In a revenue act, may mean a locality more limited than the country where goods are bought or manufactured.2 In internal revenue acts, as applied to the place where a licensee may carry on business, construed with reference to the business, but not as an equivalent for county, town or State. In a statute forbidding betting in any "house, office, room, or other place," need not be covered with a roof; an umbrella is such place. A canvas tent may be a disorderly house or place. In a statute forbidding the sale of liquors "in any place" within four hundred feet of a public schoolhouse, held to include a tent, a booth, an excavation in the ground or anything similar thereto.7 Public place. It would be difficult to define what is a "public place" within the meaning of statutes against gaming, affrays, retailing liquor, indecent exposure of person and drunkenness, for notices of sale, etc.; but, generally speaking, it means a place where the public may go uninvited. Not, necessarily, a place devoted exclusively to the uses of the public, but "public" in fact, as distinguished from private; visited by many persons; usually accessible to the neighboring public.8 A public highway is not necessarily a public place: it may be abandoned or traverse a forest." A place where the public has a right to go and be; not every place where people may be congregated.10 For the purpose of setting up notices of sale, a place likely to give information to those interested, and who may probably become bidders. The term is relative; what is a public place for one purpose may not be public for another. 11 See PUBLIC. Compare ALIBI; LOCUS; SITUS; VENUE. 1 Palmer v. Kelleher, 111 Mass. 321-22 (1873), Morton, J. Place of contract. Matters bearing upon the execution, the interpretation, and the validity of a contract, are determined by the law of the place where the contract is made. Matters connected with its performance are regulated by the law prevailing at the place of performance. Matters respecting the remedy, such as the bringing of suits, the admission of evidence, the statute of limitations, depend upon the law of the place where suit is brought.1 The general rules, and their exceptions, are familiar, but the books are full of conflicting illustrations of their application. The primary rule is that the validity of a contract is to be determined by the law of the State where it was made. If valid there, it is deemed valid everywhere, and it will sustain an action in a State whose laws do not permit such a contract. If the contract is not in itself immoral, although expressly prohibited in the State where suit is brought, the courts administering the comity of that State will not refuse to enforce the contract. The principal exception is that the law of the place of performance will govern the mode of performance, because it is presumed that the parties had this law in mind when they entered into the contract; but the presumption may be rebutted by an express declaration to the contrary, or by the fact that the obligation is illegal by the local law.a Place of delivery. In a contract of sale, if no place of delivery is specified, the articles must, in general, be delivered at the place where they were at the time of sale, unless some other place is required by the nature of the article, the usage of the trade, or the previous course of dealing between the parties, or is to be inferred from the circumstances of the case. If a place is prescribed as a part of the contract, the vendee is not bound to accept, nor is the vendor obliged to make, a tender of the goods elsewhere. See SALE. 69, 135; 29 id. 46; 30 id. 19, 524, 532, 550; 31 id. 371; 32 id. 596; 35 id. 390; 37 id. 472; 59 id. 89; 9 Tex. 430; 21 id. 223; 26 id. 145, 204; 43 id. 602; 4 Leigh, 680; 8 id. 741; 6 Gratt. 689; 8 id. 585; 14 id. 679; 22 id. 917; as to exposure of person, 4 Hun, 636; 43 Tex. 346; 3 Car. & Κ. 360; 2 Cox, C. C. 376; 3 id. 248; L. R., 1 C. C. 282; 1 L. & C. 326; 2 Camp. 89; 1 Den. C. C. 338; as to intoxication, 52 Ind. 311, 481; 74 id. 103; 36 N. H. 59; 26 L. J. M. C. 178; as to sales of liquors, 74 Me. 563; 54 Vt. 155; as to public sales of property 71 Me. 547; 48 Mo. 300; 3 Ν. Η. 179; 40 id. 173; 57 Ind. 556; 53 Vt. 447; 44 Wis. 2 Ciiquot's Champagne, 3 Wall. 142 (1865), Swayne, J.; 213. Act 3 March, 1863, § 1. Salt Company v. Wilkinson, 8 Blatch. 33 (1870). 1 Scudder v. Union Nat. Bank, 91 U. S. 412 (1875), Hunt, J. See also Pritchard v. Norton, 106 id. 129-41 • Eastwood v. Miller, L. R., 9 Q. B. 443 (1874); 10 id. (1882), cases; Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 4 Wall. 102; L. R., 3 Ex. 137; 12 L. T. 355. • Bows v. Tenwick, L. R., 9 C. P. 343 (1874). • Killman v. State, 2 Tex. Ар. 222 (1877). Commonwealth v. Jones, 142 Mass. 575 (1886). • Parker v. State, 26 Tex. 207 (1862). • Williams v. State, 64 Ind. 555-57 (1878), cases. 10 State v. Welch, 88 Ind. 310 (1882): 52 id. 311. " Cummins v. Little, 16 N. J. E. 53 (1863). See, as to affrays, 22 Ala. 15; 35