CROWN PAPER

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

CROWN PAPERAuthored
The Law Mind • 810 words
Definition
A crown paper is a court document listing criminal cases awaiting hearing or decision before a superior English court, most commonly the Court of Queen's Bench (or King's Bench, depending on the reigning monarch). The paper functions as a docket or calendar of criminal matters pending before the court, organizing the court's criminal business for scheduling and disposition purposes. Cases appearing on the crown paper historically included: 1. Criminal informations filed by the Attorney General or other authorized parties; 2. Quo warranto informations challenging the exercise of public office or franchise; 3. Criminal cases removed from inferior courts to the superior court by writ of certiorari; and 4. Cases transmitted from sessions courts for review or decision at the higher level. The term derives from the Crown's role as nominal prosecutor in English criminal proceedings — criminal matters are understood as actions brought in the name of the sovereign, hence "crown" business, and the paper recording them takes that designation. ---
Common Confusion
CROWN PAPER is distinct from the nisi prius paper or the plea side of a court's docket, which concerned civil matters. Researchers encountering historical English court records should not conflate crown paper entries with civil cause lists or equity side documents. The crown paper was specifically and exclusively a criminal docket. Additionally, the title shifts between "crown paper" and "queen's paper" or "king's paper" in some period sources, reflecting the reigning sovereign at the time of record creation rather than any substantive difference in meaning or function. ---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is almost entirely a term of English legal history and will appear in sources dealing with the Court of Queen's Bench or King's Bench prior to the Judicature Acts of 1873–1875, which restructured the English superior courts and rationalized their procedural terminology. Researchers working in: - Pre-Judicature Act English criminal procedure - Quo warranto proceedings - Certiorari practice in 18th- and 19th-century England - Historical English court records and term papers will encounter this term in its original procedural context. After the Judicature Acts consolidated the superior courts into the Supreme Court of Judicature, the distinct administrative language of "crown paper" as a formal scheduling instrument faded from active use. Modern English criminal practice uses different docketing terminology. The term does not carry over into American legal practice in any meaningful way — U.S. courts never adopted the crown paper system, and the concept of the Crown as prosecutor is entirely absent from American criminal procedure. A key research trap: because the crown paper aggregated several procedurally distinct types of matters (quo warranto, certiorari removals, informations, sessions cases), a case described as appearing "on the crown paper" does not itself tell you the nature of the proceeding. The researcher must look to the specific entry or cause to determine what type of criminal matter it was. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary provides the core definition, citing Brown (presumably Brown's Legal Dictionary), and correctly identifies the crown paper's scope: it lists criminal matters before the Queen's Bench and encompasses informations quo warranto, criminal informations, certiorari removals from inferior courts, and cases from the sessions. This is a reliable and complete characterization for the term's primary use period. Black's entry is brief, appropriate to the term's relatively narrow procedural function. No substantive divergence among historical sources is noted — this is a term with a stable, specific meaning that did not evolve significantly in contested directions. The limitation of historical dictionary treatment is that it does not situate the term within the broader structural history of the Queen's Bench or explain its disappearance following court reorganization, which is the most practically useful context for a modern researcher. ---
Jurisdictional Note
The crown paper is an exclusively English procedural artifact, associated with the Court of Queen's Bench (or King's Bench). It has no direct equivalent in Scottish, Irish, or American practice. Researchers working with Commonwealth legal history outside England should not assume the term carried the same administrative meaning in colonial or dominion court systems without independent verification. ---
Related Terms
Certiorari — writ used to remove cases from inferior courts to superior courta primary source of crown paper entries Quo warranto — information challenging exercise of public office; regularly appeared on the crown paper Criminal information — prosecution by information rather than indictment; a crown paper staple Court of Queen's Bench / King's Bench — the superior court most closely associated with the crown paper Nisi prius paper — civil side counterpart; the crown paper's procedural parallel for non-criminal matters Docket — modern functional equivalent in American practice Sessions — source court from which cases were transmitted to appear on the crown paper Judicature Acts (1873–1875) — reorganization that rendered the term historically bounded
CROWN PAPERmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
A paper containing the list of criminal cases which await the hearing or decision of the court, and partic- ularly of the court of queen's bench; and it then includes all cases arising from informa. tions quo warranto, criminal informations, criminal cases brought up from inferior courts by writ of certiorari, and cases from the sessions. Brown.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In