Definition
De coronatore eligendo (Latin: "for electing a coroner") is a historical English writ directed to the sheriff, commanding him to convene the county court for the purpose of electing a coroner. Upon receipt of the writ, the sheriff was required to assemble the full county court, where the freeholders of the county served as electors and chose among themselves a person to fill the office of coroner. The writ was a mechanism of medieval English local governance, ensuring that the coroner's office — a position of significant legal and administrative importance — was filled through a formal, supervised electoral process rather than by executive appointment alone.
---
Common Language
The individual words present no gap requiring separate treatment; "coroner" and "electing" carry their ordinary meanings. The legal significance lies entirely in the procedural and constitutional framework the writ represents, not in any divergence between common and technical usage. Section omitted.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term belongs to the narrow but important family of English prerogative and administrative writs that governed the constitution and conduct of local offices. Researchers encounter it primarily in two contexts: historical studies of the English coroner's office and surveys of obsolete writ practice.
Several research traps are worth flagging. First, the writ is strictly English in origin and application; it has no meaningful American common-law counterpart, because colonial and early American jurisdictions either appointed coroners by executive authority or provided for election by statute, not by writ to the sheriff. A researcher applying this writ's logic to American sources will find no traction.
Second, the term sits within a cluster of Latin writs governing local office — including de coronatore exonerando (for removing a coroner) — and confusion between them is possible in older indexes and digests that abbreviate Latin phrases. Confirm the specific writ before drawing procedural conclusions.
Third, the electoral mechanism described — freeholders assembling in full county court — reflects a constitutional structure that had largely become archaic even within England by the nineteenth century. Parliamentary reform and the reorganization of local government progressively displaced this model. Sources written after the mid-nineteenth century may describe the writ as obsolete or reference it only in the historical past tense.
Fourth, the citation in both Black's editions to "Sewell, Sheriffs, 372" points to a treatise on the office of sheriff. Researchers tracing the procedural details of the writ should locate that source directly rather than relying solely on Black's compressed summary.
For corpus researchers, this term will appear most frequently in: digests of English writ practice; treatises on the office of coroner or sheriff; and historical legal encyclopedias treating county court procedure. It is unlikely to appear in American case law except as a historical reference in a broader discussion of the coroner's office.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both Black's Law Dictionary (1st and 2nd editions) carry identical entries, word for word, which suggests the compilers treated the term as settled and uncontroversial — a minor technical writ with a fixed description. Neither edition elaborates on the conditions that would occasion issuance of the writ (for instance, a vacancy in the coroner's office, a contested election, or a sheriff's failure to act), leaving the procedural trigger underdeveloped.
Both editions cite Sewell's treatise on sheriffs as the sole authority, which places the writ squarely in the literature of sheriff's duties rather than coroner's law per se. This framing is instructive: the writ was as much a command to the sheriff about his administrative obligations as it was a vehicle for popular election.
What the historical dictionaries miss: neither edition situates the writ in the timeline of English legal history or notes that the electoral role of freeholders in county court was an institution of considerable antiquity by the time these dictionaries were written, and one that was being superseded. The absence of any note on obsolescence is itself a data point — Black's, in both editions, compiled the term descriptively without flagging its diminished practical utility.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The writ is exclusively English in origin and has no operative counterpart in American law. Coroner selection in U.S. jurisdictions is governed by state statute, providing variously for popular election, gubernatorial appointment, or consolidation of the function into other offices such as the medical examiner. Researchers should not import this writ's procedural logic into any American jurisdictional analysis.
---