Definition
A Latin term from Roman civil law meaning to corrupt, to spoil, or to make worse (*deteriorem facere*). In its primary legal application, *corrumpere* described the wrong of tampering with another person's slave — inducing the slave to misbehave, flee, become disobedient, or otherwise diminish in value or usefulness to the owner. The term carried a broader conceptual sense of causing deterioration or degradation in a thing or person, but its operative legal meaning in the classical sources was tied specifically to this actio servi corrupti context.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Corrumpere" is not a standard English word. Its English derivative "corrupt" means to cause to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain; to debase or make impure.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not entered as an English term. "Corrupt" (the derived English word) is defined as tainted with wickedness or moral impurity; spoiled or putrid.
The English word "corrupt" has inherited part of *corrumpere*'s semantic range — the moral and dishonest dimensions — while shedding the specific Roman law meaning tied to interference with another's slave. A researcher encountering *corrumpere* in a historical legal text should not read it as a general term for bribery or moral corruption without confirming context; the civil law usage was narrower and proprietary in character.
---
Why It Matters in Research
*Corrumpere* is a term researchers will encounter almost exclusively in materials engaging directly with Roman civil law or early modern treatises that drew on the Digest. It rarely appears in common law sources except as learned borrowing, and when it does, it is typically in discussions of Roman law analogies rather than as operative doctrine.
Several research traps arise:
First, the term's derivative "corrupt" has wandered far from its original legal meaning. Encountering *corrumpere* in a 16th or 17th century treatise does not mean the author is discussing bribery or official misconduct. The proprietary-harm sense — damage to another's slave — was the technical legal usage, while moral corruption was the broader literary sense.
Second, the Digest reference (Dig. 11.3) points to the *actio servi corrupti*, a specific Roman delict. Researchers working in Roman law, legal history, or comparative law who encounter *corrumpere* should trace it to this action, which was available to a slave owner against anyone who had induced the slave to misconduct. Understanding the *actio servi corrupti* is essential to understanding how this term functioned operationally.
Third, researchers working in ecclesiastical law or canon law sources may encounter *corrumpere* in a different register — sometimes meaning to corrupt testimony, to falsify documents, or to commit sexual violation — which are distinct from the civil law proprietary-harm usage. Context and source type must govern interpretation.
The term is a signal, not a self-defining label. When it appears, it calls for identification of which legal tradition the author is drawing from before any analytical weight is placed on it.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary provides the operative entry: *corrumpere* means to corrupt, to spoil, to make worse (*deteriorem facere*), and is applied to the offence of tampering with another's slave, with reference to Digest 11.3 and Brissonius's *De Verborum quae ad Ius Pertinent Significatione* — a standard early modern lexicon of Roman legal terminology.
Burrill's treatment is accurate as far as it goes, but compressed. It does not distinguish between the physical sense of making a thing worse (spoiling goods, for instance) and the specific delictual application to slaves. The Digest reference is the more important guide for a researcher who needs to understand how the term actually operated in Roman legal practice.
What historical legal dictionaries generally miss: *corrumpere* as a concept fed into later natural law and early modern criminal law discussions of what it means to cause deterioration of another's legal interest — a thread that becomes relevant in comparative legal history even when the specific slave-law context has dropped away. That intellectual inheritance is not traceable through dictionary entries alone and requires engagement with the treatise literature.
---
Jurisdictional Note
*Corrumpere* is a term of Roman civil law with no direct operative role in English common law jurisdictions. It appears in Scots law materials and in civilian-influenced legal systems where Roman law retained authority. Researchers working in Louisiana, Quebec, South Africa, or other mixed or civilian jurisdictions may encounter it in historical sources with greater frequency than those working in purely common law archives.
---