Plene computavit. He has accounted in full. A plea in the action of account-render that the defendant has fully accounted. Quod computet. That he account, - computent, that they account. An interlocutory judgment in accountrender or action of account, at law or in equity, that the defendant render an account before an auditor or a master.1 To hide, keep from view, cover up, secrete; to prevent discovery of; to withdraw from reach; to withhold information. 1. To hide or secrete a physical object from sight or observation.2 The act of March 2, 1799, authorizing the seizure of "concealed" goods, subject to duty, requires that the goods be secreted - withdrawn from view. It does not apply to a mere removal, though fraudulent.3 To "conceal property" in order to prevent its being taken on process includes not only physical concealment-literal secreting or hiding, but also the doing of any act by which the title of a party is concealed, - his property so covered up that it cannot be reached by process. The provision may apply to realty as well as to personalty.4 A horse may be "concealed" by destroying the means of identifying him. The word includes all acts which render the discovery or identification of property more difficult. A "concealed weapon" is a weapon willfully covered or kept from sight. See further WEAPON. 2. To shelter from observation; to harbor; to protect. See HARBOR, 1. 3. To withdraw to a place where one cannot be found; to abscond, q. v. "Concealment by a debtor to avoid the service of summons" involves an intention to delay or prevent creditors from enforcing their demands in the ordinary legal modes. It may be by the debtor's secreting himself upon his own premises, or by departing (1887), cases; Chicago, &c. R. Co. v. Catholic Bishop, secretly to a more secure place, in or out of the county 119 III. 531 (1887). 1 Jeffries v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York, 110 U. S. 309-10 (1884), cases. 21 Bates, Partn. §§ 382, 387, cases. 3 Whipple v. Whitman, 13 R. I. 512-15 (1882), cases; Township of North Whitehall v. Keller, 100 Pa. 108 (1882); Holker v. Parker, 7 Cranch, 452 (1813). See R. S. §§ 269, 273. See 3 BL. Com. 341-48. 3 Bl. Com. 164; 81 N. Y. 271. of his residence.7 13 Bl. Com. 164; 1 Story, Eq. § 548. 2 [Gerry v. Dunham, 57 Me. 339 (1869). 3 United States v. Chests of Tea, 12 Wheat. 486 (1827). 4 [O'Neil v. Glover, 5 Gray, 159 (1855); 4 Cush. 453. State v. Ward, 49 Conn. 442 (1881). • Owen v. State, 31 Ala. 389 (1858). 7 Dunn v. Salter, 1 Duv. 345 (1864). See also Frey v. Aultman, 30 Kan. 182, 184 (1883).