Definition
Counterfesance is an archaic legal term denoting the act of forging — the fraudulent making or alteration of a writing, instrument, or document with intent to deceive. The term encompasses what modern law treats under forgery and, in some contexts, counterfeiting. It appears primarily in early common law sources and has no independent standing in contemporary legal usage.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Forgery; counterfeiting.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "The act of forging; forgery." Marked as obsolete, with the variant spelling counterfaisance also recorded.
The common and legal meanings are essentially the same here, which is itself telling: counterfesance was never a technical term of art with a meaning distinct from its plain sense. Its value to researchers is historical rather than doctrinal — the term signals the age of a source, not a distinct legal concept.
---
Common Confusion
Counterfesance, forgery, and counterfeiting are not synonyms in modern law, though they overlapped significantly in early usage. Modern forgery focuses on fraudulent making or alteration of written instruments. Counterfeiting in contemporary law typically refers to the unauthorized reproduction of currency, official seals, or trademarked goods. Counterfesance, as an archaic umbrella, may appear in historical sources in contexts that modern law would parse as one or the other — or as fraud more generally. Researchers should not import the precision of modern distinctions when reading older materials that use counterfesance loosely.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Counterfesance is a marker term. When you encounter it in a primary or secondary source, it signals that the source predates the consolidation of forgery doctrine in the nineteenth century — likely placing the text in the early modern or medieval common law period, or in a treatise drawing on those sources.
The Rapalje & Lawrence entry is notably sparse and appears corrupt or truncated: "The act writing signed by the principal or superior, to of forging." This reads as a damaged or poorly typeset entry, not a complete definition. Researchers relying on that entry should treat it with caution and cross-check against Webster's 1913 and older law dictionaries such as Tomlin's or Bouvier's for more complete treatments of the term's historical scope.
Because counterfesance has no modern statutory or case law footprint, it will not appear in legal databases as a searchable doctrine. It survives only in historical legal dictionaries, early treatises, and digitized common law texts. Corpus researchers working in Law Mind's historical primary source collections should treat it as a period-specific synonym for forgery and search accordingly.
One research trap: the variant spelling counterfaisance (noted in Webster's 1913) may produce different search results than counterfesance or counterfeasance. Running all three spellings is advisable when conducting exhaustive historical searches.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Webster's 1913 and Wiktionary agree on the core meaning — forgery or counterfeiting — and both treat the term as obsolete. Webster's adds the variant spelling counterfaisance, which suggests French-influenced orthography consistent with the Norman legal vocabulary that shaped early English law.
Rapalje & Lawrence include the entry but the surviving text is fragmentary. What can be recovered suggests a definition touching on the signing of instruments by a principal or superior, which may reflect a narrower historical usage focused on the fraudulent authentication of documents by someone in authority — a nuance that the bare gloss "act of forging" in Webster's does not preserve. This divergence, however slight, is worth noting for researchers working on questions of authority and authentication in historical legal instruments.
No major modern legal dictionary (Black's, Ballentine's) carries a substantive entry for counterfesance, confirming its status as a term that did not survive the codification era.
---
Jurisdictional Note
No modern jurisdiction uses counterfesance as an operative legal term. Forgery and counterfeiting statutes govern the underlying conduct in all U.S. jurisdictions and in English law. Historical usage of counterfesance was predominantly English common law, and American colonial sources may carry it as a borrowing from that tradition.
---