imports, paramount to all private rights vested under the government, and these last are, by necessary implication, held in subordination to this power, and must yield in every instance to its proper exercise. The whole policy of the country relative to roads, mills, bridges, and canals rests upon this single power, under which lands have always been condemned; without the exertion of the power no one of these improvements could be constructed. The exercise of a franchise is subject to the power.3 The propriety of exercising the right is a political question-exclusively for the legislature to determine. The mode of exercising the right, in the absence of provision in the organic law prescribing a contrary course, is within the discretion of the legislature. If the purpose be a public one, and just compensation be paid or tendered the owner of the property taken, there is no limitation upon the power of the legislature.5 The right of eminent domain exists in the government of the United States, and may be exercised by it within the States, so far as is necessary to the enjoyment of the powers conferred by the Constitution. Such authority is essential to its independent existence and perpetuity. These cannot be preserved if the obstinacy of a private person, or if any other author1 Beekman v. Saratoga, &c. R. Co., 3 Paige, 72-73 (1831), Walworth, Ch.; Bloodgood v. Mohawk, &c. R. Co., 18 Wend. 13-18 (1837), cases. 2 Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 11 Pet. *641 (1837), Story, J. Vattel is also quoted in 109 U. S. 519, post. 3 West River Bridge Co. v. Dix, 6 How. 531-33 (1848), Daniel, J. 4 Hyde Park v. Cemetery Association, 119 Ill. 149 F. domaine, a lordship: L. dominium, right of (1886); 111 Mass. 125. ownership. Compare DEMESNE; DOMAIN. See 2 Bl. Com. 1. Secombe v. Milwaukee, &c. R. Co., 23 Wall. 118 (1874); People v. Smith, 21 Ν. Υ. 597-98 (1860); Holt v. 'United States v. Jones, 109 U. S. 518 (1883), Field, J. Council of Somerville, 127 Mass. 410, 413 (1879).