Definition
Common of shack is a species of common by vicinage: the right of persons who occupy strips or parcels of land lying together in the same common field to turn out their cattle after harvest to feed promiscuously — that is, intermingled without separation — across the entire field. The right arises not from any express grant but from the customary practice of neighboring occupiers in open-field agricultural communities, and it operates only during the aftermath season, once the harvest has been gathered and the field lies open.
The right is local in origin. It prevailed historically in the English counties of Norfolk, Lincoln, and Yorkshire, where the open-field system of agriculture persisted longest. As a common by vicinage, it is technically distinguished from common appurtenant (which attaches to land by grant or prescription and binds successors) and from common in gross (which belongs to a person rather than a dominant tenement). Common of shack is a communal arrangement among neighbors whose mutual occupation of adjacent strips in the same field creates reciprocal grazing rights by custom, not by deed.
---
Common Language
Wiktionary: "The right of persons occupying lands lying together in the same common field to turn out their cattle to range in it after harvest."
The Wiktionary definition accurately captures the functional substance but omits the doctrinal classification that matters for legal research. The word "shack" in this context is archaic agricultural English, not the modern sense of a crude dwelling. A researcher encountering "shack" in an old deed, field survey, or enclosure award who supplies the modern meaning of the word will misread the document entirely.
---
Common Confusion
Common of shack is frequently confused with common fishery and with common appurtenant. Black's Law Dictionary flags the fishery confusion directly. The more consequential confusion for property researchers is between common of shack and common appurtenant: common appurtenant requires a dominant tenement, attaches by grant or long prescription, and runs with the land to successors; common of shack rests on local custom among co-occupiers of the same open field and does not require an express grant. The two have different proofs, different defenses, and different outcomes in enclosure proceedings. Treating shack rights as appurtenant rights in historical title research will produce errors in both directions.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Common of shack is an almost entirely historical term. Its practical significance ended in England with the enclosure movement, which systematically extinguished customary common rights by parliamentary award from the seventeenth through nineteenth centuries. Researchers working in English property history, enclosure records, manorial documents, or early American colonial land systems adapted from English models will encounter the term in its active legal sense. Researchers working in modern Anglo-American property law will encounter it only as a historical curiosity or as a term requiring definition in old chain-of-title disputes.
Several navigational points bear emphasis:
First, the after-harvest limitation is essential. Common of shack operates only once the crop is removed. Any source describing grazing rights that exist during the growing season is describing a different right — likely common of pasture — not common of shack. The seasonal boundary is a precise doctrinal element, not a loose description.
Second, the "promiscuous" feeding language in historical sources is technical, not pejorative. It means the cattle of all right-holders mix together across the whole field without any occupier being confined to grazing only on his own strip. This indiscriminate character is what defines the right as a vicinage custom rather than a separately possessed right over a defined parcel.
Third, enclosure awards frequently extinguished common of shack without separately itemizing it. Researchers tracing the history of English common field rights should not assume that a general enclosure award preserving "all rights of common appurtenant" preserved shack rights — the two rested on different legal foundations and enclosure commissioners sometimes treated them differently.
Fourth, there is essentially no American case law developing this doctrine. Where American courts have addressed it at all, they have treated it as a rule of English common law without modern domestic application. Do not expect American secondary sources to supply the doctrinal detail that English sources provide.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary and Burrill's Law Dictionary are in agreement on the core definition: both define common of shack as a species of common by vicinage, limited to the counties of Norfolk, Lincoln, and Yorkshire, consisting of the right of co-occupiers of a common field to graze cattle promiscuously after harvest. Both cite Stephen's Commentaries and Coke (Co. 5, 65) as the primary authorities. Burrill adds Crabb's Real Property as a supporting treatise reference.
Neither historical dictionary entry develops the doctrinal distinction between common of shack and common appurtenant at length, which is the point most likely to trap a modern researcher. Burrill's entry ends abruptly mid-sentence, transitioning to "common in gross," which reflects the standard dictionary format of moving to the next sequential entry but leaves shack analytically underexplained. Black's note that common of shack "is quite different from a common fishery, with which it is frequently confounded" appears in what may be a neighboring entry (likely common of piscary) that was misattributed in the source data, but the warning is accurate regardless.
Stephen's Commentaries on the Laws of England (2 Steph. Comm. 6–7) remains the authoritative secondary source for the English law of common. Coke's Reports (5 Co. 65) supplies the primary authority. For enclosure history, researchers should look to the Inclosure Acts and local enclosure awards, which are primary sources not well represented in general legal dictionaries.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Common of shack is an English customary right with no meaningful independent development in American jurisdictions. It was part of the common law inheritance received by American courts but was effectively inapplicable in the absence of the open-field agricultural system that gave rise to it. Researchers in English, Welsh, or early colonial property history will find it operative; researchers in modern American property law will not.
---