Definition
A wheeled vehicle used for transporting goods, luggage, or burdens, typically distinguished by its two-wheeled construction from a wagon, which has four wheels. In legal contexts, the term arises primarily in two settings: (1) property and commercial law, where it describes a vehicle used to carry heavy loads; and (2) criminal law history, where it refers to the vehicle used to convey condemned criminals to the place of execution.
Courts have recognized that while the primary meaning of "cart" contemplates a two-wheeled vehicle, the term may be interpreted more broadly in statutory construction to encompass four-wheeled vehicles when necessary to fulfill legislative intent.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): In contemporary informal usage, "cart" may refer to a tape cartridge for broadcast media, a game cartridge for video or computer systems, or a cannabis oil vape cartridge.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): A two-wheeled vehicle used in husbandry or for transporting heavy goods; also a light business wagon used by tradespeople such as bakers and grocers; and an open two-wheeled pleasure carriage.
The modern colloquial senses — cartridges, vape pens, game media — bear no relation to the legal meaning. The legal definition tracks the Webster's 1913 agricultural and transport sense closely, but adds a specific criminal-procedure usage absent from ordinary dictionaries. Researchers should not assume that statutory references to "cart" in historical texts carry any meaning beyond the vehicle.
---
Common Confusion
The distinction between a cart and a wagon was legally significant in statutes regulating vehicles, road use, taxation of conveyances, and commercial transportation. The key technical difference is wheel count: two wheels (cart) versus four wheels (wagon). However, as noted in Favers v. Glass and Bouvier's treatment of the same case, courts did not always apply that distinction rigidly. Where a statute used "cart" to describe burden-bearing vehicles generally, courts extended the term to four-wheeled conveyances to serve the statute's purpose. Researchers working with road, toll, or commerce statutes must check how the specific jurisdiction and period treated the cart/wagon distinction rather than assuming a universal rule.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The primary research significance of "cart" is statutory and historical. The term appears in older road law, toll law, and commercial regulation statutes where the number of wheels determined the applicable fee, restriction, or licensing category. A researcher working with nineteenth-century transportation statutes, municipal ordinances governing street use, or commercial licensing codes must be alert to whether the enacting jurisdiction adhered to the strict two-wheeled definition or followed the broader interpretive approach signaled by Alabama courts and endorsed by Bouvier.
The criminal-procedure meaning — the cart used in execution processions — surfaces in historical accounts of punishment and in legal commentary on capital punishment practice, but it has no practical modern application. It is relevant primarily to legal historians and to researchers working with early English or early American materials on the mechanics of criminal sentence execution.
Researchers should also note that Anderson's Dictionary of Law offers only a cross-reference to WAGON, which signals that some authorities treated the terms as sufficiently overlapping to discuss together rather than separately. Consulting the WAGON entry in any historical dictionary will often supply the comparative context needed to understand how "cart" was being used in a given source.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (both editions) and Bouvier's Law Dictionary present substantially identical definitions, each drawing on the two-wheeled/four-wheeled distinction as the primary technical meaning while acknowledging judicial willingness to extend the term. Black's first and second editions both cite Favers v. Glass for the proposition that "cart" can carry a more extended signification. Bouvier cites the same case (with a slight variation in the page number) and attributes the execution-vehicle meaning to Johnson's dictionary, grounding that sense in common usage rather than legal doctrine.
Anderson's Dictionary of Law takes a different editorial approach, declining to define the term independently and simply directing the reader to WAGON. This is itself informative: it suggests that by the time Anderson compiled his dictionary, the practical legal distinction between the two vehicles was considered minor enough to address within a single combined entry.
None of the historical dictionaries addresses the question of motorized or mechanized vehicles, which is unsurprising given their publication dates. Researchers applying historical "cart" statutes to later periods should consider how modernizing canons of construction or subsequent legislation dealt with the transition from animal-drawn to mechanized transport.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The strict two-wheeled definition was the dominant common-law baseline, but American courts showed willingness to read "cart" broadly in statutory contexts. The Alabama authority cited across multiple dictionaries illustrates this flexibility. Researchers working with statutes from other jurisdictions should not assume that the Alabama interpretive approach was universally adopted without checking local authority.
---