CONTRACAUSATOR

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

CONTRACAUSATORAuthored
The Law Mind • 549 words
Definition
A criminal; a person who is being prosecuted for a crime. The term appears in medieval and early modern legal Latin and denotes the accused party in a criminal proceeding — one who stands against (contra) a cause or charge brought by the state or a complainant. It is not a term of art with technical distinctions or elements; it functions as a Latin label for the defendant in a criminal matter.
Common Confusion
The term is occasionally encountered in Latin legal texts alongside causator, which could denote a party to a legal action more generally, or one who brings or argues a cause. Researchers should not assume contracausator refers to an opposing counsel or adversarial party in a civil sense. The prefix contra here signals the position of the accused standing against the prosecution's cause, not an attorney or advocate appearing in opposition.
Why It Matters in Research
This term will surface almost exclusively in medieval Latin legal manuscripts, early common law treatises, and glossaries drawn from those sources. Bracton is the primary context in which the term circulates. Researchers working in pre-modern criminal procedure or consulting Latin legal records from the thirteenth through sixteenth centuries may encounter it as a synonym for reus (the accused) or as a descriptor for the defendant in criminal proceedings. The term has no living presence in modern legal practice. It does not appear in modern statutes, contemporary case law, or current procedural rules. Its sole research value is interpretive: understanding what role a named party played in a historical document. If you encounter contracausator in a Latin text, treat it as equivalent to "criminal defendant" or "accused" and do not search for technical distinctions that do not exist. The Bouvier's entry is contaminated — the historical dictionary source drifts mid-entry into the definition of CONTRACT, an unrelated term. This is an artifact of alphabetical adjacency in the original printed dictionary and carries no interpretive weight for contracausator itself.
Historical Dictionary Support
All four source dictionaries agree without variation: contracausator means a criminal, or one prosecuted for a crime. Black's (both editions), Bouvier's, and Rapalje & Lawrence are unanimous on this point, and none elaborates beyond a single sentence. The attribution in Bouvier's to Wharton likely refers to Francis Wharton's legal lexicography, which served as a common secondary source for nineteenth-century American law dictionaries drawing on Latin and common law terminology. The term is not defined with reference to any procedural stage, specific offense category, or court of origin, which suggests it functioned as a general descriptor rather than a term of precise legal art. No source offers a distinction between contracausator and other Latin terms for the accused, such as reus or accusatus. Historical dictionaries do not address how the term was used in practice or whether it carried any connotation beyond simple identification of the prosecuted party.
Related Terms
Defendant — the modern functional equivalent in criminal proceedings Accused — closest plain-English synonym Reus — parallel Latin term for the guilty party or defendant Causator — related Latin rootone who brings or argues a cause Criminal defendant — modern descriptive equivalent Prosecution — the proceeding against which a contracausator stands
CONTRACAUSATORmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
A criminal; one prosecuted for a crime.
CONTRACAUSATORmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
A criminal; one prosecuted for a crime. Wharton. CONTRACT (Lat. contractus, from con, with, and traho, to draw. Contractus ultro utroque obligatio est quam Græci συναλλαγμα vocant. Fr. contrał). An agreement between two or more parties to do or not to do a particular thing. Taney, C. J., 11 Pet. 420, 572. An agreement in which a party undertakes to do or not to do a particular thing. Mar- shall, C. J., 4 Wheat. 197. An agreement between two or more parties for the doing or not doing of some specified thing. 1 Pars. Com. 5. It has been also defined as follows: A compact between two or more parties. 6 Cra. 87, 186. An agreement ent or covenant between two or more per- sons, in which each party binds himself to do or forbear some act, and each acquires a right to what the other promises. Encyc. Amer.; Webster. A contract or agreement is where a promise is made on one side and assented to on the other; or where two or more persons enter into an engagement with each other by a promise on either side. 2 Steph. Com. 108, 109. An agreement upon sufficient consideration to do or not to do a particular thing. 2 Bla. Com. 446; 2 Kent 449. A covenant or agreement between two parties with a lawful consideration or cause. West, Sym- bol. lib. 1. §10: Cowel Blount. A deliberate engagement between competent parties upon a legal consideration to do or to ab- stain from doing some act. Story, Contr. $1. An agreement by which two parties reciprocally promise and engage, or one of them singly promises and engages to the other, to give some particular thing or to do or abstain from doing some partic- ular act. Pothier, Conts. Pt. 1, c. 1, §1; 36 Ch. D. 695. A mutual promise upon lawful consideration or cause which binds the parties to a performance. The writing which contains the agreement of parties with the terms and conditions, and which serves as a proof of the obligation. The last is a distinct signification. 2 Hill. N. Y. 551. A voluntary and lawful agreement by competent parties, for a good consideration, to do or not to do a specified thing. 9 Cal. 83. An agreement enforceable at law, made between two or more persons, by which rights are acquired by one or both to acts or forbearances on the part of the other. Anson, Contr. 9. A learned writer has said. in discussing the prop- er definition of contract, cont that "if we seek to build up a definition of the term 'contract which shall in- clude all things that have been called contracts and shall exclude all things that have been held not to be contracts, the task is evidently impossible. Any definition of contract therefore must be either arbitrary or inexact." Harriman, Contr. 4. The consideration is not properly included in the definition of contract, because it does not seem to be essential to a contract, although it may be neces- sary to its enforcement. See CONSIDERATION. Pars. Contr. 7. Mr. Stephen, whose definition of contract is given above, thus criticizes the definition of Blackstone. which has been adopted by Chancellor Kent and other high authorities. First, that the word agrer- ment itself requires definition as much as contract. Second, that the existence of a consideration, though essential to the validity of a parol contract, forms properly no part of the idea. Third, that the defini- tion takes no sufficient notice of the mutuality which properly distinguishes a contract from a promise. 2 Steph. Com. 109. The use of the word agreement (aggregatio men- tium) seems to have the authority of the best writers in ancient and modern times (see above) as a part of the definition of contract. It is probably a translation of the civil-law conventio (con and venio), a coming together. to which (being derived from ad and grez) it seems nearly equivalent. We do not think the objection that it is a synonym (or nearly so) a valid one. Some word of the kind is necessary as a basis of the definition. No two
CONTRACAUSATORmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888
-A criminal; one prosecuted for a crime.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In