BROKEK - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

BROKEKAuthored

The Law Mind • 465 words

Definition

"Brokek" does not appear to be a recognized legal term. The source material provided under this heading contains no definition for "brokek" — the Anderson's Dictionary of Law entry supplied is in fact a partial definition of BRIEF (describing a hearing before an auditor, master, or commissioner, and the statement of law filed for a court of review), apparently misattributed or mislabeled in the source feed.

No legal dictionary, treatise, statute, or body of case law known to this reference contains the term "brokek" as a term of art. It does not correspond to any recognized variant spelling, transliteration, or archaic form of a known legal term.

---

Why It Matters in Research

Researchers encountering "brokek" in a source should treat it as a probable transcription error, OCR artifact, or typographical corruption. Digitized historical legal texts frequently produce garbled terms through optical character recognition errors, and unusual letter combinations of this kind — particularly the terminal "-ek" following an apparent root — are consistent with OCR misreads of words such as "broker," "broke," or "broken." Researchers should examine the surrounding text and consult the original physical source before concluding the term has independent legal meaning.

If the research context involves agency, intermediaries, or commercial transactions, the intended term may be BROKER. If the context involves insolvency or financial failure, the intended term may be BROKE (adjective) or a related insolvency concept. Neither of those possibilities should be assumed without verification against the original document.

The Anderson's Dictionary of Law content supplied with this entry — defining a hearing before an auditor or master and the filing of legal argument for a court of review — belongs to the entry for BRIEF, not to any term resembling "brokek." This mismatch reinforces the conclusion that the term as submitted is a data or transcription error rather than a genuine legal term requiring definition.

---

Historical Dictionary Support

Anderson's Dictionary of Law provides no entry for "brokek." The text fragment supplied in the source material is a continuation of Anderson's definition of BRIEF, describing both the procedural hearing context and the document filed with a court of review setting out applicable statutes and decisions. The fragment also references the related term "Briefless," meaning without briefs or without legal business. None of this content supports the existence of "brokek" as a legal term.

No other historical legal dictionary in the Law Mind corpus — including Black's Law Dictionary, Bouvier's Law Dictionary, or Burrill's Law Dictionary — contains an entry for "brokek."

---

BROKEKmain

Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890

hearing before an auditor, master, or other commissioner, to assist in elucidating the law, and, perhaps, the facts in a particular case; also, the statement of the law (statutes, decisions, etc.) supposed to apply to a case pending before a court of review, and filed for the information of the court and of opposing counsel.1 Briefless. Without briefs; without business requiring the preparation of briefs; without clients. Within the meaning of the rules of an appellate court, a "brief" is a statement of a case for the information of the court. It should furnish aid in deciding the case-show why the judgment below should be either reversed or affirmed.¹ After the trial or argument of a cause, though the counsel of one of the parties gives notice that he will furnish the court a brief of authorities, a decision may be rendered without giving time for the preparation of the brief. The reception of briefs being for the assistance of the court, the judges, who are presumed to know the law, are not bound to receive them.2