a master to a servant, or of a principal to his agent, does not, ordinarily, amount to coercion. If a wife acts in company with her husband in the commission of a tort or a crime other than treason, homicide, or other heinous felony, it is presumed, at common law, that she acted under coercion and without guilty intent. But non-coercion may be proved.1 See DURESS; WILL, 2. A piece of metal stamped and made legally current as money.4 "Coin" and "coinage" apply to the stamping of metal in some way so as to give them currency.5 To coin "The Congress shall have Power Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign 1 Jones v. Commonwealth, 80 Va. 20 (1885), Fauntleroy, J. 2 See 1 Bishop, Mar. & D. § 777, note, cases; 116 U. S. 75; 4 Paige, 425. As a married right, 19 Cent. Law J. 142 (1884), cases. 3 Yardley's Estate, 75 Pa. 211 (1874), Agnew, C. J. See also Brinckle v. Brinckle, 34 Leg. Int. 428 (1877); Hynes v. McDermott, 91 N. Y. 459-62 (1883), cases; Teter v. Teter, 88 Ind. 498 (1883), cases; Appeal of Reading Fire Ins. & Trust Co., 113 Pa. 208 (1886), cases; 1 L. con, with; habitare, to have often, i. e., abide Whart. Ev. §§ 84-85, cases. with,-54 Me. 366. • [Calef v. Calef, 54 Me. 366 (1867), Appleton, C. J. • Cannon v. United States, 116 U. S. 55, 74-75 (1885). 4 United States v. Bogart, 9 Bened. 315 (1878), Wallace, J.; 5 Phila. 403; 16 Gray, 240. • Meyer v. Roosevelt, 25 How. Pr. 105 (1863).