DE MERCATORIBUS

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

DE MERCATORIBUSAuthored
The Law Mind • 853 words
Definition
De mercatoribus (Latin: "concerning merchants" or "of merchants") refers to a body of English medieval commercial legislation enacted under Edward I, principally comprising two statutes. The first, passed in the eleventh year of Edward I's reign (1283), is more commonly known as the Statute of Acton Burnel. The second was passed in the thirteenth year of the same reign (1285), sometimes called the Statute of Merchants. Together, these statutes created and refined the mechanism of the statute merchant — a formal recognizance or acknowledgment of debt before designated royal officials, which, upon default, gave the creditor extraordinary remedies against the debtor's lands, goods, and body. Under the second statute in particular, all lands of a debtor whose debt arose from trade could be delivered to the creditor to hold in pledge until the debt was satisfied. The statutes were a direct response to the demands of the merchant class, particularly foreign traders operating in England, who required faster and more reliable debt enforcement than ordinary common law processes afforded. The existing common law courts were slow and offered limited remedies against land. De mercatoribus bypassed those limitations by creating a summary administrative process outside ordinary court proceedings.
Common Confusion
The two statutes grouped under the name de mercatoribus are frequently conflated. The Statute of Acton Burnel (1283) established the initial framework for the statute merchant recognizance. The second statute (1285) expanded its scope, most significantly extending the creditor's remedy to the debtor's lands — a power not fully secured by the earlier act. Historical dictionary sources sometimes reference only the first statute, omitting this expansion. Researchers should distinguish between the two when the precise scope of the remedy is at issue. De mercatoribus should also be distinguished from the later Statute of Staples (1353), which established a related but separate mechanism — the statute staple — applying to debts acknowledged before the mayor of a staple town. The practical remedies were similar, but the procedural context and the officials involved differed.
Why It Matters in Research
For researchers working in legal history, commercial law, or the history of creditor remedies, de mercatoribus marks a pivotal moment: the formal introduction of land as security for commercial debt in English law, predating modern mortgage and judgment lien concepts by centuries. The statute merchant recognizance it authorized was a precursor to modern judgment enforcement mechanisms. When working with historical English legal sources — Year Books, plea rolls, or early chancery records — researchers will encounter the statute merchant as a live procedural device. Understanding that it originates in de mercatoribus is essential for tracing the chain of authority. Blackstone's Commentaries (2 Bl. Comm. 161) and Reeve's History of the English Law (2 Reeve, Eng. Law, 160–162) both discuss these statutes and are the standard secondary reference points cited in the historical dictionaries. A trap for researchers: the Latin phrase de mercatoribus functions in historical sources both as a proper name (the title of the statutes) and as a descriptive phrase ("of" or "concerning merchants") appearing in other legal contexts. Do not assume every instance of the phrase in a historical document refers to these specific statutes. The statutes are also relevant to the history of imprisonment for debt. De mercatoribus provided for arrest and imprisonment of the defaulting debtor's body as one enforcement option — a thread that runs forward through centuries of English debtor-creditor law into the eventual abolition of imprisonment for debt in the nineteenth century.
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries are consistent on the core identification: de mercatoribus names the Edwardian commercial statutes, the first of which is the Statute of Acton Burnel. Black's (1st and 2nd editions) and Burrill's Law Dictionary all agree on this point. Burrill provides the most substantive entry, noting that there were two statutes rather than one — a detail Black's largely omits — and describing the operative land-pledge remedy with more precision. This makes Burrill the more reliable source when the distinction between the two statutes matters. Black's entries, while accurate, fold the topic into a brief identification note and move on. None of the historical dictionary entries capture the full procedural apparatus of the statute merchant: the role of the enrolling officer, the certificate of recognizance, the writ of extent issuing on default, or the sheriff's role in delivering the debtor's property. For that level of detail, Reeve and Blackstone remain the primary references, as the dictionaries themselves signal.
Jurisdictional Note
De mercatoribus was English legislation with no direct counterpart in American law. The statute merchant as a device was not transplanted to American jurisdictions. American creditor remedy law developed along separate statutory lines. The term appears in American legal dictionaries primarily as a historical reference, not as operative law.
Related Terms
Statute Merchant — Acton Burnel — Statute of Staples — Statute Staple — Recognizance — Extent — Judgment Lien — Debtor and Creditor — Imprisonment for Debt — Writ of Extent — Pledge — Statute of Merchants
DE MERCATORIBUSmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
merchants." The name of a statute passed in the eleventh year of Edw. I., (1233,) more commonly called the "Statute of Acton Bur- nel," authorizing the recognizance by statute merchant. See 2 Reeve, Eng. Law, 160- 162; 2 Bl. Comm. 161. De minimis non curat lex. The law does not care for, or take notice of, very small or trifling matters. The law does not con- cern itself about trifles. Cro. Eliz. 353. Thus, error in calculation of a fractional part of a penny will not be regarded. Hob. 88. So, the law will not, in general, notice the fraction of a day. Broom, Max. 142. 3 Steph. Comm. 130. De molendino de novo erecto non jacet prohibitio. Cro. Jac. 429. A prohibition lies not against a newly-erected mill. De morte hominis nulla est cunctatio longa. Where the death of a human being is concerned, [in a matter of life and death,] G no delay is [considered] long. Co. Litt. 134. H
DE MERCATORIBUSmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1867
Lat. Of merchants. There were two English statutes passed under this title; the first, in the eleventh year of Edward I. otherwise called the statute of Acton Burnel, (q. v.); the second in the thirteenth year of the same reign. By this statute, all the lands of a debtor, where the debt was contracted in trade, might be delivered to the creditor to hold in pledge until the debt was levied, when the land was to be restored. Stat. de Merc. 13 Edw. I. st. 3. 2 Bl. Com. 161. The recognizance introduced by this statute was called a statute-merchant. Id. 160. 2 Reeves' Hist. 160-162. See Barringt. Obs. Stat. 116-119.
DE MERCATORIBUSmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
“Concerning merchants.” The name of a statute passed in the eleventh year of Bdw. I. (1233,) more commonly called the “Statute of Acton Burnel,” authorizing the recognizance by statute merchant. See 2 Reeve, Eng. Law, 160-162 ;. 2 Bl. Comm. 161. De minimis non curat lez. The law does not care for, or take notice of, very small or trifling matters. The law does not concern itself about trifies. Cro. Eliz. 353. Thus, error in calculation of a fractional part of a penny will not be regarded. Hob. 88. So, the law will not, in general, notice the fraction of a day. Broom, Max. 142.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In