Definition
De appellationibus (Latin: "concerning appeals") is a term from Roman and civil law referring to the body of law, procedure, and doctrinal rules governing appeals. It appears most prominently as a title heading in the Digest of Justinian (Dig. 49.1), where it organizes the texts of Roman jurists dealing with the right to appeal, the proper form of appeals, and the effects of lodging an appeal on the underlying judgment. In the context of English legal history, the phrase appears as a descriptor for writs or proceedings touching the appeal process, and occasionally as a shorthand reference to the relevant titles of the civil law corpus that English ecclesiastical and admiralty practitioners drew upon.
The term is not a cause of action or a specific writ in the common law tradition. It functions instead as a doctrinal heading — a label organizing legal materials about appellate procedure within the civilian tradition.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering de appellationibus in historical sources should treat it primarily as a civilian citation marker pointing toward Digest 49.1, rather than as a named writ or independent procedural device. The phrase appears in early English ecclesiastical court practice and admiralty proceedings, where Roman civil law procedure governed, and its appearance in a source signals that the writer is drawing on civilian rather than common law authority for the relevant appellate rules.
The Burrill entry for this term is notably compressed and partially corrupted in transcription — the phrase "Breve. L. Lat. Writ for taappeals" (an apparent typographical artifact for "Writ for appeals") and the preceding reference to "NAMIUM" suggest a cross-reference structure that was imperfectly typeset. Researchers should not read the Burrill entry as definitively associating de appellationibus with any specific English writ of appeals; the entry's primary value is its pointer to Dig. 49.1.
When tracing appellate doctrine in equity, admiralty, or ecclesiastical contexts prior to the 19th century, de appellationibus serves as a useful search anchor. Historical treatises and commentaries on civilian procedure will often cite Dig. 49.1 when discussing who may appeal, within what time, and with what suspensive effect on judgment enforcement — questions that were not uniformly settled in early English practice and where civilian learning was directly imported.
Researchers should also be aware that the common law tradition developed its own parallel vocabulary for appeals (writ of error, bill of exceptions, certiorari) largely without reference to this civilian title. Crossing between these two streams in the historical corpus requires attention to which court and which procedural tradition is operative.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary gives de appellationibus only a skeletal entry, defining it as a Latin phrase meaning "about appeals" and citing Digest 49.1. The entry sits adjacent to cross-references for other Digest titles organized by subject matter (notably de arboribus caedendis, concerning the cutting of trees, at Dig. 43.27), which reflects Burrill's broader organizational method of cataloguing Roman law titles as reference anchors for practitioners needing to locate civilian authority. The compression of the entry accurately reflects the term's status: it is not a term of art requiring extended doctrinal analysis, but a label identifying a body of source material.
No significant divergence exists across the major historical dictionaries on this term because the phrase is sufficiently technical that most common law dictionaries either omit it or treat it as Burrill does — as a pointer to the Digest. Jacob's Law Dictionary and Tomlin's Law Dictionary do not carry the term in their principal editions. This absence is itself informative: it confirms that de appellationibus had no independent foothold as a term of art in the common law courts, remaining confined to the civilian and ecclesiastical practitioner's vocabulary.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term is most relevant to research touching English ecclesiastical courts, the High Court of Admiralty, and early American admiralty practice, all of which operated under civilian procedure. It has no operative meaning in modern U.S. or English common law courts.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia: Standards of Review on Appeal (De Novo, Abuse of Discretion, Plain Error) — for the modern appellate framework that developed independently of the civilian tradition referenced by this term.
---