by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." Ratified March 30, 1870. In the case of each Amendment, Congress is given express power to enforce the provisions thereof by appropriate legislation. The series have a common purpose: to secure to the negro race all the civil rights the white race enjoy; - to raise the colored race into perfect equality of civil rights with all others in the State; - to take away all possibility of oppression by law because of race or color; - to secure equal protection of the laws. They are limitations on the power of the States, and enlargement of the powers of Congress. To carry out their purpose they are to be construed liberally. The XIIIth Amendment forbids all forms of involuntary slavery - African slavery, Mexican peonage, Chinese coolie trade. It declares the personal freedom of all the human race within the jurisdiction of the United States. After the slave had been emancipated, certain States so curtailed his rights that his freedom was of little value: in this originated the XIVth Amendment. The laws being still administered by the white man alone, the XVth Amendment was adopted to make the negro a voter. The XIVth Amendment conferred citizenship on the negro, defines citizenship in the United States and in the States, and protects the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States from hostile legislation by the States. That is, it not only gave citizenship, but it denies a State power to withhold equal protection of the laws, and gives Congress power to enforce its provisions by appropriate legislation, as, by removal of a cause from a State to a Federal court. Its enforcement is left to the discretion of Congress. In an especial sense it makes one law for black and for white. It does not enumerate rights, but speaks in general terms. It confers a new constitutional right: exemption from discrimination between persons and classes of persons by action of any State; it does not refer to action by a private individual.1 The XIVth Amendment intended not only that there should be no arbitrary deprivation of life or liberty, or arbitrary spoliation of property, but that equal protection and security should be given to all under like circumstances in the enjoyment of their personal and civil rights; that all persons should be equally en1 Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 70-71 (1873), Miller, J. Regarded a "servitude" in property. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U. S. 306, 310 (1879), Strong, J. S., a negro, tried for murder, had been denied a removal of the cause into a circuit court. Virginia v. Rives, ib. 318 (1879), - in which a mixed jury was denied. Exp. Virginia, 100 U. S. 344-48 (1879), Strong, J. That State petitioned for the discharge of one Coles, a county judge, indicted for excluding a colored man from a jury. Bush v. Kentucky, 107 id. 118-19 (1882), cases. Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 30-31 (1879), Bradley, J. Regarded a regulation of jurisdiction. Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 385-86 (1880), Harlan, J.; United States v. Woods, 106 id. 637-44 (1882), Woods, J.; United States v. Reese, 92 id. 214, 218 (1875), Waite, C. J. titled to pursue their happiness and acquire and enjoy property; that they should have like access to the courts of the country for the protection of their persons and property, the prevention and redress of wrongs, and the enforcement of contracts; that no impediment should be interposed to the pursuits of any one except as applied to the same pursuits by others under like circumstances; that no greater burdens should be laid upon one than are laid upon the others in the same calling and condition, and that In the administration of criminal justice no different or higher punishment should be imposed upon one than is prescribed to all for like offenses. The Amendment does not interfere with the "police power" of the States-a regulation designed not to impose unequal or unnecessary restrictions upon any one, but to promote, with as little individual inconvenience as possible, the general good. legislation, discriminating against some and favoring others, is prohibited, but legislation which, in carrying out a public purpose, is limited in its application, if within the sphere of its operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated, is not within the Amendment.1 Class The XIVth Amendment forbids an ordinance which, though expressed in general terms, is directed against a particular class, as Chinese convicts, by imposing a degrading punishment, like that of cutting off the queue.2 An administration of an ordinance for carrying on a lawful business (that of a laundry), which makes dis. criminations founded upon differences of race between persons otherwise in similar circumstances, violates the XIVth Amendment.3 The XVth Amendment merely invests citizens of the United States with the constitutional right of exemption from discrimination in the enjoyment of the elective f 1. An incorporated town or borough, which, in England, is or has 1 Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 31-32 (1885), Field, J. See also Pace v. Alabama, 106 id. 584 (1882); Railroad Tax Case (County of San Mateo v. South. Pacific R. Co.), 8 Saw. 251, 302 (1882); Civil Rights Cases, 109 U. S. 3, 11, 23, 24 (1883); 93 N. Y. 446. 2 Ah Kow v. Nunan, 5 Saw. 552, 562 (1879). • Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U. S. 356, 365 (1886). United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 (1875); United States v. Harris, 106 id. 637 (1882). * Le Grand v. United States, 12 F. R. 577, 583-85 (1882). • L. civitas, citizens in a community: civis, a citizen..