A question contested before a court of justice. An action or suit at law or in equity. 1 Wheat. 352. Within the meaning of § 2 of Article III of the U. S. Constitution, a case is a com- plaint of a plaintiff "brought before the court[s] for determination by such regular proceedings as are established by law or custom for the protection or enforcement of rights, or the prevention, redress, or punish- ment of wrongs." 258 U.S. 129. See 32 Fed. 241. 255. quoted in 219 U. S. 346. 356. A case arising under a treaty, within U. S. Const. art. 3, § 2; is a suit in which the validity or construction of a treaty of the United States is drawn into question; 2 Sto. Const. § 1647; and under the judiciary act of 1789, § 25, the U. S. supreme court exercises an appellate jurisdiction in such cases decided by a state court only when the decision of the latter is against the title, right, privilege, or exemption set up or claimed by the party seeking to have the decision reviewed: 1 Wheat. 856. The de- cision of the state court against the claimant must be upon the construction of the treaty; if it rests upon other grounds it is not a case arising under a treaty, and the supreme court is without any jurisdiction; 5 Cra. 544; 11 How. 529; 12 id. 111. See also as to cases under treaties; 6 Cra. 286; 8 Wall. 304; 8 id. 650; 20 id. 522; 29 Ct. of Cl. 62; id. 144; id. 288; 31 S. W. Rep. (Tex.) 1064. In Practice. A form of action which lies to recover damages for injuries for which the more ancient forms of action will not lie. Steph. Pl., And. ed. § 52. Case, or, more fully, action upon the case, or tres- pass on the case, includes in its widest sense as- sumpsit and trover, and distinguishes a class of actions in which the writ is framed according to the special circumstances of the case, from the ancient actions, the writs in which, called brevia formata, are collected in the Registrum Brevium. By the common law, and by the statute Westm. 2d, 18 Edw. I. c. 24, if any cause of action arose for which no remedy had been provided, a new writ was to be formed, analogous to those already in exist- ence which were adapted to similar causes of action. The writ of trespass was the original writ most com- monly resorted to as a precedent; and in process of time the term trespass seems to have been so ex- tended as to include every species of wrong causing an injury, whether it was malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance, apparently for the purpose of en- abling an action on the case to be brought in the king's bench. It thus includes actions on the case for breach of a parol undertaking, now called us- sumpsit (see ASSUMPSIT), and actions based upon a finding and subsequent unlawful conversion of property, now called trover (see TROVER), as well as many other actions upon the case which seem to have been derived from other originals than the writ of trespass, as nuisance, deceit, etc. And. as the action had thus lost the peculiar char- acter of a technical trespass, the name was to a great extent dropped, and actions of this character came to be known as actions on the case. As used at the present day, case is distinguished from assumpsit and covenant, in that it is not founded upon any contract, express or implied; from trover, which lies only for unlawful conver- sion; from detinue and replevin, in that it lies only to recover damages; and from trespass, in that it lies for injuries committed without force, or for forcible injuries which damage the plaintiff conse- quentially only, and in other respects. See 8 Reeves, Eng. Law 84; 1 Spence, Eq. Jur. 287; 1 Chit. Pl. 123; 8 Bla. Com. 41; Poll. Tort 645; 5 Term 648. A similar division existed in the civil law, in which upon nominate contracts an action distinguished by the name of the contract was given. Upon innomi- nate contracts, however, an action præscriptis ver- bis (which lày where the obligation was one already recognized as existing at law, but to which no name had been given), or in factum (which was founded on the equity of the particular case), might be brought. The action lies for: Torts not committed with force, actual or implied; 2 Ired. 38; 2 Gratt. 866: 20 Vt. 151; 8 Ga. 190; as, for malicious prosecu- tion; 6 Munf. 27, 118; 11 G. & J. 80; 7 Β. Monr. 545; 21 Ala. N. S. 491; 30 Mo. App. 524; 92 Mích. 428; 8 Conn. 537; 5 M. & W. 270; see MALICIOUS PROSECUTION; fraud in purchases and sales; 1 T. B. Monr. 215; 17 Wend. 193; 22; Ala. 501; 3 Cush. 407; 17 Pa. 293; 4 Strobh. 69; 15 Ark. 109; 18 Ill. 299; 92 Mich. 304; conspiracy to de- fame; 111 Pa. 335. Torts committed forcibly where the matter affected was not tangible; 2 Conn. 529; 2 Vt. 68; as, for obstructing a private way; 14 Johns. 383; 5 H. & J. 467; 18 Pick. 110; 23 Pa. 348; 2 Dutch. 308; disturbing the plaintiff in the use of a pew; 1 Chit. Pl. 43; injury to a franchise. Torts committed forcibly when the injury is consequential merely, and not immediate; 6 S. & R. 348; 6 H. & J. 230; 4 D. & Β. 146; 81 Mich. 21; as,