Payment by one or more persons who are liable, in company with others, of a proportionate part of the whole liability or loss, to one or more of the parties so liable upon whom the whole loss has fallen or who has been compelled to discharge the whole liability. 1 Bibb 562 : 4 Johns. Ch. 545; Pars. Part. 198. "The principle is that parties having a common interest in a subject-matter shall bear equally any burden affecting it. Qur sentit commodum sentire debit et onus. Equality is equity. One shall not bear a common burden in ease of the rest. Hence, if, (as often may be done), a lien, charge, or burden of any kind, affecting several, is en- forced at law against one only, he should receive from the rest what he has paid or discharged on their behalf. This is the doc- trine of equitable contribution, resting on as simple a principle of natural justice as can be put." Per Bates, Ch., in 3 Del. Ch. 260. 3 Co. 11 b; 1 Cox, C. C. 318; 1 B. & P. 270; 4 Johns. Ch. 388; 1 Sto. Eq. 477; 1 Wh. & Tud. L. Cas. in Eq. 66. Though its most common application is to sureties and owners of several parcels of land subject to a lien, the application of the principal is said to be universal by Ld. Redesdale in 3 Bligh 50; and it applies equally to dower as to other incumbrances; 3 Del. Ch. 260; Wright, Ohio 285. A right to contribution exists in the case of debtors who owe a debt jointly which has been collected from one of them; 4 Jones, N. C. 71; 4 Ga. 545; 19 Vt. 59;3 Denio 130; 7 Humph. 385. See 1 Ohio St. 827. It also exists where land charged with a legacy, or the portion of a pos- thumous child, descends or is devised to several persons, when the share of each is held liable for a proportionate part; 8 Munf. 29; 1 Johns. Ch. 425; 1 Cush. 107; 8 Β. Monr. 419. As to contribution under the maritime law, see GENERAL AVERAGE. See, generally, 4 Gray 75; 84 Me. 205; 11 Pa. 325; 8 B. Monr. 187; 51 Vt. 253; 77 Ν. Υ. 280; 82 N. C. 334; 61 Ala. 440; 53 Cal. 686; 52 Iowa 597; 127 Mass. 396; 16 Blatchf. 122. Originally this right was not enforced at law, but courts of common law in modern times have assumed a jurisdiction to com- pel contribution among sureties in the absence of any positive contract, on the ground of an implied assumpsit, and each of the sureties may be sued for his respec- tive quota or proportion; Wh. & Tud. Lead. Cas. 66; 7 Gill 34, 85; 17 Mo. 150. The remedy in equity is, however, much more effective; 12 Ala. N. S. 225; 2 Rich. Eq. 15; Bisp. Eq. § 329. For example, a surety who pays an entire debt can, in equity, compel the solvent sureties to contribute towards the payment of the entire debt; 1 Ch. Cas. 346; Finch 15, 203; while at law he can recover no more than an aliquot part of the whole, regard being had to the number of co-sureties; 2 B. & P. 268; 6 B. & C. 697; 82 Me. 381. See SUBROGATION. See, gener- ally, as to co-sureties, 1 Lead. Cas. Eq. 100; 13 Am. L. Reg. N. S. 529. There is no contribution, as a general rule, between joint tort-feasors; 8 T. R. 186; 82 Ind. 488; 32 Md. 245; 8 Ohio 81; 11 Paige 18; 10 Cush. 287; 2 Ohio St. 203; 18 Ohio 1; but this rule does not apply when the person seeking redress did not in fact know that the act was unlawful, and is not chargeable with knowledge of that fact; 4 Bing. 72; 26 Ala. 633; 28 Conn. 455; 92 N. C. 148; 66 Pa. 218. See 28 Alb. L. J. 148; 4 A. & E. Encyc. 12, 13. The rule stated also fails when the injury grows out of a duty resting primarily upon one of the parties, and but for his negligence there would have been no cause of action against the other. A servant is consequent- ly liable to his master for the damages re- covered against the latter in consequence of the negligence of the servant; 2 Sm. Lead. Cas. 483. Where a recovery is had against a municipal corporation for an in- jury resulting from an obstruction to the highway, or other nuisance, occasioned by the act or default of its servant, or even of a citizen, the municipality has a right of action against the wrongdoer for indem- nity; 2 Black 418. In Civil Law. A partition by which the creditors of an insolvent debtor divide among themselves the proceeds of his prop- erty proportionably to the amount of their respective credits. La Code, art. 2522, n. 10. It is a division pro rata. Merlin, Répert.