same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life and limb; nor be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right of a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. No ex post facto law shall be passed-by Congress or by any State. The foregoing principles restrict the power of the United States government, and do not affect State legislation. But the same principles, expressed in identically or substantially the same language, are also found in the constitutions of the States, as part of the rights which are declared to be excepted out of the general powers of government, and not delegated to the law-enacting department. See in detail the names of particular crimes; also ACCESSARY; ACCIDENT; AID, 2; ATTEMPT; BAIL, 2; CAUSE, 2; CHARACTER; Сомміт, 3; COMPACT, Social; COMPOUND, 4; CONFESSION, 2; CONFRONT; CONVICT; COSTS; DAMAGES; DECEIT, 2; DECOY; DEGREE, 2; DELIBERATION, 3; DRUNKENNESS; DUEL; DOUBT, Reasonable; EQUITY; EVIDENCE; EXTRADITION; FACTUM, Ех post; FELONY; FINE, 2; FORFEITURE; GUILTY; IGNORANCE; INDICTMENT; INFAMY; INNOCENT, 2; INSANITY, 2 (6); INTENT; JEOPARDY; JURY, Trial; MERGER, 3; OBSCENE; PARDON; POLICE, 2, 3; PREMEDITATE; PRESENT, 1; PROCESS, 1; PUNISH; RATIFICATION; REVOLT; REWARD, 1; SENTENCE; WAIVER; WILL, 1; WITNESS; L. A crime, a fault; literally, a judicial decision, or that which is subjected to a judicial decision; an accusation of wrong. 11 Greenl. Ev. § 451. 2 Emery's Case, 107 Mass. 180 (1871); United States v. Prescott, 2 Dill. 405 (1872); 1 Den. Cr. Cas. 236. See United States v. M'Carthy, 18 F. R. 87 (1883); Youngs v. Youngs, 5 Redf. 505, 509-11 (1882), cases; Exp. Reynolds, 20 Ch. D. 294 (1882); 1 Whart. Ev. §§ 533-40; 2 Crim. Law Mag. 313. That court to decide, see also Exp. Stice, 70 Cal. 53 (1886). • Spies et al. v. People, 122 111. 235 (1887); Whart. Cr. Εν. § 432. State v. Pfefferle, 36 Kan. 92-96 (1886), cases: 35 Alb. Law J. 63. United States v. Mullaney, 32 F. R. 370 (1887), Brewer, J. * Morrison v. Morrison, 142 Mass. 362 (1886), cases; Handy v. Handy, 124 id. 395 (1878), cases.