Definition
In Law French, *disliee* means "not bound" or "under no legal obligation." The term appears in medieval English legal texts as an adjective describing a person who is free from a particular tie, duty, or legal constraint — not bound by oath, bond, covenant, or status that would otherwise compel performance or submission.
The term belongs to the technical vocabulary of Law French, the specialized legal dialect used in English courts from the Norman Conquest through the early modern period. It surfaces in archaic pleading, statutory commentary, and legal glossaries rather than in contemporary practice.
---
Why It Matters in Research
DISLIEE is the kind of term a researcher encounters only in transcriptions of medieval statutes, early Year Books, or the secondary glossaries that attempted to make those sources legible — Kelham's *Glossary of Norman French* being the primary bridge source. It does not appear in modern case law or statutes.
Researchers working in pre-modern English legal history should note that Law French terms of this class — describing personal legal status as bound or unbound — often appear without translation in original sources, creating interpretive gaps when the surrounding context is ambiguous. The distinction between being *liee* (bound, as by surety, marriage, or feudal obligation) and *disliee* (released from that bond) could have substantive legal consequences in the source document, determining whether a party owed a duty, could be distrained, or was competent to act independently.
The term is not in active use and will not appear in post-seventeenth century legal materials. If encountered in a research source, it signals either a direct quotation from a medieval text or a secondary source engaging closely with such texts.
Note also the proximity in Burrill to *dismari* (unmarried), which Burrill records on the same entry line. This adjacency in the dictionary is coincidental — alphabetical rather than conceptual — but reflects the broader Law French vocabulary of personal legal status (bound/unbound, married/unmarried) that was essential to medieval determinations of legal capacity.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary is the sole historical shelf source to record this term. Burrill cites Kelham as his authority, indicating that the primary route to the term runs through Robert Kelham's *Glossary of Norman French* (1779), which itself derives from glosses of medieval statutes and Year Books.
Burrill provides no illustrative context beyond the bare definition "not bound; under no obligation," which limits what can be said about the term's range of application from the dictionary record alone. No competing definition exists in the historical dictionary corpus to test against.
What the historical dictionaries miss: none of the common early modern English legal dictionaries — Cowell, Blount, or Jacob — appear to have independently glossed this term, suggesting it was already archaic or specialized enough by the seventeenth century to escape notice outside dedicated Norman French glossaries.
---
Jurisdictional Note
This term is specific to the historical legal tradition of England and carries no independent meaning in contemporary common law jurisdictions. Researchers working in Scottish, Irish, or colonial American sources are unlikely to encounter it except in texts directly derivative of English medieval practice.
---