seizure and condemnation of the life-estate, with the fee left in the heirs.1 The act of 1861 made property a lawful subject of capture and prize. The object of the act of 1862 was to confiscate the property of traitors by way of punishment for countenancing the rebellion.2 The act of 1862, generally known as the Confiscation Act, and the joint resolution of the same day explanatory thereof, must be construed together. In a sale of property thereunder, all that could be sold was a right to the property seized, terminating with the life of the offender. Such sale does not affect the rights of a mortgagee in favor of a third person. The property goes to the Government or to the purchaser cum onere.3 Debts and credits, which are intangible, are nowhere confiscated. See ATTAINDER; PARDON; PROHIBITION, 2; WAR. Agreement; adjustment. A bill in equity filed by an executor or administrator, when he finds the affairs of the estate so much involved that he cannot safely administer the estate except under the 1 Wallach v. Van Riswich, 92 U. S. 207 (1875); Waples v. Hays, 108 id. 8 (1882). 2 Kirk v. Lynd, 106 U. S. 319 (1882); Phoenix Bank v. Risley, 111 id. 125 (1884). 3 Shields v. Schiff, 124 U. S. 356 (1888), Bradley, J.; Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. 308, 312-13 (1870); Avegno v. Schmidt, 35 La. An. 585 (1883): 113 U. S. 300 Alexander's Cotton, 2 id. 419 (1864). & Semmes v. United States, 91 U. S. 27 (1875). • Bigelow v. Forrest, 9 Wall. 350, 338 (1869); Miller v. United States, 11 id. 304, 268 (1870); Day v. Micou, 18 id. 160 (1873). (1885). 41 Kent, 64-65. See further 4 Cranch, 415; 6 id. 286; 8 id. 122, 128; 13 Wall. 351; 15 id. 591; 20 id. 92; 2 Dill. 555; Chase, Dec. 259; 111 U. S. 125, 52; 96 id. 176. See Story, Wharton, Conf. of Laws. (15)