A round-about course: indirect action, or procedure. Circuity of action. An indirect or roundabout mode of suing: where a party by an parties claiming the use or control of the property, indirect proceeding makes two or more acand see that it is not diverted from the trust. (2) Is the society of the strictly independent form of government, owing no submission to any organization outside of the congregation? If so, the rights of conflicting claimants are determined by the ordinary rules which govern voluntary associations-the will of the majority, the decision of chosen officers, or otherwise. Those who adhere to the acknowledged organism by which the body is governed are entitled to the use of the property. No inquiry is made into the opinions of those who comprise the legal or regular organization. (3) Is the society one of a number united to form a more general body of churches, with ecclesiastical control in the general association over the individual members and societies? The tribunals of such association decide all questions of faith, discipline, rule, custom, or government.. When a right of property depends on one of those questions, and that has been decided by the highest tribunal within the organization to which it has been carried, the civil courts accept that decision as final. The local society is but a member of a larger organization, under its control and bound by its judgments.1 Church and state. See RELIGION. See also ASSEMBLY, Civil; BANNS; CANON, Law; CHRISTIANITY; CONGREGATION; PARISH, 1; PEW; SANCTUARY, 1; SCHISM; SUBSCRIBE, 2; WORSHIP. 1 Watson v. Jones, 13 Wall. 713, 722-34 (1871), cases, Miller, J. The litigation grew out of dissension, due primarily to differences of opinion upon the subject of slavery, among the members of the Third or Walnut Street Presbyterian Church, of Louisville, Ky. See also Bouldin v. Alexander, 15 id. 131, 140 (1872); Same v. Same, 103 U. S. 330 (1880); Hennessey v. Walsh, 55 Ν. Η. 515, 526 (1875); Stack v. O'Hara, 98 Pa. 232 (1881); Graff v. Greer, 88 Ind. 131-32 (1882), cases; Hadley v. Mendenhall, 89 id. 136, 152-56 (1883), cases; Whitecar v. Michenor, 37 N. J. E. 6 (1883), cases; State v. Rector, 45 N. J. L. 230 (1883); 12 Am. Law Reg. 201, 329, 537 (1873), cases; 15 id. 276-82 (1876), cases; Relations of Civil Law to Church Polity, etc. (1875), Hon. William Strong. tions necessary, when justice could be obtained by a single action involving a more direct course. To prevent circuity of action, a court of equity often entertains jurisdiction upon this ground alone; and to avoid it, cross-demands and judgments are set off against each other. Circuitus est evitandus. Circuity is to be avoided.2