Definition
An archaic Latin term appearing in early English legal sources meaning a crop — that is, the produce of cultivated land. The term is functionally synonymous with croppa and refers to the agricultural yield standing on or harvested from land. It appears in medieval legal texts in contexts addressing rights to crops as between landlords and tenants, or in relation to the rights of outgoing occupants of land.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers will encounter crappa almost exclusively in pre-modern English legal sources — primarily treatises from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. The term carries no independent legal doctrine of its own; it is a Latin shorthand for the subject matter of rules that were more fully developed under the doctrine of emblements (the right of a tenant to harvest crops planted before a tenancy unexpectedly terminated). When reading Fleta or similar medieval compilations, recognizing crappa as equivalent to croppa and to the vernacular "crop" prevents misreading of passages about rights in land produce.
The key research trap is treating crappa and croppa as potentially distinct legal concepts. They are not. The variation is scribal and orthographic, not doctrinal. Burrill cross-references the two forms directly, and researchers should treat any passage using either term as invoking the same body of law.
Because the term appears nowhere in modern legal usage, it will surface only in historical corpus materials — Year Books, Fleta, and similar compilations. Any modern treatise or case using the word would almost certainly be quoting or glossing a historical source. Searching the Law Mind corpus for both spellings (crappa and croppa) is advisable when tracing early property law concerning agricultural land.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary provides the only significant treatment in the standard shelf sources. The entry is spare: it identifies the term as Latin, assigns it to old English law, glosses it as "a crop," cites Fleta lib. 2, c. 82, § 2, and directs the reader to croppa. No further doctrinal development is offered.
This brevity is itself informative. The historical dictionaries do not record crappa as generating distinct legal rules; the term is purely descriptive. The substantive law governing rights to crops — the doctrine of emblements, questions of fixtures, and tenant rights upon termination of an estate — is developed elsewhere in those dictionaries under emblements, away-going crops, and related headings. Researchers who need the doctrine rather than just the vocabulary should move quickly to those entries.
No divergence among historical sources is noted; the term is stable and limited in its recorded usage.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term belongs exclusively to the medieval English legal tradition and has no recognized usage in American, Scottish, or other common law jurisdictions except as a historical artifact. Any jurisdictional analysis of the underlying subject matter (rights in crops) requires consulting the doctrine of emblements, which did develop separately across jurisdictions.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Law Mind Encyclopedia: EMBLEMENTS; CROPS AND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE; FLETA (Historical Sources)
---