Definition
A dissolving bond is a type of surety bond given by a party seeking to dissolve, lift, or set aside a legal writ or process — most commonly an attachment or an injunction — that has been issued against them or their property. By posting the bond, the moving party obtains the dissolution of the writ while providing the opposing party with security. The bond is conditioned either to indemnify the opposing party for any loss resulting from the dissolution or to ensure that the bonding party will abide by whatever judgment is ultimately rendered in the underlying proceeding.
In practical terms: a defendant whose property has been seized under a writ of attachment, or against whom an injunction has issued, may not be able or willing to wait for full litigation on the merits while the writ remains in force. The dissolving bond is the mechanism that allows the writ to be set aside immediately, substituting a financial guarantee in place of the process itself. If the bonding party ultimately loses on the merits, the bond stands as security for satisfaction of the judgment.
---
Common Confusion
A dissolving bond is sometimes loosely grouped with release bonds or forthcoming bonds, but the terms are not identical. A forthcoming bond secures the appearance of property at a future time or the delivery of goods upon judgment; it does not necessarily dissolve the underlying writ. A release bond more broadly describes any bond that secures release from a legal hold, including in criminal and immigration contexts. The dissolving bond is specific in purpose: it is the instrument that terminates the writ or process itself, not merely suspends or defers its operation.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers will encounter this term almost exclusively in older American civil procedure materials, equity practice guides, and attachment and injunction treatises from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The dissolving bond occupied a functional role in an era when writs of attachment were common tools for securing property before judgment, and when injunctions were frequently used in commercial and property disputes. As procedural codes modernized — particularly following the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1938 and analogous state procedural reforms — the terminology shifted. Modern practice uses "bond to dissolve attachment," "supersedeas bond," or simply "security" to accomplish similar ends, and the standalone phrase "dissolving bond" appears infrequently in post-mid-twentieth-century materials.
Key research traps:
1. **Terminology drift.** Searching for "dissolving bond" in modern court filings and procedural rules will yield sparse results. Researchers should run parallel searches for "release of attachment," "bond to dissolve," "discharge of attachment," and "injunction bond" to capture the full doctrinal landscape across time periods.
2. **Equity versus law court distinctions.** In historical sources, the dissolving bond appears differently depending on whether the underlying process arose from a court of law (attachment) or a court of equity (injunction). The conditions of the bond and the procedural mechanics for calling on it could differ accordingly. Researchers using pre-merger procedural materials should be attentive to which court system generated the bond requirement.
3. **Condition of the bond matters.** Black's identifies two alternative conditions: indemnify the opposing party, or abide the judgment. These are not the same obligation. A bond conditioned to indemnify covers actual losses flowing from the dissolution; a bond conditioned to abide the judgment is essentially an undertaking to satisfy any final judgment rendered. Older cases may turn on which condition was actually written into the bond instrument.
4. **State-by-state procedural variation.** The rules governing when a dissolving bond could be demanded, in what amount, and on what terms were largely creatures of state statute and local equity practice. There was no uniform federal rule governing attachment bonds until well into the twentieth century. Jurisdiction-specific procedural codes and equity rules are essential primary sources.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) provides the core definition and correctly identifies the two primary conditions on which a dissolving bond may run: indemnification of the opposite party, or compliance with the judgment. The definition is concise and functional, accurately capturing the term's primary procedural role.
What Black's does not address is the relationship between the dissolving bond and the underlying doctrine governing when dissolution would be granted — that is, the substantive showing a party had to make before a court would accept the bond and lift the writ. The bond was the instrument of dissolution, but its posting was typically not automatic; courts retained discretion in many jurisdictions over whether to allow dissolution at all, particularly for injunctions protecting rights that money could not adequately compensate.
Historical sources generally agree on the basic mechanics but differ in their treatment of injunction bonds versus attachment bonds. Some treatises of the period treat the "injunction bond" as a distinct instrument with its own doctrine, separate from the attachment-dissolution context. Researchers should not assume that rules governing one type transfer automatically to the other.
The cited case, Sanger v. Hibbard, 2 Ind. T. 547, 53 S.W. 330, arises from the Indian Territory courts in 1900 and reflects the term's use in an attachment context in that jurisdiction and era.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The dissolving bond was governed by state procedural statutes and local equity rules, with significant variation in conditions, amounts, and enforcement mechanisms. Modern researchers working with a specific jurisdiction should consult that state's historical code provisions on attachment and injunction practice alongside the general treatise literature.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia: contracts_168 — Suretyship: Performance Bonds and Payment Bonds (Construction Context) [for general surety bond mechanics and bond condition doctrine]
The Law Mind Insurance Law Encyclopedia: insurance_69 — Surety Bonds: Performance, Payment, and Bid Bonds [for surety obligation framework applicable to bond conditions]
---