DISTRAIN - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

DISTRAINAuthored

The Law Mind • 1121 words

Definition

To distrain is to seize another person's property without prior legal process and hold it as a pledge or security, compelling the property owner to perform an obligation — most commonly payment of rent, taxes, or other duties — or face forfeiture of the seized goods. The act of distraining is the exercise of the remedy known as distress. The person distraining takes the property not as an owner but as a creditor holding collateral; the debtor may recover the property by performing the obligation or by having it replevied (reclaimed through court process) before the matter is resolved.

Historically, distraining served a broader range of enforcement purposes: securing a party's appearance in court, compelling performance of feudal services, and enforcing various dues owed to lords or the crown. Over time, its practical scope narrowed significantly. By the modern period, distraining is associated almost exclusively with a landlord's remedy for unpaid rent — and even that use has been substantially curtailed or abolished by statute in most common law jurisdictions.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): To seize somebody's property in place of, or to force, payment of a debt; also, archaic senses of squeezing, pressing, or tearing apart.

Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "To seize, as a pledge or indemnification; to take possession of as security for nonpayment of rent, the reparation of an injury done, etc." Webster's also preserves an obsolete sense — to constrain, torment, or bind — drawn from Chaucer.

The common and legal meanings are unusually close here, but the gap that matters is procedural: ordinary usage treats distraining as a generic act of seizure for debt, while the legal meaning carries a specific technical structure — no prior judicial authorization required, property held as pledge rather than transferred, and the remedy governed by rules distinct from execution or attachment. Researchers who read distrain as a synonym for "confiscate" or "garnish" will misread the legal sources.

Common Confusion

DISTRAIN vs. DISTRESS: These terms are closely related but not interchangeable. To distrain is the verb — the act of seizing. Distress is the noun — the remedy itself, the name for the legal proceeding, and also the term for the property seized. Historical sources use both freely, and the entries in Black's and Bouvier's cross-reference each other constantly. A researcher who finds "distrain" in older materials should follow that thread to the distress entries for the full doctrinal picture.

DISTRAIN vs. ATTACHMENT / EXECUTION: All three involve seizing property to satisfy an obligation, but attachment and execution require prior judicial process. Distraining is a self-help remedy exercised by the creditor (typically a landlord) directly, without a court order. Conflating these in historical research produces serious errors about what procedural protections applied and when.

Why It Matters in Research

The term distrain is a reliable marker of pre-modern landlord-tenant and feudal service law. When it appears in older primary sources — Year Books, early American case reports, colonial statutes — researchers should treat it as an entry point into the full distress doctrine, not a standalone concept. The remedy of distress was subject to elaborate common law rules about what could be distrained (distrainable property), where distrained goods had to be kept (the pound), and the debtor's right to replevy. The verb distrain alone signals all of that machinery.

Corpus researchers face a specific trap: the word becomes rarer in American sources after the mid-nineteenth century, not because the remedy disappeared, but because it was increasingly regulated and renamed. Landlord's lien statutes, distraint-for-taxes provisions, and distress-warrant procedures often replaced common law distraining without using the word. Silence in later sources does not mean abolition.

Tax law is a second track where distrain survives longest as active vocabulary. Federal and state revenue statutes authorizing seizure of property for unpaid taxes sometimes continued to use distrain and distraint well into the twentieth century, even as the landlord-tenant remedy was being curtailed. Researchers working on tax enforcement history should search both the common law distress materials and the statutory distraint materials as separate bodies.

The verb form distrain, the noun distress, the agent noun distrainor (the seizing party), and the noun distrainee (the party whose goods are taken) are all live in the historical corpus. The related term distraint — a later nominalization of the verb — appears more frequently in statutory tax contexts than in common law property sources.

Historical Dictionary Support

Black's (both editions) and Bouvier's are in close agreement on the core definition: distraining is the taking of property as a pledge, held until the obligation is performed or the property is replevied. Both editions of Black's acknowledge the historical breadth of the remedy (court appearance, rent, services) while noting that distress is "now generally resorted to" for rent, taxes, and duties — signaling that by the time these editions were compiled, the remedy had already contracted toward those purposes.

Bouvier's adds the French etymology (distraindre, to draw away from) and the Latin districtio, linking the term explicitly to the broader distress entry. Anderson's, characteristically spare, simply redirects to DISTRESS, which correctly reflects that the substantive doctrine lives under the noun form.

What the historical dictionaries collectively underweight is the tension that had already developed between common law distraining and emerging statutory landlord-tenant law. By the late nineteenth century — when these dictionaries were written — courts in many American jurisdictions were already restricting the self-help character of the remedy, and some states had abolished it outright. The dictionary entries present a more stable and uniform picture than the case law actually reflects.

Jurisdictional Note

The landlord's right to distrain for rent was abolished in England by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (replacing it with a commercial rent arrears recovery scheme). In the United States, the common law remedy was eliminated in many states by the mid-twentieth century, though some states retain statutory variants. Distraint for taxes retains independent vitality in federal and state revenue law and should be researched separately from the landlord-tenant remedy.

DISTRAINmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

To take as a pledge prop- erty of another, and keep the same until he performs his obligation or until the property is replevied by the sheriff. It was used to secure an appearance in court, payment of rent, performance of services, etc. 3 Bl. Comm. 231; Fitzh. Nat. Brev. 32, B, C, 223. Distress is now generally resorted to for the purpose of enforcing the payment of rent, taxes, or other duties. DISTRAINER, or He who seizes a distress.

DISTRAINmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

To take as a pledge prop- erty of another, and keep the same until he performs his obligation or until the prop- erty is replevied by the sheriff. It was used to secure an appearance in court, payment of rent, performance of services, etc. 3 Bla. Com. 231; Fitzh. N. В. 32 (B) (C), 223; 3 Daly 455. See DISTRESS. DISTRESS (Fr. distraindre, to draw away from; Lat. districtio). The taking of a personal chattel out of the possession of a wrong-doer into the custody of the party injured, to procure satisfaction for the wrong done. 3 Bla. Com. 6; 44 Barb. 488. It is generally resorted to for the purpose of enforcing the payment of rent, taxes, or other duties, as well as to exact compensa- tion for such damages as result from the trespasses of cattle. This remedy is of great antiquity, and is said by Spelman to have prevailed among the Gothic na- tions of Europe from the breaking up of the Roman Empire. But in a recent work the opinion is ex- pressed that distress before judicial proceedings had been taken is not very old. 1 Poll. & Maitl. Hist. Engl. Law 834. Distress was not a means whereby the distrainor could satisfy the debt due him; ibid. After distress the lord might not sell the goods; they were not in his possession, but were in custodia legis, and he must be ready to give them up if the tenant tendered arrears or offered gage and pledge that he would contest the claim in a court of law. The lord could not take what he liked best among the chattels that he found; 2 id. 574. The English statutes since the days of Magna Charta have, from time to time, extended and modified its features to meet the exigencies of the times. Our state legislatures have generally, and with some al- terations, adopted the English provisions, recogniz- ing the old remedy as a salutary and necessary one, equally conducive to the security of the landlord and to the welfare of society. As a means of col- lecting rent, however, it is becoming unpopular in the United States, as giving an undue advantage to landlords over other creditors in the collection of debts. See 2 Dall. 68; 2 Halst. 29; 1 Harr. & J. 8; 1 M'Cord 299; 1 Blackf. 469; 1 Bibb 607; 2 Leigh 870; 3 Dana 209. In the New England states the law of attachment on mesne process has superseded the law of distress; 3 Pick. 105, 360; 4 Dane, Abr. 126. The state of New York has expressly abolished it by statute. The courts of North Carolina hold it to be inconsistent with the spirit of her laws and government, and de- clare that the common process of distress does not exist in that state; 2 McCord 89; Cam. & N. 22; to the same effect are the laws of Missouri: 38 Mo. 472. In Ohio, Tennessee, and Alabama there are no stat- utory provisions on the subject, except in the for- mer state to secure to the landlord & share of the crops in preference to an execution creditor, and one in the latter, confining the remedy to the city of Mobile; 6 Ala. 239. Mississippi has abolished it by statute; but property cannot be taken in execu- tion on the premises unless a year's rent, if it be due, is first tendered to the landlord, who has also a lien on the growing crop; 50 Miss. 556; to the same effect are the statutes of Wisconsin Wis. Laws, 1866, p. 77. In Colorado a landlord cannot distrain unless in pursuance of an express agreement; 11 Colo. 393. To authorize a distress there must be a fixed rent in money, produce or services; it may be by parol and if not certain it must be capable of being reduced to a cer- tainty; Co. Litt. 96a; 9 Wend. 322; 3 Pa. 31; 1 Bay 815; and hence it will not lie on an agreement to pay no rent, but make re- pairs of uncertain value; Add. Pa. 847; a distress for a rent of a certain quantity of grain, may name the value in case of tender of arrears or sale of the property; 18 S. & R. 52. See 3 W. & S. 531. A distress can only be taken for rent in arrear, and not, therefore, until the day after it is due; unless by the terms of the lease it is made payable in advance; 4 Cow. 516; 3 Munf. 277; 188 Ill. 488. But no pre- vious demand is necessary, except where the conditions of the lease require it; 83 Ga. 402. Nor will the right be extinguished either by an unsatisfied judgment for the rent or by taking a promissory note there- for, unless such note has been accepted in absolute payment of the rent; 5 Hill 651; 3 Pa. 490. It may be taken for any kind of rent, the detention of which beyond the day of pay- ment is injurious to him who is entitled to receive it. At common law, the distrainer must have pos- sessed a reversionary interest in the premises out of which the distress issued, unless he had expressly reserved a power to distrain when he parted with the reversion; 2 Cow. 658; 1 Term 441; Co. Litt. 143 d. But the English statute of 4 Geo. II. c. 28, substantially abolished all distinctions between rents, and gave the remedy in all cases where rent is reserved upon a lease. The effect of the statute was to separate the right of distress from the rever- sion to which

DISTRAINcrossref

Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890

See DISTRESS.

DISTRAINv.

Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913

To press heavily upon; to bear down upon with violence; hence, to constrain or compel; to bind; to distress, torment, or afflict. [Obs.] "Distrained with chains." Chaucer. To rend; to tear. [Obs.] Neither guile nor force might it [a net] distrain. Spenser. To seize, as a pledge or indemnification; to take possession of as security for nonpayment of rent, the reparation of an injury done, etc.; to take by distress; as, to distrain goods for rent, or of an amercement. To subject to distress; to coerce; as, to distrain a person by his goods and chattels.

DISTRAINv.

Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913

To levy a distress. Upon whom I can distrain for debt. Camden.

distrainverb

Wiktionary (English) • 2026

Wiktionary contributors • CC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.

To squeeze, press, embrace; to constrain, oppress. | To force (someone) to do something by seizing their property. | To seize somebody's property in place of, or to force, payment of a debt. | To pull off, tear apart.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In