incident to the jurisdiction of the sheriff. It seems to have had cognizance of purely personal actions and of some real actions; but it was not a court of record.1 Since 1846, a tribunal, established under 9 and 10 Vict. c. 95, in upward of five hundred districts, none within the city of London; and at present invested with a common-law jurisdiction over demands not exceeding £50, an equity jurisdiction where the amount involved does not exceed £500, together with certain jurisdiction in probate, admiralty, and bankruptcy.2 County officer. One by whom a county performs its usual political functions, - its functions of government; who exercises "continuously, and as a part of the regular and permanent administration of government, its public powers, trusts, or duties." 3 He may be the auditor, commissioner, supervisor, treasurer, or other functionary of the county. Local statutes usually designate who shall be considered county officers, and prescribe their duties. County purpose. May include only the ordinary purposes, as the ordinary expenses, of a county.4 County seat. See PERMANENT. Power of the county. The male inhabitants of a county, over fifteen years of age, whom the sheriff may command to aid him in preserving the peace, executing process, arresting felons, etc.; the posse comitatus. See SHERIFF; CORONER; WARRANT, 2 (2). Something "cut off" from another thing: a distinct part of a document or instrument, intended to be separated from the body thereof and used as evidence of something connected with it or mentioned in it. Coupon bond. Ordinarily, by "coupon" is meant a part of a transferable bond or certificate of loan, designed to be separated therefrom and used as evidence of interest due by the terms thereof. The original or primary obligations are called coupon bonds. 1 See 3 Bl. Com. 35; 3 Law Quar. Rev. 1-13 (1887). 2 See 1 Abbott, Law Dict. 299; 59 Law Times, 379 (1875). 3 [Sheboygan County v. Barker, 3 Wall. 96 (1866), Grier, J. See Re Whiting, 2 Barb. 517 (1848); Re Carpenter, 7 id. 34 (1849); State, ex rel. v. Glenn, 7 Heisk. 472 (1872). McCormick v. Fitch, 14 Minn. 257 (1869). See also 23 Ohio St. 339; 1 Sneed, 637. 1. Bl. Com. 343; 4 id. 122; Regina v. Brown, 1 Carr. & Μ. *314 (1841). Koo'-pong. F. from couper, to cut, cut off. An instrument complete in itself, and yet composed of several distinct instruments, each of which is in itself as complete as the whole together.1 Such coupons are merely interest-warrants or interest-certificates - written contracts for the payment of a definite sum of money on a given day.2 Most of the bonds of municipal bodies and private corporations are issued in order to raise funds for works of large extent and cost, and their payment is therefore made at distant periods. Coupons for the installments of interest are usually attached, in the expectation that they will be paid as they mature, however distant the period for the payment of the principal. These coupons, when severed from the bonds, are negotiable and pass by delivery. They then cease to be incidents, become in fact independent claims; and they do not lose their validity, if for any cause the bonds are canceled or paid before maturity, nor their negotiable character, nor their ability to support separate actions. Once severed from the bonds, and having matured, they are in effect equivalent to separate bonds for the different installments of interest. The holder is enabled to collect the interest at the time and place named, or to transfer the coupon to another who may collect it, without the trouble of presenting the bond itself. This is a convenience to the foreign holder. The device tends to enhance the marketableness of interest-bearing securities, and is favored by the courts. The form does not change their nature. That they are payable at a particular place does not make it necessary to aver or prove a presentation for payment there.5 Suit may be maintained upon a coupon without producing the bond; but the provisions in the bond must be recited in such a general way as to explain the relation the coupon originally held, and still holds, to it. Recovery may then be had for the face amount, with interest from the day when payment was unjustly refused, and exchange at the place of payment.4 When a coupon upon its face refers to the bond, the purchaser is chargeable with notice of all that the bond contains. These separable obligations bear interest after their maturity. An unpaid coupon left on a bond is not of itself evidence that the bond is dishonored." Interest coupons are instruments of a peculiar nature. Title to them passes by mere delivery. A 12 Daniel, Neg. Inst. § 1488 (1879). See Myers v. York, &c. R. Co., 43 Me. 239-40 (1857); Ethoven v. Hoyle, 13 C. В. 372 (1853). 2 Aurora City v. West, 7 Wall. 105 (1868), cases. 3 Clark v. Iowa City, 20 Wall. 589 (1874), cases, Field, J.; Hartman v. Greenhow, 102 U. S. 684 (1880); Walnut v. Wade, 103 id. 696 (1880); Thompson v. Perrine, 106 id. 592 (1882); Kerr v. City of Corry, 105 Pa. 282 (1884). City of Kenosha v. Lamson, 9 Wall. 477, 482-85 (1869), Nelson, J. 5 Walnut v. Wade, 103 U. S. 695 (1880). • McLure v. Township of Oxford, 94 U. S. 432 (1876), Waite, C. J. 7 Indiana & Illinois Central R. Co. v. Sprague, 103 U. S. 761-63 (1880), cases.