Definition
In law, consequences refers to the results or effects that flow from an act, omission, or legal event — and, critically, to the degree to which a person is held responsible for those results. The term operates at the intersection of intent, foreseeability, and liability across both criminal and civil law.
The concept carries two related but distinct legal functions:
1. As a rule of attribution: The law presumes that a person of sound mind intends the natural and necessary consequences of their voluntary acts. This means that what flows predictably from conduct is treated as intended, whether or not the actor consciously desired that specific outcome.
2. As a descriptive category: "Consequences" describes what happens as a result of a legal event — a conviction, a judgment, a contract, a marriage — including effects that may not be obvious, immediate, or part of the core legal proceeding. These are often called collateral consequences.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Plural of consequence — results or effects that follow from an action or condition.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): That which follows something on which it depends; effect; result; conclusion. Also used to mean importance or significance, as in "a matter of great consequence."
The legal meaning does not radically diverge from ordinary usage, but it carries freight that the common definition omits. In law, consequences are not merely what happens next — they trigger presumptions about intent, they define the scope of liability, and they attach legal status to outcomes a party may never have anticipated. The lay reader understands consequences as effects; the legal researcher must also understand them as imputed intentions and as a structured category of rights-affecting outcomes.
---
Common Confusion
"Direct" versus "collateral" consequences is the most consequential distinction in modern legal usage, and it is frequently mishandled. A direct consequence is an immediate, definitive, and largely automatic result of a legal event — the incarceration or fine that follows a criminal sentence, for example. A collateral consequence is a legal disability or penalty imposed by operation of law as a result of conviction, but which falls outside the direct punishment: deportation, loss of voting rights, sex offender registration, professional license revocation. Courts have held that counsel must advise defendants of certain collateral consequences before a guilty plea is entered, but the boundary between "direct" and "collateral" is unsettled and varies by jurisdiction. Researchers conflating the two will miss critical constitutional and procedural issues.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The rule stated in Anderson — that persons of sound mind are presumed to intend the natural and necessary consequences of their acts — is foundational, but its application has narrowed significantly in criminal law. Modern doctrine, particularly following developments in specific intent analysis and mens rea reform, treats this presumption with more caution than historical sources suggest. Researchers using older authorities should not assume that the broad presumption Anderson describes maps cleanly onto contemporary criminal intent doctrine.
In criminal procedure, the collateral consequences framework has expanded dramatically. Plea validity, ineffective assistance claims, and post-conviction relief now turn in many jurisdictions on whether a defendant was adequately advised of consequences that extend far beyond the sentence itself. This is an area where the Law Mind criminal law encyclopedia entries are essential companions — the dictionary definition alone will not equip a researcher to navigate the current landscape.
Family law researchers face a parallel challenge: immigration consequences of marriage, divorce, and custody arrangements have become a distinct and technically demanding sub-area. The intersection of family courts and federal immigration law means that "consequences" in this context requires fluency in two separate bodies of doctrine that rarely speak to each other directly.
For tort and contract researchers, the term appears in the doctrine of proximate cause and in damages analysis, where the question is always which consequences are legally cognizable — i.e., foreseeable, not too remote, and within the scope of the defendant's duty or the parties' reasonable expectations. Historical treatises frequently use "consequences" in this sense without always distinguishing it from the criminal-intent usage.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Anderson's entry frames consequences primarily through the lens of the intent presumption in criminal and civil liability: persons of sound mind are held to intend the natural and necessary consequences of their acts, because experience has validated that rule as sound and safe. Anderson acknowledges exceptions — where the consequences are not matters of common knowledge or reasonable foreseeability — but treats them as deviations from a sturdy baseline rule.
What Anderson does not address is the modern bifurcation between direct and collateral consequences, which emerged from constitutional developments in plea procedure and from statutory proliferation of civil disabilities attached to criminal conviction. The historical dictionaries generally treat consequences as a unitary concept tied to intent and causation; the modern research environment requires the researcher to work with a much more elaborated taxonomy.
Anderson's framing remains useful for understanding the foundational presumption and for reading older case law that applies the natural-and-necessary-consequences rule. It is not a reliable guide to the collateral consequences doctrine or to the constitutional standards governing what courts and counsel must disclose.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction — The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia
Guilty Pleas — Voluntariness, Collateral Consequences, and Withdrawal — The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia
Family Law — Immigration Consequences of Marriage and Divorce — The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia
---