Definition
The courts of England (and Wales) are the judicial institutions through which English law is administered. Because the English court system has undergone profound structural reorganization over centuries — most dramatically through the Judicature Acts of 1873 and 1875 and again through the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 — the term "courts of England" does not refer to a static set of institutions. Its meaning depends entirely on the period being researched.
At any given moment in legal history, the phrase encompasses:
1. CIVIL COURTS: Institutions exercising jurisdiction over private disputes, property, equity, probate, admiralty, and matrimonial causes. Before 1875, these were separate and parallel courts — Chancery, King's/Queen's Bench, Common Pleas, Exchequer, Probate, Divorce, and Admiralty — each with distinct procedures and jurisdictions. After the Judicature Acts, these were fused into a unified Supreme Court of Judicature comprising the High Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal.
2. CRIMINAL COURTS: Institutions exercising jurisdiction over criminal offenses. The primary criminal courts, as consolidated in the modern period, are: (1) Magistrates' Courts (formerly Petty Sessions), handling summary offenses and preliminary hearings; (2) the Crown Court (formerly Assizes and Quarter Sessions), handling indictable offenses tried before a judge and jury; (3) the Central Criminal Court (the "Old Bailey"), a division of the Crown Court sitting in London; (4) the King's/Queen's Bench Division of the High Court, exercising supervisory and appellate criminal jurisdiction; and (5) the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), which hears appeals from the Crown Court.
3. SPECIALTY AND PREROGATIVE COURTS: Historically, courts operating outside the common law framework — including the Court of Star Chamber (abolished 1641), the Court of High Commission, and various ecclesiastical courts — exercised significant jurisdiction. The House of Lords functioned as the final appellate court until abolished in that role by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, replaced by the UK Supreme Court.
4. COURTS FOR PEERS: Charges of treason, felony, or misprision against peers of the realm were historically tried either before the full House of Lords or before the Court of the Lord High Steward, a specialized tribunal convened for that purpose. This jurisdiction was abolished by the Criminal Justice Act 1948.
---
Common Confusion
Two persistent confusions arise in research. First, the "Supreme Court of Judicature" created by the Judicature Acts 1873–1875 is not the same institution as the "UK Supreme Court" created by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. The former was an internal reorganization of the existing English court structure; the latter is a separate apex court replacing the appellate jurisdiction of the House of Lords. Researchers conflating the two will misread the appellate chain in any source spanning 1875 to the present. Second, "King's Bench" and "Queen's Bench" are the same court — the name shifts with the sovereign's gender — and it has existed in different structural configurations across centuries, most recently as a division of the High Court of Justice.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
The principal structural eras:
PRE-1875 (Common Law Period): Separate superior courts of record — King's/Queen's Bench (criminal jurisdiction and supervisory writs), Common Pleas (private civil actions between subjects), Exchequer (revenue matters, later expanded), and Chancery (equity) — operated in parallel with courts of Probate, Admiralty, and Divorce. Inferior courts included County Courts, Petty Sessions, and Quarter Sessions.
POST-1875 (Judicature Act Period): The Supreme Court of Judicature consolidated the superior civil courts into the High Court of Justice (with divisions: King's/Queen's Bench, Chancery, Probate/Divorce/Admiralty, later reorganized) and the Court of Appeal. Criminal jurisdiction remained structurally separate through Assizes and Quarter Sessions until the Courts Act 1971 created the Crown Court.
POST-2005 (Constitutional Reform Period): The UK Supreme Court assumed the House of Lords' appellate role. The Lord Chancellor ceased to be head of the judiciary. The Judicial Appointments Commission was established. The modern civil structure comprises the Magistrates' Courts, County Courts, High Court, Court of Appeal, and UK Supreme Court.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The court structure is not background information — it is the navigational map. A researcher tracing appellate history, jurisdictional disputes, or doctrinal development must identify which court system was operative at the relevant date.
Several traps are common. First, sources written before 1875 will describe a court landscape that ceased to exist after the Judicature Acts. Bouvier's and Anderson's both reflect a transitional moment, and their descriptions of English courts may be partly pre-Judicature and partly post-Judicature depending on edition. Second, Petty Sessions and Quarter Sessions — the standard criminal inferior courts referenced in pre-20th-century sources — no longer exist by those names. Petty Sessions became Magistrates' Courts; Quarter Sessions were abolished by the Courts Act 1971 when the Crown Court was created. Third, the Central Criminal Court predates and survived both reorganizations, but its jurisdictional relationship to surrounding courts changed substantially in each era.
For researchers working in the Law Mind corpus: materials covering English criminal procedure before 1948 should be read with awareness that peer privilege in criminal trials was a live jurisdictional issue. Materials covering civil equity before 1875 require understanding that Chancery and common law courts operated under distinct procedures and could reach conflicting results on the same underlying facts — a fusion that the Judicature Acts resolved in equity's favor when conflicts arose.
Researchers using Anderson's Dictionary should note its description of the Judicature Acts reflects conditions as of their effective date (November 1, 1875) and does not account for subsequent divisional reorganizations within the High Court.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Anderson's Dictionary provides the most explicit structural description, accurately characterizing the Judicature Acts of 1873 (36 & 37 Vict. c. 66) and 1875 (38 & 39 Vict. c. 77) as consolidating the High Court of Chancery, Queen's Bench, Common Pleas, Exchequer, Admiralty, Probate, and Divorce into a Supreme Court of Judicature with two divisions — the High Court of Justice and the Court of Appeal. This account is historically accurate and remains useful for framing the post-1875 transition.
Bouvier's Dictionary, in its treatment of criminal courts, identifies six ordinary criminal courts — Petty Sessions, Quarter Sessions, the Assizes, the Central Criminal Court, the King's Bench Division, and the Court of Criminal Appeal — plus the House of Lords and the Court of the Lord High Steward for peers. This accurately describes the English criminal structure as it stood in the early twentieth century, before the Courts Act 1971 abolished Assizes and Quarter Sessions. Researchers should not assume this structure persists into the modern period.
Neither source addresses the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 or the UK Supreme Court, which is expected given their dates of composition but must be noted explicitly: any researcher relying on these dictionaries for the modern appellate structure will be working with an incomplete picture.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The courts described here exercise jurisdiction in England and Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland maintain separate court systems under the UK constitutional structure. Matters arising in those jurisdictions follow distinct procedural and substantive frameworks, though the UK Supreme Court serves as the final appellate court for all three systems in most civil matters.
---