COLLATERALES ET SOCI - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

COLLATERALES ET SOCIAuthored

The Law Mind • 832 words

Definition

*Collaterales et soci* is a Latin phrase from the medieval feudal and ecclesiastical legal vocabulary meaning, literally, "collaterals and associates" or "companions and fellows." In legal usage, the term referred to those persons who stood in a collateral relationship to a principal figure — whether a lord, a tenant, or a party to a legal instrument — as distinguished from those in a direct lineal relationship. The "soci" component (companions or associates) emphasized a bond of fellowship or joint standing, while "collaterales" pointed to a lateral, non-lineal connection in a hierarchy or kinship structure.

In its narrowest feudal application, the term described persons who shared a common ancestor or common lord without being in a direct ascending or descending line — that is, uncles, cousins, brothers, and other lateral kinsmen — as well as their associates in a joint legal or tenurial arrangement.

---

Why It Matters in Research

This term appears primarily in medieval Latin legal texts, feudal charters, and ecclesiastical records. Researchers encountering it in primary sources should be aware of several navigational considerations.

First, the phrase is compound and context-dependent. "Collaterales" alone has a well-developed legal history in English property law — most prominently in the doctrine of collateral warranty, where collateral heirs could be barred from claiming land by the acts of a warranting ancestor. The Bouvier source fragment excerpted in connection with this term relates directly to that doctrine: the heir in tail, faced with a collateral warranty running from an ancestor who discontinued the entail before the heir's birth, was estopped from claiming the land and was obliged to exchange assets. The addition of "et soci" (and associates/companions) extends the reference beyond pure blood relations to those holding a joint or associated standing — potentially co-tenants, mesne lords, or fellows in an ecclesiastical chapter or guild.

Second, researchers should not expect this precise compound phrase to appear frequently in English common law digests or Year Books in its full Latin form. It is more characteristic of continental civil law writing, canon law compilations, and the Latinized records of early English ecclesiastical courts. When encountered in a feudal grant or ecclesiastical instrument, it is often a catch-all formula sweeping in both lateral kinsmen and their associates as bound parties or beneficiaries.

Third, the term has essentially no post-medieval life in Anglo-American legal writing. By the time Blackstone systematized English property law and American courts began adapting it, the phrase had been absorbed into plain-language descriptions of collateral heirs and co-parties. A researcher finding it in a 19th-century American source is almost certainly encountering a quotation from or reference to an older authority, not contemporary usage.

Fourth, the collateral warranty doctrine itself — to which "collaterales" connects — was substantially abolished or modified by statute in England (Statute of Fines, later reforms) and was treated as largely obsolete in American jurisdictions well before the 20th century. Any research thread following this term into American property law will quickly encounter this statutory displacement.

---

Historical Dictionary Support

Bouvier's Law Dictionary does not provide a standalone entry for *collaterales et soci* as a compound phrase. The source material available connects the "collaterales" component to the doctrine of collateral warranty in the context of estates tail: where a tenant in tail made a collateral warranty that ran to a collateral heir, that heir was estopped from claiming the entailed land after the tenant's death, and if the heir held assets from the warranting ancestor, was required to yield equivalent lands to the warrantee. Bouvier cites Washburn on Real Property for this proposition.

The "et soci" portion receives no dedicated treatment in Bouvier, which reflects the general pattern of English-language legal dictionaries: they absorbed "collaterales" into doctrinal property law but treated "soci" as a term of civil and canon law with limited purchase in common law practice. Researchers needing fuller treatment of "soci" in its legal sense should consult civil law glossaries and Du Cange's *Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis*, which provides extensive medieval Latin legal vocabulary unavailable in common law dictionaries.

No major English-language legal dictionary of the standard reference shelf — not Bouvier, Black's, or Tomlin's — treats the compound phrase as a single term of art, which itself signals that its natural habitat is Latin primary sources rather than digested common law.

---

Jurisdictional Note

The compound phrase has no operative meaning in any modern American or English jurisdiction. Its relevance is confined to historical research in feudal land tenure, medieval ecclesiastical law, and the canon law tradition. The underlying concept of collateral heirship remains relevant in modern succession and property law, but is governed by statutory frameworks that do not employ this terminology.

---

COLLATERALES ET SOCImain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

discontinued as to his issue before his birth, the heir in tall was driven to his action to regain pos- session upon the death of his ancestor tenant in tail; and in this action the collateral warranty came in as an estoppel. 2 Washb. R. P. 670. The heir was barred from ever claiming the land, and, in case he had assets from the warranting ancestor, was obliged to give the warrantee other lands in case of an eviction. 4 Cruise, Dig. 436. By the statute of Gloucester, 6 Edw. I. c. 3, tenant by the curtesy was restrained from making such warranty as should bind the heir. By a favorable construction of the statute De Donis, and by the statute 3 & 4 Will. IV. c. 74, tenants in tail were de- prived of the power of making collateral warranty. By statute 11 Hen. VII. c. 20, warranty by a tenant in dower, with or without the assent of her subsequent hus- band, was prevented; and finally the statute 4 & 5 Anne, c. 16, declares all warranties by a tenant for life void against the heir, unless such ancestor has an estate of in- heritance in possession. See Co. Litt. 373, Butler's note [328]; Stearns, R. Act. 135 372. It is doubtful if the doctrine has ever pre vailed to a great extent in the United States, and the statute of Anne has not been gener- ally adopted in the American statute law, although re-enacted in New York; 4 Kent *469; and in New Jersey; 3 Halst. 106. It has been adopted and is in force in Rhode Island; 1 Sumn. 235; and in Delaware; 1 Harr. 50. In Kentucky and Virginia, it seems that collateral warranty binds the heir to the extent of assets descended; 1 Dana 59. In Pennsylvania, the statute of Gloucester is in force, but the statute of Anne is not, and a collateral warranty of the ancestor, with sufficient real assets de- scending to the heirs, bars them from re- covering the lands warranted; 104 Pa. 575. See 2 Bla. Com. 301; 2 Washb. R. P. 668. If the learning of collateral warranty has been called difficult, it is simply because the law of warranty came to be turned from the purpose of its, introduction, -that of protection and defence, and fashioned into a remedy to meet an entirely different purpose. Later, collateral warranty ceased to be used for the purpose of barring estates tail, and its use could never have been universal. Rawle, Cov. for Title, secs. 8, 9. See Litt. § 709; 12 Mod. 513; Year Book 12; Edw. IV. 19; Tudor, Lead. Cas. R. P. 695; Pig. Recov. 9.