DEED OF COVENANT

3 definitions found across Law Mind sources

DEED OF COVENANTAuthored
The Law Mind • 1034 words
Definition
A deed of covenant is a formal instrument, executed as a deed, by which one party enters into a binding promise or set of promises to another, where those covenants are embodied in a standalone document rather than embedded within a broader conveyance, mortgage, or other transaction instrument. The deed of covenant is the vehicle; the covenants it carries are its content. Three principal uses account for most instances in the corpus: 1. Covenants for title. A separate deed of covenant may accompany a conveyance to supply or supplement title assurances — promises by the grantor that title is good, that the grantor has the right to convey, that the property is free from encumbrances, and that the grantee will enjoy quiet possession. Where the conveyance itself is silent or deficient on title covenants, a deed of covenant fills the gap. 2. Indemnity covenants. A purchaser or mortgagee may require the seller or borrower to enter into a separate deed of covenant as security against future claims — for example, where a property is subject to restrictive covenants and the incoming party seeks a contractual indemnity from the outgoing party against liability for breach. 3. Production of title deeds. Where original title deeds are retained by a third party (common in English practice where a single set of documents covered multiple parcels), the person holding the deeds might enter a deed of covenant obligating them to produce those documents when required. A covenant with a penalty for non-payment of money was historically used as an alternative to a bond with a condition, though courts treated the remedies as equivalent regardless of the instrument chosen.
Common Confusion
DEED OF COVENANT vs. COVENANT IN A DEED. A covenant in a deed is a promise embedded in a conveyance, mortgage, lease, or other instrument that serves a primary transactional purpose. A deed of covenant is a standalone instrument whose sole or primary purpose is the covenant itself. The distinction matters for research because running-with-the-land analysis, privity of contract questions, and enforcement mechanisms may be addressed under different doctrinal headings depending on whether the covenant was freestanding or incidental to a larger transaction. Historical sources do not always flag this distinction cleanly. DEED OF COVENANT vs. DEED OF SETTLEMENT. Rapalje & Lawrence immediately follows the deed of covenant entry with a definition of deed of settlement, referencing English joint stock companies. These are entirely distinct instruments. The adjacency in older dictionaries creates indexing confusion in the corpus — researchers browsing or keyword-searching should not conflate them.
Why It Matters in Research
The deed of covenant as a standalone instrument is predominantly a creature of English and Commonwealth practice. In American sources, the same function is typically performed by covenants written directly into the conveyance deed, making the phrase "deed of covenant" appear far more often in English law materials and in American discussions of English property practice than in domestic American transactional documents. Corpus researchers searching American real estate records for this specific phrase will find sparser results than they expect. Historical sources in the corpus are more likely to discuss the covenants themselves — covenants for title, covenants of warranty, covenants against encumbrances — as independent doctrinal entries rather than as components of a deed of covenant instrument. Research on covenant content should therefore move quickly from this entry to the substantive covenant entries. The encyclopedia links below are the natural next step. The indemnity covenant variant remains active and important in modern English conveyancing practice, particularly where land subject to restrictive covenants changes hands and the seller's solicitor takes a deed of covenant indemnifying the seller against future breach liability. Researchers encountering this usage in modern English materials should note that the instrument does real transactional work and is not merely archaic form. The penalty covenant for debt — used historically in place of a bond with a condition — is primarily of historical interest in the corpus. Courts equalized the remedies between bond and penalty covenant long before the modern period, so the instrument type carries less independent significance than it once did.
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary and Rapalje & Lawrence carry essentially identical text on this entry, verbatim in substance if not in every word. Both identify the same three use cases (title covenants, indemnity of purchaser or mortgagee, production of title deeds) and the same observation about penalty covenants as bond substitutes. Neither source attributes the equivalence of remedies to specific authority, but the proposition was settled doctrine well before either dictionary's publication. Both sources are descriptive rather than analytical. Neither addresses the running-of-covenant question — whether obligations in a deed of covenant bind successors in title — which is the issue most likely to drive modern research touching this instrument. That gap is significant: a researcher relying solely on these dictionary entries will miss the question that matters most in a real estate or property dispute context. Neither dictionary distinguishes between the deed of covenant as an English practice and its comparatively limited American footprint. Researchers should treat both entries as reflecting primarily English real property tradition.
Jurisdictional Note
The deed of covenant as a named instrument is far more common in English and Commonwealth jurisdictions than in the United States. American practice integrates covenants for title directly into the conveyance deed, and American dictionaries and treatises tend to discuss the covenants themselves rather than the standalone instrument. Canadian and Australian corpus materials will reflect hybrid usage depending on era and jurisdiction.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Real Estate Transactions & Construction Encyclopedia: — realestate_21: Deed Covenants of Title — Present Covenants (Seisin, Right to Convey, Against Encumbrances) and Future Covenants (Warranty, Quiet Enjoyment, Further Assurances) — realestate_22: Breach of Deed Covenants — Damages, Statute of Limitations, and Remote Grantee Claims The Law Mind Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia: — contracts_70: Discharge — Release and Covenant Not to Sue
Related Terms
Covenant for title Covenant of warranty Covenant of quiet enjoyment Covenant of seisin Covenant against encumbrances Covenant of further assurances Restrictive covenant Indemnity covenant Running covenant Deed of settlement Bond with condition Privity of contract Privity of estate
DEED OF COVENANTmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
Covenants are sometimes entered into by a separate deed, for title, or for the indemnity of a purchaser or mortgagee, or for the production of title-deeds. A covenant with a penalty is sometimes taken for the payment of a debt, instead of a bond with a condition, but the legal remedy is the same in either case.
DEED OF COVENANTmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888
- Covenants are sometimes entered into by a separate deed, for title, or for the indemnity of a purchaser or mortgagee, or for the production of title deeds. A covenant with a penalty is sometimes taken for the payment of a a debt, de instead of a bond with a condition, but the legal remedy is the same in either case. DEED OF SETTLEMENT.-In England a joint stock company formed before November 1st, 1844, was usually formed by a deed of settlement, constituting certain persons trustees of the partnership property, and containing regulations for the management of its affairs. It was sometimes accompanied by a private act of parliament or by letters-patent. (Sm. Merc. L. 62. See COMPANY.) Companies registered after November 1st, 1844, under the 7 and 8 Vict. c. 110, and before 1862, were regulated by deeds of settlement (Id. 67), in the same way as companies formed under the Act of 1862 are regulated by a memorandum and articles of association (q. v.) DEED OF THE PREMISES, (in an agreement). 13 Johns. (N. Υ.) 359, 363. DEED, GOOD AND SUFFICIENT, (in an agreement). 6 Halst. (N. J.) 110; 2 Johns. (N. Y.) 595.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In