Definition
A concealed weapon is a firearm or other deadly instrument carried on or about a person in a manner that is hidden from ordinary observation. The core legal question is whether the weapon is visible to the casual observer; a weapon need not be completely invisible to qualify as concealed — partial concealment is sufficient in most jurisdictions.
The term appears primarily in two legal contexts:
1. CARRYING CONCEALED WEAPONS (CCW): The act of bearing a deadly weapon on one's person in a concealed manner. This is a regulated or criminal act depending on whether the carrier holds a valid permit or license and complies with applicable law.
2. CONCEALED CARRY LICENSING: The regulatory framework — statutes, permits, and administrative rules — that governs who may legally carry a concealed weapon, under what conditions, and in what locations.
A "weapon" in this context is not limited to firearms. Knives, brass knuckles, batons, and other instruments capable of causing death or serious bodily harm have been treated as concealed weapons under various statutes, though many modern licensing regimes focus specifically on handguns and other firearms.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A weapon, typically a firearm, carried on one's person in a way not visible to others.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not separately defined; "conceal" means to hide or secrete from observation, and "weapon" means an instrument of offense or defense in combat.
The gap between common and legal meaning is narrow for the core concept but significant in application. Ordinary usage treats concealment as an all-or-nothing condition. Legal doctrine treats it as a spectrum — a weapon partially visible through clothing, or detectable by outline, may or may not satisfy the concealment element depending on the jurisdiction's standard. Additionally, "concealed weapon" in legal practice carries heavy regulatory and criminal consequence that the common usage does not convey.
---
Common Confusion
CONCEALED CARRY vs. OPEN CARRY: These are distinct legal categories. Open carry means bearing a weapon in plain view; concealed carry means bearing it hidden from observation. The two are regulated separately, and some jurisdictions permit one but not the other. Researchers working with historical statutes should not assume the modern open/concealed distinction was always present — early statutes often targeted all public carrying of certain weapons without the open/concealed distinction.
CONCEALED WEAPONS vs. DEADLY WEAPONS: Concealment and lethality are independent legal elements. A weapon may be deadly but openly carried, or concealed but legally possessed in a non-public setting. Statutes prohibiting concealed weapons and statutes prohibiting possession of deadly weapons are different instruments, often codified separately.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
SHALL-ISSUE LICENSING: The licensing authority must issue a concealed carry permit to any applicant who meets objective statutory criteria. Most U.S. states currently operate under shall-issue regimes.
MAY-ISSUE LICENSING: The licensing authority retains discretion to deny a permit even to a qualified applicant. Historically common; now limited to a small number of jurisdictions following recent constitutional litigation.
CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY (PERMITLESS CARRY): Statutes that allow qualifying individuals to carry concealed weapons without obtaining a permit. The name reflects the argument that no license should be required to exercise a constitutional right.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The legal landscape for concealed weapons has undergone dramatic change across three distinct periods, and corpus materials must be read with that chronology in mind.
Nineteenth-century sources treat concealed carry as presumptively criminal. Early state statutes — beginning in the 1810s and 1820s in Kentucky, Louisiana, and Georgia — flatly prohibited carrying concealed weapons, with courts upholding these laws as consistent with state police power even where state constitutions protected the right to bear arms. Researchers reading Bouvier or cases from this era will find concealed carry framed as a public safety evil, not a protected right.
Mid-to-late twentieth century sources reflect the rise of the licensing model. The question shifted from whether concealed carry could be prohibited to how it could be regulated. Shall-issue regimes spread rapidly in the 1980s and 1990s. Secondary literature and law review commentary from this period focuses heavily on policy arguments and statistical claims about crime effects.
Post-2008 and especially post-2022 sources must be read through the lens of constitutional litigation. District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) recognized an individual right to keep arms for self-defense in the home. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022) extended that analysis to public carry and struck down New York's may-issue licensing standard, holding that the Second Amendment protects carrying handguns publicly for self-defense. Bruen also mandated a new historical-analogy test for evaluating arms regulations, which has reshaped how courts assess concealed carry statutes across the country. Any Law Mind corpus materials predating 2022 on may-issue licensing or the constitutionality of concealed carry restrictions should be treated as potentially superseded.
Researchers should also watch for definitional variation in historical statutes. "Deadly weapon," "dangerous weapon," and "concealed weapon" are not synonymous across jurisdictions or time periods. Some nineteenth-century statutes covered only pistols and Bowie knives by name; others used broad deadly-weapon language. The scope of what was regulated — and what the permit, if any, authorized — varied considerably.
Finally, note the insurance law intersection: concealment in firearms-related insurance contexts (coverage for theft, liability, or self-defense use) is a separate doctrine governed by insurance law principles. Do not conflate that usage with the criminal/regulatory concealed weapons framework.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's entry is minimal — a citation pointer directing readers to American Reports volumes and cross-references to ARMS and WEAPON. This brevity is itself informative. By the time Bouvier's later editions were compiled, the statutory and case law on concealed weapons was already substantial enough that a treatise-style entry would have been impractical; the reader was directed to the case reporters directly.
The cross-reference structure signals that Bouvier treats concealed weapons as a subcategory within the broader law of arms regulation rather than as an independent doctrinal area. This reflects the nineteenth-century framing: concealed carry was a specific regulatory target within the general power to regulate weapons, not a constitutional flashpoint in its own right.
What Bouvier does not address — and what historical dictionaries generally miss — is the licensing dimension. The modern concealed carry permit system, with its administrative apparatus of applications, fees, training requirements, and reciprocity agreements, developed almost entirely after the period covered by classic legal dictionaries. Researchers relying on historical dictionary definitions alone will find them silent on this central feature of contemporary concealed weapons law.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Concealed weapons law is almost entirely state law, with significant variation. As of the mid-2020s, roughly half of U.S. states have enacted constitutional carry provisions; others retain shall-issue or (in a small number of jurisdictions, post-Bruen) modified may-issue frameworks. Federal law imposes baseline restrictions on who may possess firearms at all — convicted felons, domestic violence misdemeanants, and others — but does not create a federal concealed carry permit system. Reciprocity between states (whether one state honors another's permit) is governed by statute, not constitutional mandate, and varies considerably.
---