called, because compensation is made to the owner for the injury to, or deprivation of, his easements of light, air, and access, and these are parts of the fee. Dode v. Railway Co., 70 Hun, 374, 24 N. Y. Supp. 422; People v. Barker, 165 N. Y. 305, 59 N. BE. 151.—Inadequate amages. Damages are called “inadequate,” within the rule that an injunction will not be pane where adequate damages at law could recovered for the injury sought to be prevented, when such a recovery at law would not compensate the parties and place them in the position in which they formerly stood. Insurance Co. v. Bonner, 7 Colo. App. 97, 42 Pac, 681.—Imaginary damages. his term is sometimes u as equivalent to “exemplary,” “vindictive,” or “punitive” damages. Murphy v. Hobbs, 7 Colo. 541, 5 Pac. 119, 49 Am. Rep. 366.—Intervening damages. Such damages to an appellee as result from the delay caused by the appeal. McGregor vy. Balch, 17 Vt. 568; easely v. Buckminster, -1 Tvler (Vt.) 267; Roberts v. Warner, 17 Vt. 46, 42 Am. Dec. 478. —Land ages. A term sometimes applied to the amount of compensation to be paid for land taken under the power of eminent domain or for injury to, or depreciation of, land adjoining that taken. People v. Hilts, 27 Mise. Rep. 290, 58 N. Y. Supp. 434; In re Lent, 47 App. Div. 349, 62 N. Y. Supp. 227.—Necessary damages. <A term said to be of much wider scope in the law of damages than “pecuniary.” It embraces all those consequences of an injury usually denominated “general’? damages, as distinguished from special damages; whereas the phrase “pecuniary damages” covers a smaller class of damages within the larger class of “general” damages. Browning v. Wabash Western R. Co. (Mo.) 24 8. W. 746.—Pecuniary damages. Such as can be estimated in and compensated by money; not merely the loss of money or salable property or rights, but all such loss, deprivation, or injury as can be made the subject of calculation and of recompense in money. Walker v. McNeill, 17 Wash. 582, 50 Pac. 518: Searle v. Railroad Co., 32 W. Va. 370. 9 S. E. 248; McIntyre v. Railroad Co., 37 N. Y. 295; Davidson Benedict Co. v. Severson, 100 Tenn. 572, 72 S. W. 967.—Presumptive damages. <A term occasicnully used as the equivalent of “exemplary” or “punitive’ damages. Murphy v. Hobbs, 7 Cobo. 41, 5 Pac. 119, 49 Am. Rep. 36.—Prospective damages. Damages which are expected to follow from the act or state of facts made the basis of a plaintiff's suit; damages which have not yet accrued, at the time of the trial, but which, in the nature of things, must necessarily, or most areas result from the acts or facts complained of.—Speculative dam-~ ages. Prospective or anticipated damages from the same acts or facts constituting the present cause of action, but which depend upon future developments which are contingent, conjectural. or improbable—Damages ultra. Additional damages claimed by a_ plaintiff not satisfied with those paid into court by the defendant.