Definition
An Old Scots law term referring to two related but distinct concepts: (1) the warranty given with respect to stolen cattle or goods — that is, the guarantee of lawful title or clean provenance attached to livestock or property at the time of transfer; and (2) the body of law governing such warranties. The term operated in a legal environment where cattle theft (reiving) was endemic, and the formal warranty of an animal's honest acquisition was a meaningful legal instrument rather than a mere formality. A seller who warranted goods under claremethen was vouching that they had not been stolen and assuming liability if that warranty proved false.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This is an archaic Scots law term with no modern successor of the same name. Researchers will encounter it almost exclusively in historical Scots legal sources, particularly those dealing with property transfer, livestock markets, and theft law in medieval and early modern Scotland. The term is essentially a period artifact: it does not survive into modern Scots law under this label, and no equivalent terminology appears in contemporary Scottish, English, or American legal systems.
The key research trap is treating claremethen as a general common law warranty concept. It is not. It belongs to a specific Scots institutional framework governing the transfer of cattle and moveable goods in a society where proving lawful possession was practically difficult and legally consequential. A researcher studying common law warranty doctrines, implied warranties of title, or general property transfer rules should not lean on claremethen as a precedent or parallel.
All three source dictionaries cite Sir John Skene as authority. Skene's work — particularly his glossary of Scots legal terms, De Verborum Significatione (1597) — is the primary historical source for this and many other Old Scots law terms. Researchers tracing claremethen beyond the dictionary shelf should go directly to Skene rather than treating the dictionary entries as independent authority; all three entries are derivative of the same single source.
The term may surface in research on Scots reiving culture, Border law, or historical livestock markets, and could appear in older Scots court records or property instruments. Researchers working in those areas should be alert to variant spellings — archaic Scots terms frequently appear in inconsistent orthographic forms across manuscript sources.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three dictionaries — Black's (1st Ed.), Black's (2nd Ed.), and Bouvier's — offer nearly identical definitions, each tracing directly to Skene. This convergence reflects the term's narrow historical currency rather than independent verification: the dictionaries are not confirming one another so much as reproducing a single primary source.
Bouvier's adds a cross-reference to Black's, making explicit that it is not working from independent research. Black's 2nd Ed. expands the surrounding entry space to discuss the Constitutions of Clarendon, which is a separate legal matter entirely and reflects only alphabetical proximity in the dictionary, not conceptual connection.
None of the three dictionaries offers analysis of how claremethen operated in practice, what remedies attached to a breach of the warranty, or how the doctrine interacted with Scots theft law more broadly. The entries are definitional placeholders rather than substantive legal analyses. For any depth beyond the bare definition, Skene's original work is the necessary starting point.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Claremethen is exclusively a Scots law term with no counterpart in English common law, American law, or modern Scots law. It is relevant only to historical research in Scottish legal sources, particularly pre-Union materials.
---