Definition
The Cherokee Nation is one of the largest and most historically significant federally recognized Native American tribes in the United States, with origins in the southeastern United States — primarily present-day Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and surrounding areas — and a present-day seat of government in Tahlequah, Oklahoma.
In legal usage, "Cherokee Nation" carries both a specific and a general significance:
1. As a proper noun, it refers to the sovereign tribal government and its enrolled citizens, recognized by the federal government as a distinct political community with inherent powers of self-governance.
2. As a legal and historical reference point, "Cherokee Nation" is inseparable from the foundational federal Indian law trilogy — Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832), along with Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823) — in which the Supreme Court defined the basic legal relationship between tribal nations and the United States government. These cases established the "domestic dependent nations" doctrine and the trust relationship that continues to structure federal Indian law.
The Cherokee Nation is not merely a historical or ethnographic subject. It is an ongoing political and governmental entity with the power to enact laws, maintain courts, regulate membership, and enter into agreements — subject to the plenary power of Congress and the federal trust relationship.
---
Common Confusion
"Cherokee Nation" is sometimes treated as synonymous with "Cherokee people" or "Cherokee tribe," but these terms are not interchangeable in legal contexts. There are multiple distinct Cherokee governmental entities, including the Cherokee Nation (headquartered in Tahlequah, Oklahoma), the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians (also in Oklahoma, separately federally recognized), and the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (in North Carolina). A researcher working with legal documents, treaty text, or regulatory materials must identify which entity is at issue. Confusion between these groups has produced litigation over membership, treaty rights, and federal recognition standing.
A separate and significant confusion concerns the Freedmen citizenship controversy — the question of whether descendants of enslaved people held by Cherokee citizens before the Civil War hold citizenship rights in the Cherokee Nation under the Treaty of 1866. This remains an active legal and political issue and is not merely historical.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Cherokee Nation is among the most-litigated proper nouns in American legal history. Researchers encounter it across at least four distinct bodies of law, each with its own documentary trail and traps:
Federal Indian Law Foundations. The 1831 and 1832 Supreme Court decisions define the vocabulary of tribal sovereignty to this day. Any research into tribal sovereign immunity, federal preemption of state law over Indian country, or the trust responsibility begins here. Older sources, including Bouvier's, treat these cases as settled background but do not capture the significant doctrinal turbulence of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.
Treaty Research. The Cherokee Nation entered into more treaties with the United States than almost any other tribe. The treaties of 1785, 1791, 1798, 1804, 1805, 1807, 1817, 1819, 1828, 1833, 1835 (Treaty of New Echota — the removal treaty), 1846, 1866, and others are all primary legal sources that remain operative in various respects. The Treaty of New Echota (1835), signed by a minority faction and repudiated by the principal Cherokee government, produced the forced removal known as the Trail of Tears and is the subject of extensive historical and legal scholarship. Researchers must understand which faction or government signed a given instrument.
Allotment Era Documents. Following the Dawes Act (1887) and the Curtis Act (1898), the Dawes Rolls were compiled as the official Cherokee citizenship roll for allotment purposes. These records are foundational for proving Cherokee citizenship and appear constantly in probate, property, and benefits litigation. The rolls are a bureaucratic artifact of federal policy, not a neutral record, and their legal weight is distinct from tribal enrollment today.
Twentieth-Century Reconstitution. The Cherokee Nation's governmental functions were effectively dismantled by federal policy in the early twentieth century and reconstituted beginning in the 1970s under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (1975). Legal materials from the mid-twentieth century may reflect a period when tribal governmental authority was severely curtailed; researchers should not assume continuity of governmental capacity across that gap.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary identifies the Cherokee Nation briefly as "a tribe of Iroquoian Indians formerly occupying northern Georgia, but now dwelling in Oklahoma; the most enlightened of the Indian peoples of America." The entry cross-references INDIAN and reflects the paternalistic framing common to nineteenth- and early twentieth-century legal sources. The characterization "most enlightened" echoes a recurring theme in period sources: the Cherokee Nation's adoption of a written constitution (1827), a bicameral legislature, a supreme court, and a bilingual newspaper (the Cherokee Phoenix, founded 1828) was frequently cited by Euro-American commentators as evidence of assimilationist "civilization." This framing carries ideological freight that researchers should recognize — it was deployed both to argue for Cherokee land rights and, paradoxically, to argue that the Cherokees had voluntarily submitted to state jurisdiction.
Bouvier's entry does not address treaty rights, the removal, the Dawes Rolls, or the reconstitution of tribal government, all of which are indispensable to legal research involving the Cherokee Nation. The entry's geographical description ("formerly occupying northern Georgia") reflects the post-removal status quo as if it were natural fact, erasing the legal controversy surrounding removal itself.
No other historical dictionaries in the Law Mind corpus provide a substantive entry on the Cherokee Nation. Researchers should treat Bouvier's note as an orientation marker only and proceed directly to primary sources and specialized treatises on federal Indian law.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The Cherokee Nation's sovereign territory — "Indian Country" in the statutory sense — spans much of northeastern Oklahoma. The Supreme Court's decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020) confirmed that much of eastern Oklahoma, including land associated with the Five Civilized Tribes (of which the Cherokee Nation is one), remains Indian Country for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction. This ruling has significant ongoing implications for criminal, civil, and regulatory jurisdiction in Oklahoma and is not yet fully settled in its downstream applications.
---