Definition
A historical common law writ directing justices to affix their seals to exceptions taken by a party in litigation — most commonly a defendant objecting to a plaintiff's evidence, verdict, or other proceedings. The writ compelled the presiding justices to formally authenticate the exception so that it could be preserved for review. It derived from the Statute of Westminster II (13 Edw. I, St. 1, c. 31), which created the procedural mechanism by which a party could formally place objections on the record and have those objections certified by the court.
The full Latin phrase most commonly encountered is ad faciendum ceptionem, meaning "for the making of an exception." The shortened form ceptionem functions as a shorthand reference to this writ in the older registers and abridgments.
---
Common Confusion
Ceptionem is sometimes loosely equated with the bill of exceptions itself. The distinction matters: ceptionem is the writ that commanded the sealing, while the bill of exceptions is the document containing the objection. The writ was the enforcement mechanism; the bill was the instrument. In research contexts, conflating the two can cause a researcher to misread the procedural history of a case or misattribute the origin of the bill of exceptions doctrine.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term will appear almost exclusively in pre-nineteenth century English common law materials — registers of writs, abridgments, and treatises on practice and pleading rooted in the Westminster statutes. Researchers encountering ceptionem in historical sources should understand it as a procedural artifact of the medieval and early modern English court system, not a substantive right or doctrine.
The critical navigational point: ceptionem is closely tied to the broader bill of exceptions procedure. When tracing the history of the right to challenge trial court rulings on appeal, ceptionem is an early link in the chain that runs through English practice into American federal and state appellate procedure. A researcher focused on the development of the bill of exceptions — or on how error was preserved at common law — will find ceptionem cited as foundational.
Sources referencing ceptionem will typically cite the Registrum Omnium Brevium (Reg. Orig.) as the formal authority for the writ's form. Black's second edition cites Reg. Orig. 182. Researchers using older abridgments such as Fitzherbert or Rolle may find the writ indexed under forms of action or under exceptions rather than under its Latin name, requiring lateral searching.
No American jurisdictional counterpart exists. The writ itself did not migrate into American practice in any named form. Its functional descendant — the bill of exceptions — did, but under that name, not under ceptionem.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's Law Dictionary agree on the substance: ceptionem is the writ compelling justices to seal exceptions. The first edition is fragmentary in its surviving entry; the second edition provides the more complete statement, adding the Registrum Omnium Brevium citation and the phrase "formerly commanded," correctly signaling that the writ was already obsolete by the time Black's was compiled.
Neither edition situates ceptionem within the broader history of appellate review or the bill of exceptions procedure, which limits their utility for a researcher trying to understand why the writ existed. They treat it as a definitional entry rather than a doctrinal one.
What the historical dictionaries miss: the writ's significance as an early mechanism for making the record speak — for ensuring that a judge's rulings could be reviewed by a higher tribunal at all. Without the sealing of an exception, the objection effectively disappeared. In that sense, ceptionem represents a foundational moment in the concept of preserved error.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Ceptionem is exclusively an English common law writ with no direct American analog. The bill of exceptions procedure that descended from it was adopted in American federal courts and most state courts, but under that name and under statutory authority rather than by writ. Researchers working in early American materials will not encounter ceptionem; they will encounter the bill of exceptions instead.
---