CONTRAOT

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

← Dictionary
CONTRAOTAuthored
The Law Mind • 928 words
Definition
A contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties, creating mutual obligations. For an agreement to qualify as a contract, the law generally requires offer, acceptance, consideration, and the capacity of the parties to agree. Courts distinguish contracts from mere promises, gifts, and social arrangements by examining whether the parties intended to be legally bound and whether something of value was exchanged.
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A binding agreement between two or more persons or entities, typically enforceable by law. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "An agreement between two or more parties, for the doing or not doing of some specified thing." The gap between common and legal meaning is narrow but important. In ordinary speech, people use "contract" to describe virtually any agreement or deal, including handshake understandings and informal arrangements. In law, the term is technical: not every agreement is a contract. The absence of consideration, a lack of mutual assent, or incapacity of a party can render what feels like a "contract" in common speech entirely unenforceable.
Core Elements
The classical common law framework requires: 1. Offer — A definite proposal by one party to another expressing willingness to be bound on stated terms. 2. Acceptance — Unqualified assent to the terms of the offer by the offeree. 3. Consideration — Something of legal value given or promised by each party in exchange for the other's promise. 4. Capacity — Each party must be legally competent to contract (of age, sound mind, not under legal disability). 5. Legality — The subject matter and purpose must not violate law or public policy.
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) identifies several compound forms: - Contract of record: A contract that has been declared and adjudicated by a court having jurisdiction. Judgments and recognizances fall into this category. Because the court's record itself constitutes the obligation, such contracts are enforced differently from simple contracts. - Contract of benevolence: A contract made for the benefit of one contracting party only — such as a mandate or a deposit. These are sometimes called gratuitous contracts and present distinct analytical issues around consideration and enforceability. - Implied contract (referenced in source): One whose existence and terms are inferred by law from the nature and circumstances of the transaction, rather than from express words. Courts derive these from conduct, dealing, and the surrounding context.
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in historical legal sources face two primary traps with this term. First, the taxonomy of contracts has shifted. Older sources — including the Black's 2nd Ed. fragment here — use classifications like "contract of record," "special contract," and "simple contract" that are either obsolete or carry different weight in modern doctrine. A contract of record in historical sources is not what a modern researcher would call a written contract; it is a court-created obligation. Conflating the two leads to serious misreading. Second, the implied/express contract distinction has fractured in modern law. What Black's 2nd Ed. calls an implied contract has been subdivided by most modern courts and scholars into "implied-in-fact contracts" (true contracts inferred from conduct) and "quasi-contracts" or "implied-in-law contracts" (equitable obligations imposed to prevent unjust enrichment, which are not true contracts at all). Historical sources use "implied contract" to cover both, so researchers must determine which concept a historical source is actually addressing. For corpus researchers: contract law is heavily jurisdictional in application but relatively uniform in foundational vocabulary across common law systems. The Law Mind corpus will surface significant variation in how 19th-century courts handled consideration doctrine, particularly in the United States versus England, and in the treatment of contracts made without formalities.
Historical Dictionary Support
The Black's 2nd Ed. source fragment is partial but instructive. It confirms that even early American legal lexicography organized contracts by their source of obligation (law vs. agreement) and by their beneficiary structure (bilateral benefit vs. unilateral benefit). The "contract of benevolence" entry aligns with civilian contract taxonomy, reflecting the mixed civil/common law heritage visible in some American jurisdictions. What historical dictionaries of this era consistently underemphasize is the developing doctrine of promissory estoppel — the principle that a promise without consideration may nonetheless be enforceable if the promisee reasonably relied on it. This doctrine, crystallized in the Restatement (First) of Contracts (1932), is largely absent from 19th-century dictionary treatments. Researchers should not read silence on reliance-based enforcement in historical sources as evidence that such claims were categorically unavailable; the doctrine was emerging through case law before it was named.
Jurisdictional Note
Louisiana's civil law tradition produces significant variation from the common law contract framework used elsewhere in the United States. Researchers working with Louisiana materials should treat standard common law contract vocabulary with caution. International researchers should note that common law consideration doctrine has no direct civilian equivalent.
Related Terms
Agreement — Offer — Acceptance — Consideration — Capacity — Quasi-contract — Contract of record — Implied contract — Promissory estoppel — Breach of contract — Void contract — Voidable contract — Unenforceable contract — Covenant — Deed — Obligation
CONTRAOTmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
one which must be made out, and its terms ascertained, by the inference of the law from the nature and circumstances of the transaction. Compound words and phrases.—Contract of benevolence. A contract made for the benefit of one of the contracting parties only, as a mandate or deposit.—Contract of record. A contract of record is one which has been declared and adjudicated by a court having jurisdiction, or which is entered of record in oO ence to, or in carrying out, the judgments of a court. Code Ga. 1882, § 2716.— Contract of sale. A contract by which one of the comacaae parties, called the “seller,” enters into an obligation to the other to cause _ him to have freely, by a title of proprietor, a thing, for the price of a certain sum of money, which the other contracting party, called the “buyer,” on his part obliges himself to o fay: Poth. nt.; Civ. Code La. 1900, art. 2439; White v. Treat (C. C.) 100 Fed. 291; Sawmill Co. v. O’Shee, 111 La. 817, 35 South. 919.— Pre-contract. An obligation growing out of a contract or contractual relation, of such a nature that it debars the party from legally entering into a similar contract at‘a later time with any other person; particularly applied to marriage.—Quasi contracts. In the civil law. A contractual relation arising out of transactions between the parties which give them mutual rights and obligations, but do not involve a specific and express convention or agreement between them. eener, Quasi Contr. 1; Brackett v. Norton, 4 Conn. 524. 10 Am. Dec. 1793 People v. Speir, 77 N. Y. 150; Willard v. Doran, 48 Hun, 402. 1 N. Y. Supp. 588: MeSorley v. Faulkner (Com. Pl.) 18 N. Y. Supp. 460 ; Reilwes Co. v. Gaffney, 65 Ohio St. 104 61 N. 153. Quasi contracts are the lawful and purely voluntary acts of a man, from which there results any obligation whatever to a third rson, and sometimes a reciprocal obligation etween the parties. Civ. Code La. art. 2293. Persons who have not contracted with each other are often regarded by the Roman law, under a certain state of facts, as if they had actually concluded a convention between themselves. ‘The legal relation which then takes place between these persons, which has always a similarity to a contract obligation, is there fore termed “obdbligatio quast ez contractu.” Such a relation arises from the conducting of affairs without authority, (ncgotiorum gestio,) from the payment of what was not due. (solutio indebiti,) from tutorship and curatorship, and from taking possession of an_ inheritance. Mackeld. Rom. Law, 491.—Subcontract. A contract subordinate to another contract, made or intended to be made between the contracting parties, on one part, or some of them, and a stranger. 1H. Bl. 37.45. Where a person has contracted for the performance of certain work, (e. g., to build a house,) and he in turn engages a third party to perform the whole or a part of that which is included in the original contract, (e. g., to do the carpenter work.) his agreement with such third person is called a “‘subcontrnact,” and such person is called a “subcontractor.” Central Trust Railroad Co. ve C.) 54 Fed. 723: Houston, 101 N. C. 605, 8 S. E. 366.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In
The Law Mind Legal Dictionary. This is a legal research library, not a lawyer.
Dictionary • Encyclopedia • Sign In