Definition
An archaic term from English legal procedure denoting two closely related things:
1. A summary of matters to be inquired of or presented before justices in eyre, justices of assize, or justices of the peace at their sessions. This was effectively the agenda of presentable grievances and issues that a grand jury or inquest was expected to address.
2. Articles delivered by a justice in the form of a charge to the inquest — the formal instructions given to jurors identifying the subjects they were to investigate and report upon.
Both usages belong exclusively to medieval and early modern English procedural law. The chapitre functioned as a kind of enumerated brief directing the attention of an inquest, ensuring that no cognizable matter fell through the gaps of a session. The sole surviving treatise citation in all three source dictionaries is to Britton, the thirteenth-century Anglo-Norman legal text attributed to John le Breton.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Obsolete form of "chapter."
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not separately defined; treated as a variant spelling of "chapter," itself derived from Old French chapitre and Latin capitulum, meaning a principal division of a text or an assembly of clergy.
The gap here is meaningful only as a caution: a researcher encountering "chapitre" in a historical manuscript may instinctively read it as a reference to a chapter of a text or a chapter of a religious house. In its legal context, however, it is a procedural instrument — not a textual division and not an ecclesiastical body. The shared etymology conceals a functional divergence.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term appears almost exclusively in sources dealing with the Eyre system and the early common law of presentment. Researchers working in:
- Plea rolls and eyre records from the twelfth through fourteenth centuries
- Treatises such as Britton, Bracton, or Fleta
- Studies of grand jury origins and the law of presentment
...may encounter chapitre as a technical label for the charge or articles framing an inquest. It will not appear in modern statutory compilations or post-seventeenth-century case law. Its practical life ended with the eyre itself, which had largely fallen out of use by the mid-fourteenth century.
The key research trap is confusion with two cognate terms: "chapter" in its ecclesiastical sense (a body of canons) and "charge" in its modern jury sense. A chapitre is ancestral to the modern judge's charge to the jury but is not identical to it — the chapitre was a written enumeration of topics, not an oral legal instruction on elements and burdens.
Secondary sources treating the grand jury's historical development will sometimes use "chapitre" without definition, assuming the reader is already working within eyre procedure. If you encounter the term in a footnote to a nineteenth-century treatise, the author is almost certainly reaching back to Britton directly.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three source dictionaries — Black's (1st ed.), Black's (2nd ed.), and Rapalje & Lawrence — reproduce substantially identical definitions, each tracing the term to Britton, chapter three. There is no meaningful divergence among them. This uniformity is itself informative: the term was already archaeological by the time these dictionaries were compiled in the late nineteenth century, and none of the editors had occasion to update or expand the definition from observed usage.
Rapalje & Lawrence's entry is notable for immediately following with a definition of "Chaplain," suggesting that by that period chapitre was treated as a pure historical cross-reference rather than a living term requiring substantive treatment.
What the historical dictionaries do not address: the relationship between the chapitre and the bill of indictment, the degree to which the articles in a chapitre were standardized across eyres, or the procedural consequences if a matter omitted from the chapitre was later raised. These are questions for the eyre rolls and the specialist literature on medieval English administration, not for these dictionaries.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Chapitre is exclusively an English legal term, rooted in the common law eyre system. It has no recognized counterpart in American law, Scots law, or the civil law tradition. American researchers will encounter it only in comparative historical scholarship or in reprinted editions of the medieval English treatises.
---