CONTRALIGATIO

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

CONTRALIGATIOAuthored
The Law Mind • 643 words
Definition
A Latin term from old English law meaning counter-obligation or counter-binding. Contraligatio describes the reciprocal binding force inherent in an obligation — the idea that an obligation, by its nature, binds both parties in a mutual or corresponding way. The term is drawn from the medieval juristic gloss that obligatio (obligation) is itself quasi contraligatio: as if a counter-binding. It is a term of legal philosophy and historical doctrine rather than a term of art applied in pleading or practice.
Common Confusion
Contraligatio is sometimes encountered in proximity to contramandatio in historical dictionaries — Black's 2nd edition runs the two entries together in a single passage — and researchers scanning old sources may conflate them. They are unrelated: contraligatio concerns the theoretical structure of obligation, while contramandatio concerns the procedural act of countermanding a pleading day. The physical adjacency in older dictionary layouts is an artifact of alphabetical arrangement, not conceptual connection.
Why It Matters in Research
This term will surface almost exclusively in historical legal philosophy and treatise literature, not in case law or statutes. Researchers are most likely to encounter it when working through medieval English legal texts or their early modern commentaries, particularly Fleta. The term functions as an interpretive gloss on obligatio rather than as a standalone legal concept with its own doctrinal career. The primary research trap is treating contraligatio as a synonym for counter-obligation in the modern bilateral contract sense. The medieval usage is narrower and more philosophical: it explains the internal structure of obligation as a form of mutual binding, not a distinct contractual remedy or a separate legal relationship between two parties. A researcher reading Fleta or secondary discussions of it should understand contraligatio as a terminological aid to understanding what obligatio means, not as a freestanding cause of action or procedural category. Because all three source dictionaries trace the term to a single locus — Fleta, lib. 2, c. 56, § 1 — researchers who want the full context should go directly to that source. The dictionary entries offer no independent elaboration beyond the gloss itself.
Historical Dictionary Support
All three source dictionaries — Black's 1st edition, Black's 2nd edition, and Burrill's — are in complete agreement. Each provides an identical definition (counter-obligation; counter-binding), an identical Latin gloss (est enim obligatio quasi contraligatio), and an identical citation to Fleta, lib. 2, c. 56, § 1. There is no divergence among the sources, which is itself informative: this is a narrow historical term that entered the legal dictionary tradition through a single medieval source and was transmitted without elaboration or expansion. What the historical dictionaries do not provide is any doctrinal context — no discussion of how contraligatio related to the broader Roman-law category of obligatio as received into English law, no connection to contemporaneous English contract or debt doctrine, and no indication of whether the term appeared in pleading, in judicial reasoning, or solely in academic legal writing. Burrill, generally more expansive than Black's on etymology and civilian influence, adds nothing beyond the shared formula. This uniformity suggests the term was recognized as historically significant but never developed an independent doctrinal life in English law. Fleta itself — a late thirteenth-century English legal treatise written in Latin and closely modeled on Bracton — is the authoritative source here. The passage cited uses contraligatio to illuminate the concept of obligatio by breaking down the word etymologically and conceptually, a characteristic method of medieval juristic writing. Researchers relying solely on the dictionary entries will have the gloss but not the surrounding argument.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Obligation (Historical); Medieval English Law and the Civilian Tradition
Related Terms
Obligatio — Contramandatio — Counter-obligation — Obligation (civil law) — Fleta — Bracton — Mutual obligation — Binding force of contract
CONTRALIGATIOmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
In old English D law. Counter-obligation. Literally, coun- ter-binding. Est enim obligatio quasi con- traligatio. Fleta, lib. 2, c. 56, § 1.
CONTRALIGATIOmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1867
L. Lat. In old English law. Counter obligation. Literally, counter-binding. Est enim obligatio quasi contraligatio. Fleta, lib. 2, c. 56, § 1.
CONTRALIGATIOmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
In old English law. Counter-obligation. Literally, counter-binding. Est enim obligatio quasi contraligatio. Fleta, lib. 2, c. 56, § 1. _ CONTRAMANDATIO. A countermanding. Contramandatio placiti, in old English law, was the respiting of a defendant, or giving him further time to answer, by countermanding the day fixed for him to plead, and appointing a new day; a sort of imparlance. “ CONTRAMANDATUM. A lawful excuse, which a defendant in a suit by attorney alleges for himself to show that the plaintiff has no cause of complaint. Blount.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In