Definition
A phrase used in conveyancing to describe the lines that circumscribe and enclose a particular piece of land — that is, the boundary lines that define its perimeter. "Butts and bounds" carries the same functional meaning as the more familiar phrase "metes and bounds," both referring to a method of describing real property by tracing its outer limits through a series of directional lines and terminal points.
The phrase is archaic and rarely appears in modern instruments, having been largely displaced by "metes and bounds" as the standard term of art. Where it does appear — predominantly in older deeds, grants, and colonial-era conveyances — it signals a boundary description rather than a reference to surrounding parcels.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Not recognized as a standard entry. "Butt" in ordinary English refers to the thicker end of an object, a target or object of ridicule, or a large cask for liquids. "Bounds" means limits or borders.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "Butt" carried a sense of a mark to shoot at, or an end abutting against something. "Bounds" meant boundary lines or limits generally.
The everyday sense of these words offers modest help here. "Butt" in the land-description context derives from the idea of a line terminating against or abutting something — an end point or terminal line. "Bounds" tracks the ordinary meaning of limits. The legal compound, however, is a technical term of conveyancing art: it describes the drawn perimeter of a parcel, not merely the things that border it from outside.
---
Common Confusion
BUTTS AND BOUNDS vs. METES AND BOUNDS: These phrases are synonymous in legal effect, and historical sources use them interchangeably. Researchers should not read significance into which phrase a drafter chose. "Metes and bounds" became the dominant term of art; "butts and bounds" survived in older instruments and regional usage but conveys no distinct legal meaning.
BUTTS AND BOUNDS vs. ABUTTALS: Burrill draws an important distinction that researchers should note. "Abuttals" describes property by reference to neighboring parcels — the lands that adjoin it on each side. "Butts and bounds," properly used, describes the lines themselves, without necessarily referencing exterior objects. In practice, historical drafters often blurred this line, using "butts and bounds" when they meant something closer to abuttals. A researcher encountering the phrase in a historical deed must read the description itself to determine which method was actually employed.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The primary research risk is mistaking a rare or unfamiliar phrase for something technically distinct from "metes and bounds." It is not. When you encounter "butts and bounds" in a historical deed or conveyancing form, treat it as an older synonym and proceed to analyze the boundary description on its own terms.
The phrase appears with greater frequency in colonial-era and early American land records, particularly in states with roots in English conveyancing practice. Researchers working in title chains that extend into the seventeenth or eighteenth century should expect to encounter it and should not flag it as anomalous or legally suspect.
Burrill's nuance — that the phrase technically describes boundary lines rather than abutting parcels — matters when a historical deed uses "butts and bounds" language but then proceeds to describe property entirely by reference to neighboring owners ("bounded north by land of John Smith, east by the highway..."). That is functionally an abuttals description, whatever the drafter called it. The distinction can be material when resolving boundary disputes or reconstructing historical parcel configurations, because abuttals-style descriptions are particularly vulnerable to ambiguity as neighboring parcels are subdivided or change ownership.
Researchers using the Law Mind corpus should connect "butts and bounds" descriptions to the broader literature on metes and bounds ambiguity, including gap and overlap problems and the rules governing conflicts between calls.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three shelf sources are in substantial agreement. Black's (both editions) defines the phrase concisely as describing "the end lines or circumscribing lines" of a parcel and equates it directly with "metes and bounds." Burrill adds useful texture, noting that the phrase is sometimes (imprecisely) used when a drafter is actually describing property by reference to abutting neighbors, and flagging that the more technically correct use refers to the boundary lines themselves. Burrill also characterizes "metes and bounds" as the "more technical" formulation — suggesting that even by the mid-nineteenth century, "butts and bounds" was already receding as a term of professional drafting.
None of the historical sources provide meaningful treatment of the phrase's historical prevalence or regional distribution. Researchers seeking to trace when and where the phrase was in active use will need to go beyond the dictionary shelf to deed compilations and regional conveyancing practice guides.
---
Jurisdictional Note
No modern jurisdiction treats "butts and bounds" as legally distinct from "metes and bounds." Regional prevalence in historical records is higher in the original thirteen states and other areas where English conveyancing forms were adopted early. Western states surveyed under the federal rectangular survey system will rarely present this phrase at all.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Property Descriptions — Metes and Bounds, Government Survey, Plat Maps, and Ambiguity (The Law Mind Real Estate Transactions & Construction Encyclopedia)
---